Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

0708-4 Finite automata theory and formal languages, TMV026/DIT321

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-23 - 2008-06-08
Antal svar: 12
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 20%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»

Your own effort

1. Which programme are you a student of?

12 svarande

D-programme, Chalmers»1 8%
IT-programme, Chalmers»2 16%
A Master"s programme, Chalmers»3 25%
Other programme/single course student, Chalmers»0 0%
University of Gothenburg»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- 2nd year» (IT-programme, Chalmers)
- FOCAL master, Dtek 03» (A Master"s programme, Chalmers)

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

12 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»8 66%
Around 20 hours/week»2 16%
Around 25 hours/week»2 16%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.5

- I have some background knowledge from Logic In Computer Science, Discrete mathematics, Programming languages» (At most 15 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

12 svarande

0%»1 8%
25%»1 8%
50%»1 8%
75%»3 25%
100%»6 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

- I have a full-time job on the side, which is why I attended so little of the teaching.» (0%)
- All lectures, not all excercise sessions» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

12 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 41%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 33%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not all students have the same background. As the course is given now, some are first year students.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 20%
Yes, definitely»7 70%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Although the last question seemed a bit hard, given that there was so little time given to the last chapter.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»2 16%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»8 66%
Great extent»2 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

- Since I did not attend it.» (Small extent)
- Great lectures. The exercise sessions should be demo sessions, a lot of the students are first years from GU and they are whimsy, which disturbs more focused students.» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

12 svarande

Small extent»3 25%
Some extent»2 16%
Large extent»4 33%
Great extent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- Great book. Just a bit too costly.» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 36%
Rather well»5 45%
Very well»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- The course homepage was badly updated, seemed to be a template from other years. Could have been handled better.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»4 33%
I did not seek help»5 41%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

- Thierry is always reachable through mail / office.» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

12 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 25%
Very well»5 41%
I did not seek cooperation»4 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.08

12. How was the course workload?

12 svarande

Too low»1 8%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 58%
High»4 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

13. How was the total workload this study period?

12 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 16%
Adequate»5 41%
High»4 33%
Too high»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I had Autonomous Agents, AI and this.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

12 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 8%
Adequate»2 16%
Good»6 50%
Excellent»3 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.91

- Good course, should be obligatory in the D programme.» (Excellent)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The exercise sessions.»
- Exercises questions and the slides and Thierry. :)»
- The lectures.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- good textbook but to bad it didnt contain answers to the questions inside.»
- Having an exam as its only mandatory thing is never good. Having handins every other week or something like that would be preferrable if you ask me.»
- Less proofs in the beginning of the course. It was too hard to understand and find use in them without understanding what the course was about.»
- Like i already told Thierry, the introduction of lecture NOTES besides the teaching aids(slides) would be helpful.»
- The exercise sessions.»

17. Additional comments

- The course was really interesting and it taught me a lot.»
- Good course, I liked it.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från