Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Project Course, IAR057
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2008-05-21 - 2008-06-06 Antal svar: 18 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 72% Kontaktperson: Bertil Gustafsson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.18 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 7 | | 38% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 5 | | 27% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 4 | | 22% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 3.05 - we want to the company almost twice every week.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- We spent one day out at the company while working individually the rst of the week» (Around 20 hours/week)
2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 18 svarande
0%» | | 1 | | 5% |
25%» | | 2 | | 11% |
50%» | | 2 | | 11% |
75%» | | 2 | | 11% |
100%» | | 11 | | 61% |
Genomsnitt: 4.11 - It didn"t have any teaching lecture due to the project course.» (0%)
- We only had 3 meetings with bertil and I did attend them all.» (50%)
- There were no lectures and the supervision was really unnecassary since Bertil didn"t care.» (75%)
- vi hade ju inga föreläsningar, men handledarmöten var jag med på.» (100%)
- the teaching was in the form of meeting with supervisor.» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?18 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 11% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 22% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 12 | | 66% |
Genomsnitt: 3.44 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.16 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 16 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 2 | | 13% |
Yes, definitely» | | 9 | | 60% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 4 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 3.13 - Yes, the presentation and comments from the opponents were remakable» (?)
- No examination.» (?)
- Don"t know what to answear here» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?18 svarande
Small extent» | | 4 | | 22% |
Some extent» | | 6 | | 33% |
Large extent» | | 7 | | 38% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 2.27 - had no.
» (Small extent)
- bra vägledning» (Large extent)
- We got all the answears we needed from Bertil.» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?14 svarande
Small extent» | | 6 | | 42% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 21% |
Large extent» | | 4 | | 28% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 7% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - hade ingen litteratur» (?)
- No course material» (?)
- No literature» (?)
- had no.» (Small extent)
- ingen kurslitteratur» (Small extent)
- There was no pre-decided literature for the course» (Small extent)
- there was no any pre defined course literature. The resource at the library was awesome.» (Great extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?15 svarande
Very badly» | | 1 | | 6% |
Rather badly» | | 3 | | 20% |
Rather well» | | 9 | | 60% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 13% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 - hade inte direkt några» (?)
- There wasn"t any» (?)
- had no.» (Very badly)
- Little work from Bertil.» (Rather badly)
- Very unclear and late handouts close to the introduction of the course.» (Rather badly)
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 7 | | 41% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 58% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.58 - never did it.» (Very good)
- We had a fantastic guidance throughout the project work.» (Very good)
- We got all the help we needed during the weekly meetings with Bertil.» (Very good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?18 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 1 | | 5% |
Rather well» | | 3 | | 16% |
Very well» | | 14 | | 77% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.72 - It is hard to cooperate with the foreign student since they assume that we should do everything for them. They don"t take any responsibility at all and one have to say everything they should do.» (Rather well)
11. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 5% |
Adequate» | | 8 | | 44% |
High» | | 5 | | 27% |
Too high» | | 4 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - Matching the time you want to spend.» (Adequate)
- är lite vad man gör det till» (High)
- It took some time, at least in the end » (High)
- more time required for doing such projects» (Too high)
- It"s though to spare time for the other course during the final stages of a project. But it"s a choice made on a individual level I guess.» (Too high)
12. How was the total workload this study period?18 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 16% |
Adequate» | | 6 | | 33% |
High» | | 6 | | 33% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 - Robotics course hace some time consuming labs but the project course took up most of the time.» (High)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?18 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 16% |
Good» | | 9 | | 50% |
Excellent» | | 6 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.16 - It"s fun to work at a company and see how it works.» (Adequate)
- Fun and "real" part in our develop towards engineers» (Good)
- This was a very good course, the first he at chalmers where you really could apply your skills and knowledge.» (Good)
- It is nice trying to work with real engineering work!» (Good)
- kul att göra ngt på riktigt. fler praktiska moment borde ingå i utbildningen.» (Excellent)
- Väldigt lärorik kurs där man får använda sina kunskaper på "riktigt".» (Excellent)
- This project work gave me enough space for extending my skill and knowledge.» (Excellent)
- A fun but time consuming course. Really nice experience to put the knowledge we"ve gained at chalmers to the test.» (Excellent)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Cryo AB as a company contact.»
- It is a good opportunity to come out and do some real projects at companies.»
- comments and criticism by opponents is obviously a nice way of learning and should preserve»
- konceptet är kanon!»
- The way the course is given, the opponent work and the grading system based on the project report.»
- doing project in the company is really useful and I gained lots of experience from it .»
- The form of the project. It provides freedom to do a real project.»
- Continue doing such courses like this.»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- More company contacts.»
- om möjligt, fler projekt och absolut max 6 pers i varje grupp.»
- More feedback please!
»
- should have a general guideline for writing report»
- Hade gärna haft en föreläsning eller mall för rapportskrivning och eventuellt något med projektledning skulle nog också varit bra!»
- The time deadline.... especially if the project requires a completion of lectures from other parallel course(s).»
- more communication between group member»
- Till now I don"t know what need to be changed.»
- The different projects should be out on the homepage much earlier so that everyone can take some time to read through them and knowing at the first leture what they are about. Also that Beril should wirte in the course description that it"s important to be on the first lecture and also that you can"t be away from this course during the period.»
- Increasing the time maybe up to two quarters if it"s possible, since we had to take lots of delimitation in oreder to get the project work at this time.»
- Having a mix of swedes and exchange students in all groups. Having more projects since there were quite many people in all projects »
16. Additional comments- I thought the assignments were good but i think that there were to many people in each group. Max 5 people in each group otherwise it hard to see everybody"s contribution. »
- It would be interesting with some guest lectures conserning project work and working within such an environment. Otherwise an interesting course, although abit unclear.»
- I enjoy the course and it is really a nice way to gather experience from the real world problems»
- I really enjoyed this course, and also I learned a lot from it.»
- A very good course»
- Keep offering more of these kind of courses»
- It was a very good course, maybe the best I have taken here in Chalmers. It also could bring us an overall overview of what could be the Master thesis in reality in near future. And there is also a possibility for students to continue working at those companies which could add another positive point to this kind of courses and the like.
At all that was very very good and bring me lots of knowledge which rarely could get within reading the books.»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|