Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Antenna engineering, SSY100, MPMPE, VT2008, SSY100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-13 - 2008-05-27
Antal svar: 24
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 68%
Kontaktperson: Jörgen Blennow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

24 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 29%
Around 20 hours/week»9 37%
Around 25 hours/week»8 33%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.04

- I was uninterested and therefore didn"t put down enough work.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

24 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»5 20%
50%»7 29%
75%»6 25%
100%»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Working part time so could not attend all lectures.» (50%)
- The exercise session was good but the lecture session was absolutely useless.Because reading book at home is better that attending in the lecture session.The teaching method didn"t motivate to attend in the lecture.» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

24 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»13 54%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.79

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 80%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- It is a bit hard to get into the course for us from Communication Engineering programme I think. But the new multipath chapter was good.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
- The goals are very relevant to practical or research work but the lecture sessions were the main problem to achieve the goal.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

22 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 18%
Yes, definitely»1 4%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»17 77%

Genomsnitt: 3.59

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

23 svarande

Small extent»7 30%
Some extent»10 43%
Large extent»5 21%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Important formulas and expressions should be derived and explained carefully, that way it would be more intressting to attend lectures!» (Small extent)
- "Teaching style can be improved, and material can made a bit more interesting"» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

24 svarande

Small extent»3 12%
Some extent»5 20%
Large extent»15 62%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.58

- The book is not very good.» (Large extent)
- The course book was good. It was easy to find extra information to get a better understanding of the lectures.» (Large extent)
- Too many errors in the textbook. Really irritating to be working on an assignment just to find out the formula is wrong.» (Large extent)
- The course book is terrible. The explanations are poor, the language not good, bad layout and there is also lots of incorrections in formulas, units and so on. I think it"s the worst course literature I have ever had at Chalmers.» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

24 svarande

Very badly»1 4%
Rather badly»2 8%
Rather well»16 66%
Very well»5 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

24 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»4 16%
Rather good»6 25%
Very good»11 45%
I did not seek help»3 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.54

- Opportunities for asking question was good, but the answer was difficult to understand in the lecture session.However,The exercise session was good understable.» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

24 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»3 12%
Rather well»14 58%
Very well»5 20%
I did not seek cooperation»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- We helped each other with the home assignments.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

24 svarande

Too low»1 4%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»13 54%
High»9 37%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I think the course is hard, and I had to spend some extra time working with it.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

23 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 4%
Adequate»16 69%
High»4 17%
Too high»2 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

24 svarande

Poor»6 25%
Fair»4 16%
Adequate»4 16%
Good»9 37%
Excellent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.79

- t another university use this book, there are already much, much better ones available. That he is allowed to continue to use his own pieace of shit in his education really changes my impression of chalmers. I"ve heard that the exam is easy. So typical for poor examinators: if your course is shit, give the students an easy exam so they don"t complain. Casn someone please DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS!» (Poor)
- The course was well structured.» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The Exercise Sessions as they helped a lot to understand things more easily.»
- The laborations and the home assignments»
- Some more studies should be included in the course about performance of antennas in statistical enviroments»
- The laboratory session was good but the number of labs or lab duration could be increased.So, that students may have depth knowledge about the lab objective.»
- lab and lecture»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The changing of lecturers. It would be better if Prof. Kildal had all the lectures. The labs are too easy, and don"t give very much additional understanding.»
- nothing»
- more interesting lab would be better.»
- In the third laboration a better explanation of what we were actually doing could be needed. The normalization part was a bit strange.»
- Too check spelling and also make sure that the home assignments are correct before handing them out, and not pointing that a formula is wrong at the day of the deadline.»
- Prfesseur Kildal should teach all the lectures.»
- a bit tiring with all the typos everywhere, in the book and handouts too.»
- Course book!»

16. Additional comments

- i have no backgroud so it"s really hard for me»
- " A pretty good course, but an additional introduction to antenna design software could really be benificial for the students"»
- lectures should also explain a bit more detail about the mathematical equations which are helpful in solving the exams»
- Some practical numerical problems would be useful to apply the computation methods taught in the book.»
- Authority should recruit a lecturer who has capability to make the students understable about the contents of the course and have efficient english speaking capability. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från