Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Optoelectronics, MCC055, MPMPE, VT2008, MCC055

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-13 - 2008-05-20
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 70%
Kontaktperson: Jörgen Blennow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 21%
Around 20 hours/week»4 28%
Around 25 hours/week»6 42%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

- The workload is quite adequate.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 15%
75%»4 30%
100%»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.07

- All the lectures but no tutorial session (partly because of collisions).» (50%)
- I had a clash with another course on monday afternoons and so missed those lectures. The exercise classes were not useful.» (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»4 28%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 71%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn, but i think, tutorial gives a numerical understandings, where we lack. » (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- I am not too sure of the credit system here though.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»1 7%
Yes, definitely»5 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- yet to examined !!!!» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- The lectures are good for a deeper understanding. Lab exercises where also very helpful.» (Large extent)
- Concerning about the exercise session , the learning method may change by discussion about the problems before start solving.Therefore,analytical capability is developed for the students. » (Large extent)
- Anders is a very good teacher, he explain the concepts very precisely, but negative feedback for tutor. » (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.28

- The course literature was excellent relative to its contents but there are some limitation as well.For example, there is no example within the chapters except exercise part.Moreover, at the end of the book, index is not included so that it is diffcult tpo find any particular topic or defination.» (Large extent)
- the book is very good and explain everything in very simple language. Big compliments » (Large extent)
- The book is alright but it lacks a list of contents though. Submitting the tutorial solutions is very good» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 7%
Rather well»5 35%
Very well»8 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Everything is posted on time and is very readable.» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 28%
Very good»9 64%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- Very good if we ask any question to Anders, else ...hummm rather poor.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 50%
Very well»5 35%
I did not seek cooperation»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.64

- Did the project alone.» (I did not seek cooperation)

11. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 57%
High»4 28%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

12. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»5 35%
High»5 35%
Too high»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- My other course had too little work» (Low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»1 7%
Good»7 50%
Excellent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- my overall impression of the course if good. excellent teaching, adequate laboration where we have really learn the practical stuffs, and rather poor tutorials.» (Good)
- Different terms are given the same symbol in different chapters of the textbook, hence contributing to my confusion at times. e.g. n can be refractive index, carrier concentration, energy level number... alpha can be absorption coefficient... too many efficiencies to handle too and the distinction between them is not too clear» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Pretty much everything I think.»
- the lectures. very informative and well taught. the labs have been good but rather long and too close to the end of the study period. They should be split into shorter labs and done at least a little earlier.»
- Method of teaching should be preserved as it is very clear and easy to follow.»
- teacher, the course material, and laboratory exercises. »
- the lecturer»
- some»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe add a little bit more on real applications, but other than that everything is good.»
- Though we have only 2 labs for this course,i think more labs are needed for better understanding clearly about the contents of the course. »
- the exercise classes. They were not all that useful.»
- tutor»
- the inadequacies in the textbook as described above»
- some»

16. Additional comments

- The teacher is excellent . i did not have this type of teacher in my life »
- I can recommend this course.»
- The given project should be experimental based rather than literature or collected information from different sources.Though, labs are included, the project should be related to those labs as well so that students may have good chance to find new things by doing project.»
- well, i guess, the time alloted to laboraty work is not sufficient to do all the excecises (4 hrs), like in light sources laboration, if LED and LASER section are divided in two lab. work, then i guess we would have beter apportunity to learn more.»
- none»

Kursutvärderingssystem från