Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Multimedia and video communications, SSY150, vt2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-05-13 - 2008-05-16
Antal svar: 22
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 33%
Kontaktperson: Madeleine Persson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

22 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»12 54%
Around 20 hours/week»3 13%
Around 25 hours/week»5 22%
Around 30 hours/week»1 4%
At least 35 hours/week»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- We spent 4 hours in the class and the rest working on assignments and studying.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

22 svarande

0%»1 4%
25%»1 4%
50%»3 13%
75%»6 27%
100%»11 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.13

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

22 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»4 18%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 4%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 31%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.04

- I couldn"t find the goals on the web page.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»3 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 84%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.84

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

21 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 14%
Yes, definitely»1 4%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»17 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

21 svarande

Small extent»5 23%
Some extent»7 33%
Large extent»8 38%
Great extent»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

22 svarande

Small extent»7 31%
Some extent»7 31%
Large extent»6 27%
Great extent»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.13

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

22 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 4%
Rather well»17 77%
Very well»4 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

9. How did you like the laboratory work/projects?

22 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 9%
Rather good»11 50%
Very good»9 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.31

- the projects are too basic...one person can do that...no need to do that in a group» (Rather poor)
- they seems a bit easier compare to other courses» (Rather good)

10. How did you like the teaching: lecture part?

22 svarande

Very poor»3 13%
Rather poor»9 40%
Rather good»8 36%
Very good»2 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- It was difficult for students with no comunication background to understand lectures.» (Rather poor)
- Boring.» (Rather poor)

11. How did you like the teaching: tutorial part?

21 svarande

Very poor»3 14%
Rather poor»5 23%
Rather good»10 47%
Very good»3 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

- Did not have tutorials» (Very poor)

Study climate

12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

22 svarande

Very poor»1 4%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 36%
Very good»8 36%
I did not seek help»5 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

22 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 4%
Rather well»11 50%
Very well»9 40%
I did not seek cooperation»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- After two labs we gained an inactive group member in our group that we never managed to get in hold of.» (Rather well)

14. How was the course workload?

22 svarande

Too low»2 9%
Low»4 18%
Adequate»12 54%
High»4 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

15. How was the total workload this study period?

22 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»5 22%
Adequate»10 45%
High»6 27%
Too high»1 4%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- Took three courses simultaneously this study period.» (High)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

22 svarande

Poor»3 13%
Fair»4 18%
Adequate»5 22%
Good»7 31%
Excellent»3 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The laboratory part»
- The laboratory projects. They are very helpful in understanding the theory learnt during the lectures. Also, it"s good to see that these practices have a real weight in the course grading.»
- the lab»
- The labs are good.»
- labs »
- Projects should be preserved.»
- the lab project, they r too easy for us i think. maybe the lab memo shouldn"t be too specific.»

18. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Might there be a cheaper course book, perhaps?»
- This course should not be presented to student that are studying communication.»
- Maybe the fact that all projects should be mandatory, since one of the projects was optional. In my opinion, since this course is heavily based in practice, I think all projects should be mandatory.»
- the projects...the projects are easy...try to increase the difficulty..other try to reduce the number of persons per group»
- the way of scoring the labs, it seems not fair »
- Hardware related Projects should also be introdeced.»
- lab memo»

19. Additional comments

- This course should be presented only to signal and systems department students.»
- Industrial visits for motivation.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från