ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

0708-1 Human Computer Interaction, TDA288

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2007-10-15 - 2007-11-04
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»6 30%
Around 20 hours/week»9 45%
Around 25 hours/week»2 10%
Around 30 hours/week»2 10%
At least 35 hours/week»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- About halv that.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»4 20%
50%»5 25%
75%»7 35%
100%»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Collision with an other course.» (25%)
- I did not attend all lectures as I generally prefer self-studying. The lectures I chose to attend seemed important from my perspective.» (25%)
- Was unable to attend two three lectures because of other appointments.» (75%)
- 90%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 25%
The goals are difficult to understand»2 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 35%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.06

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

17 svarande

No, not at all»1 5%
To some extent»7 41%
Yes, definitely»6 35%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 17%

Genomsnitt: 2.64

- The time provided for the exam (4 hours) did not seem adequate to me - I could have used an extra hour to complete all questions.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»5 25%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»7 35%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- I found the lectures I attended to be very helpful.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

19 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»9 47%
Large extent»8 42%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

- The course book - Interaction Design –, Beyond human-computer interaction - is an excellent book and very helpful.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»2 10%
Rather badly»4 20%
Rather well»10 50%
Very well»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Some leborations worked ok but some were uniterpertable.» (Very badly)
- I felt however that the laboratory assignment handouts could have been published on the course a couple of days prior to the lab instead of the evening before. It would have helped to prepare for the lab slightly better. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 15%
Rather good»6 30%
Very good»8 40%
I did not seek help»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.55

- Specially in Labs» (Rather poor)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»6 30%
Very well»14 70%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.7

11. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 10%
Adequate»14 70%
High»4 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.1

- 700 page book that does not have enough practical and useful information inside» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»13 65%
High»7 35%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»3 15%
Fair»7 35%
Adequate»3 15%
Good»6 30%
Excellent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I did not really learn anything useful. It felt more like I was forced into complicated desing structures rather then actually getting any better understanding of human computer interaction.» (Poor)
- Some labs are diffuse.» (Good)
- The subject in itself is very interesting. I felt however that there could have been a concluding lecture at the end of the course to tie up all the topics covered in the course to provide some sort of an overview. At some point during the course perhaps there could have been some mention of what opportunities there are of pursuing a career in interaction design - particularly in Sweden - and how to go about it. » (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab groups are good,some excersizes are good»
- labs»
- more litretures and more team working.»
- The structure of the course and the labs. »
- The book.»
- the labs, but »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- the labs were very poorly written and sometimes you had problems understanding on what to do.»
- The labs need to be reformulated.»
- way of teaching»
- Lecturer and the question paper style»
- Better planning of the laborations. Make sure they can be done within the time frame, because this time we were not even close to be done during those three hours. Do not demand students to answer too much on the exercises when you demand that the answers should be short.»
- lectures should be more comprehensive,Lab teacher should be prepared,Book should be changes or emphesize in impportant parts»
- Preferably the english of the tutors and those responsible for the course»
- Most of the couse. The lectures should be clearer and more to the point and the laborations should easily understandable. (That does not mean that they have to be easy to complete, only that the assignment should be clear.)»
- nothing»
- I think the book was really booring, »
- I think the course book is too much for one quarter.»
- As mentioned above (in question 13) a concluding lecture and mention/information of how to pursue a career in interaction design. »
- The Lab PMs. They are horrible. Filled with incorrect english and hard to enterpret. At least the last two. Labs should be made harder and doing them should be enough to pass the course.»
- The teacher should focus more on the red thread of a lecture. Itäs easy happen that times goes by when she comes in on other subjects/stuff.»

16. Additional comments

- Teaching was extremely poor. whether the teaching methodolgy should be change or the teacher»
- I think this could be a great couse if done correctly. The subject is really interesting but, I did not learn anything in this couse that would help me make a better user interface.»
- An improvement may be to increase the number of interactive devices made available during the lab sessions. Presently there are too few devices and hence lead to very large groups that don"t function very well. Another improvement may be to increase the maximum number of pages on the lab report to 3 (from 2) - I have felt that I needed at least 3 pages to write each report to answer the questions fully and to my satisfaction. »
- The subject is interesting but the course was a bit of a let down. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från