ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

pcod08, EDA 281

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-04-23 - 2008-05-12
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 92%
Kontaktperson: Thomas Lundqvist»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 53%
Around 20 hours/week»3 23%
Around 25 hours/week»3 23%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.69

- Reading the **** book probably took 20 of those ... » (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»2 15%
50%»1 7%
75%»5 38%
100%»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 4

- missed some early morning» (75%)
- 100% miuns the occasional lecture at 8. » (100%)
- of what was given » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 15%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 46%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- Obviously know the goals within the scope of the first lecture but can"t remember many details many weeks after the course ended.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 38%
Yes, definitely»5 38%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.84

- Some desired parts of the lectures/book wasn"t part of the exam. » (To some extent)
- Not familiar enough with official goals but the exam clearly covered the course while still leaving out excessive details.» (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)
- got sick » (I don"t know/have not been examined yet)

6. Did the course meet your expectations in terms of goals and contents?

13 svarande

Not at all»1 7%
To some extent»10 76%
Yes, definitely»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- It"s a bit more abstract than expected at places early on and obviously a lot of extra detail regarding fairly old implementations of parallel computers.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»3 23%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»8 61%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

8. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»4 30%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.23

- badly written book....too verbose» (Small extent)
- But only since I took the time to really read the book. Most of it anyways. But now afterwards, I"m not sure it was worth it. » (Large extent)
- read the book.» (Great extent)

9. Did the laboratory exercises help you understand the content better?

13 svarande

Not at all»1 7%
To some extent»7 53%
Yes, definitely»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- But, lectures and labs are more complementary than necessary building on each other without necessarily being a bad thing» (Yes, definitely)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»4 30%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.61

Study climate

11. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 15%
Rather good»6 46%
Very good»4 30%
I did not seek help»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

12. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 15%
Rather well»8 61%
Very well»3 23%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

13. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 84%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- Became a bit much because of reading 3 courses at the same time though, not really an issue» (Adequate)
- Again -- Book» (High)

14. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»6 46%
High»4 30%
Too high»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- see above» (High)
- 3 courses so » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

15. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»2 15%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»3 23%
Good»8 61%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.3

- Could be some addtional focus in the software aspects. » (Good)

16. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- openmp was good to know after all. »
- Thomas should supervise the labs. He did that very well.»
- Thomas Lundqvist.»
- Contents were good. »
- the open MP programing »

17. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The book: too old and too big.»
- More robust lab codebase. Preferably a connection to a modern perallel computer like a modern small scale dual socket multicore as well as cover modern super computer and cluster without imposing too much on the rest of the course timewise. Just asking for a better bridge between the book and the situation today.»
- The labs were somewhat just click and wait. Does not feel so satisfying running the same code with different inputs on different configs when the runtime is so long. A lot of time is spent waiting and does not leave enough for analysis.»
- Course Book (its very abstract) More exercise sessions»
- »

18. Additional comments

Kursutvärderingssystem från