|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Energy Systems Modelling –, from industrial to global scale, FENM110Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2015-12-09 - 2015-12-18 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 100% Kontaktperson: Niclas Mattsson»
General questions1. What is your overall impression of the course?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - A good mix of literature seminaries, lectures, theory, modelling, assignments. » (very good) 2. Was the course announced in a timely fashion so you could plan your autumn semester?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - The workload was not clear before the first assignment. The implementation of the first assignment was very stressful. After the first assignment, it became possible to make a better timeplan for the rest of the assignments.» (yes) 3. How well do the above learning goals reflect the content of the course?You can find the learning goals in the Course PM here:http://213.65.138.39/CoursePM.pdf 8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 4. How well were the learning goals fulfilled?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.5 5. How appropriate was the general course structure (lectures, literature seminars and modeling assignments)?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - Good mix of theory, discussions and applying the knowledge.» (very good) 6. What is your general impression of the literature seminars (choice of literature and value of discussion)?Feel free to comment on individual seminars in the comment box.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - Sometimes the articles were hard to grasp when you did not have an background. It would be good to get questions before(which we did in some cases) to know what to focus on. The explanation of marginal electricity for that seminar was very good to have before reading the articles.» (good) What is your impression of the main blocks of the course?7. Course introduction. Lectures: Energy modeling history, model classification and system boundaries (Fredrik Hedenus)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.4 8. Lectures: Energy economics and energy in the process industry. Assignment: Retrofit options in a process industry (Matteo Morandin)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.16 - It seemed as if Matteo did not really prepare for his lecture but just copied a (longer) lecture from a different course, which led to timing problems. Interesting topic nonetheless, even if I did not see why it should be included in a modelling course. » (fair) 9. Lectures: Linear programming, shadow prices and advanced optimization techniques. Assignment: District heating in LPtown. (Niclas Mattsson)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - maybe seperate the introduction on how to use gams from the actual assingment a bit more» (very good) 10. Lecture: System simplifications. Assignment: Electricity dispatch in southern Sweden using both a simulation and an optimization model (Lisa Göransson)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - i think it was userful to start with the assignment in the course and have possibility to discuss, but then it might be nice also to be able to have a look at it before the lecture, to get an overview of what we will be doing and start thinking a bit and not see it the first time and start right away» (very good) 11. Lecture: Endogenous learning (experience curves) in energy system models. Assignment: Investment model for electricity in southern Sweden with future uncertainty (Mikael Odenberger)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.75 - i think it was userful to start with the assignment in the course and have possibility to discuss, but then it might be nice also to be able to have a look at it before the lecture, to get an overview of what we will be doing and start thinking a bit and not see it the first time and start right away» (very good) 12. Lecture: Allocation of scarce resources and scarcity rents. Assignment: Global energy system modeling (Fredrik Hedenus)8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.37 - was a little bit hard to practically use concepts like scarcity rent in the model - maybe a bit more guidelines how to understand the model» (good) A few final questions13. What should be preserved for the next round of the course?- All. Very good course.»- The time slots for the lectures was good. There was enough time to complete the assignments in a satisfactory manner. This should be preserved.» - different lecturers with different focus and concepts in their presentation and assignments a lot of practical work in the assignments to actively use what we learn» - Almost all of it! » - Number of assignments. Literature seminars.» - The general structure and topics concerning modelling.» 14. What should be changed for the next round of the course?- The communication after the assigned time was a bit of a problem. I did not receive answer to some of my emails when I got stuck with assignments. It might not be possible for everyone to come by personally to ask questions. It would be helpful if all the teachers are available on emails also.»- for some of the assignments in the middle/end there was not a lot of time before the seminar» - Better description of assignment questions (specially for assignment 5) Having more comment lines in the model code,e.g. to add units in the comments, helps students understand the model.» - Perhaps have 4 hour hours without lunch break (either morning or afternoon). Add some scheduled time to get started with the calculations in assigment 1 and modeling implementation in the other assignments. » - Timing between time consuming assignments and comparatively easy ones. Not so intense report writing but, instead, more discussions.» - First lecture. Try to take into account more that not everyone is familiar with GAMS. Harmonize time budgets for different tasks. Ask questions in the tasks more clearly. » 15. Was the difficulty level of the course appropriate?Please mention in the comment box if any individual elements of the course were significantly easier or more difficult than others.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - It was some challenges but not something that could not be solved eventually.» (appropriate) 16. How useful was the course for your PhD research?Please mention in the comment box if any individual elements of the course were significantly less or more useful for you than others.8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - Very usefull in a sence of general knowledge of the research area. Some parts of the course can absolutely be applied to my research.» (somewhat useful) 17. Additional comments (about anything)- really interesting course :)»Thank you for taking the time to help us improve the course!
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%