|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Learning and Leading in Dysfunctional Organizations 2014-15, TEK451Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2015-01-02 - 2015-01-15 Antal svar: 11 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 78% Kontaktperson: Jan Wickenberg» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Overall1. What is your general impression of the course?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.63 - I really liked the lecture and the teacher"s anecdotes. » (Good) 2. The Pre-readingsMatrisfråga- I found he pre readings a little too much. » I put lots of effort in the preparatory work
Genomsnitt: 2.63 The preparatory work made me learn much about the topic
Genomsnitt: 2.63 The preparatory work made me learn the reflective writing style (required for the Home Exams)
Genomsnitt: 3.18 3. The LessonsThis was a good lectureMatrisfråga - Maybe for increasing the exchange and activity in the class as a whole a more directive and coaching style would have helped.» The lessons helped me understand the topic well
Genomsnitt: 1.9 I would have preferred a more directive, lecturing style
Genomsnitt: 3.9 I would have preferred a more reactive, coaching style
Genomsnitt: 3 4. The course textbook Mullins (2010) Management & Organisational BehaviourMatrisfråga- I dont know if the book needs revision because i have not read it.it was verk difficult to understand that book so i decided to use alternative litterature.» I learnt a lot from the textbook
Genomsnitt: 3.11 (I bought a copy) The book is good value for my money
Genomsnitt: 3.33 The book needs major revisions for its next edition
Genomsnitt: 3.28 5. The course administrationMatrisfråga- The hand-out and hand-in categories in the Ping-pong interface was somehow a little confusing for me in the beginning. » Having the course schedule as an iCalendar subscription file was useful to me
Genomsnitt: 2 The on-line web schedule was useful to me
Genomsnitt: 2.09 The hand-out section was kept relevant
Genomsnitt: 1.45 The Ping Pong user interface makes it easy to get what I am looking for
Genomsnitt: 2.27 6. The course locationThe course was held mainly in KS1. What do you think about the room and its location?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.09 - It was good for this group size.» (It worked fine) Chalmers standard questions7. How was the course workload?11 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.81 - We were given an appropriate amount of time for preparatory tasks and exams. I would not have minded some more interesting litterature or some more developing hand-ins though.» (Low) 8. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The discussion between the students Worked in small group»- The anecdotes and analogies. The style of the home-exam. Analysis of movies and real life examples. » - The lecture style» - Good lectures, Jan, "tips for the future"» - How the lectures were carried out. » - The teacher» - Jan, the anecdotes, his enthusiasm. The hand-ins, a really good preperation for the home exams and to develop a reflective writing style The feedback on all the writing The beehives, us writing our beehive conclusions on the board, with following discussion The extra time for end-term exam, made it easier to schedule in combination with other courses.» - The commitment of the teacher. The anecdotes!» - The lecturer, the lecture style, the book, the texts, the type of assignments. Everything was good.» 9. What should definitely be changed to next year?- I do not know, I like this course like that...»- More references to theories in the book. To many textes in the middle-exam. » - When the feedback on the mid-term exam is delivered. Would be more useful to get it earlier.» - Nothing relly» - The book» - More writing, small hand-ins every week. Reflective questions in addition to the pre-reading. Spoken requirements of us comming up with questions or solutions for next lecture in addition to the pre-reading.» - Questions to think about after reading a text before lecture. More assignments to train analyzing skills?» - As I"ve mentioned above. I would have liked some more hand-ins to learn more about a reflective writing style. I would also like to have looked at the same problem with some different models (one at a time) in order to learn how apply them and their views, as well as getting more depth into my analysis. It would also have been nice to learn how to analyse deeply and show it in the text, without running out of pages (write short and still reflective).» 10. Additional comments- It would have been interesting to read other studens mid-term exams and maybe give feedback to them. Would be good with more materials on the web if someone missed a lecture.»- The PowerPoint presentations doesn"t tell me anything. They are awesome for someone WHO has read relevant litterature lika Jan but for me as a student is just a reference list that i should read. The home exam was very intresting and i loved it» - The class wasn´,t that talkative. Could it have helped the atmosphere if we introduced ourselves?»
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%