ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Objektorienterad programvaruutveckling, DIT011

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2015-01-19 - 2015-02-08
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 12%
Kontaktperson: Eirin Bakken»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»4 36%
Around 20 hours/week»6 54%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- All labs or home studies, only attended three lectures.» (Around 20 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»2 20%
25%»4 40%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 40%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

- 87%» (?)
- I attend some of the first classes (maybe two or three) but discovered the inferior quality in the teachings and decided to get information from the internet. » (0%)
- All labs, three lectures.» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»6 54%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 9%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 36%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- Yeah, but I as new "program-student" got the problem with time on the exam. Did not have the time to get truth every problem.» (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»6 54%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- Lab helpers were phenomenal, nothing to complain about. The teacher was not as helpful.» (Some extent) (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.45

- The course literature was horrible and somewhat outdated. IT is an area that develops at extreme speeds and I did not get the feeling that the course literature had been developed in the same way. » (Small extent)
- Learnt most online.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3.18

- I mean, seriously. It"s 2015, the webpages looks like something from the early 90s and the labs haven"t been updated for years and years (and no, it can"t be because they work so well because they don"t and never has been).» (Very badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 36%
Very good»5 45%
I did not seek help»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Kunde ibland ta över en timma att få hjälp vid labb-tillfällena.» (Rather good)
- Good in the start of the course, but got worse when more ppl took place and "paniced" for their owns laborations, then the help actually got very bad.» (Rather good)
- Labsessions were good and the help teachers were very understanding for the poor quality in handout material etc. » (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 9%
Rather well»5 45%
Very well»5 45%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

11. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 63%
High»3 27%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- Jag gjorde inte alla övningsuppgifter, men labbarna var väldigt olika. 3e labben (sudoku) var väldigt mycket svårare än de andra. Lite som att gå in i en vägg först. . .» (Adequate)
- Many of us are beginners when starting this course. This doesn"t seem to be respected. » (Too high)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 36%
High»5 45%
Too high»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»1 9%
Fair»1 9%
Adequate»1 9%
Good»7 63%
Excellent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.54 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Fire is a good way to handle assignments»
- Nothing.»
- The labs were fun and helpful when learning. Some labs like the Memory/Sudoku should be kept. Something fun for the students to make as well as learn from. »
- Handledarna.»
- Lab helpers. Alexander and Anton were great. When you asked for help they led you toward the answer, they didn"t blurt it right out.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Sista tentafrågan var en fråga som vi inte alls labbat på, utan endast sett exempel och funnits uppgifter i boken. Vore bra om man involverade lite enkel grafik (som efterfrågades i den uppgiften) på lab 2 och 4 kanske, dessa var ändå labbar som var ganska enkla och gick snabbt, sen eventuellt ta bort någon del från labb 3, som tog lika mycket tid som lab 1,2 och 4 tillsammans.»
- Labs, main teacher.»
- More evolved excersises lessons, the two students who are the laborations-leaders should be more prepaired for these lessons. More then half of the excersises were skipped because of problems in the logistics. Maybe more leaded classes where they present the solution for us after some time, and talk more about it, otherwise students get passive!»
- The lectures could be a bit more interesting. »
- Labbarna hade blivit bättre om handledarna hade fått komma på labbarna. De nuvarande labbarna är flera år gamla, och vissa saker är lite outdated.»
- The teacher» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)

16. Additional comments

- I have extensive experience (3+ years as work) in java, so the course was very easy for me. So my metrics are not very good»
- I had high expectations on quality studying at Chalmers/University of Gothenburg. These expectations was far from fulfilled in this course and I would not recommend anyone taking this course at Chalmers / UG.»
- No extra comments.»
- ming noone understood him the first time, while the majority of us actually did understand him. I do want to emphasize again that i am certain he meant well, it just didn"t come out the way he wanted it. Positive things: The labs chosen for us were really good for learning and fit our level perfectly. Maybe Alexander or Anton should rewrite the instructions though. Book was alright but it would definetly be better in english, as it"s hard to know what to google for if you want to know more. Exceptions were written as "Exceptionella händelser" in the book. Whle this example specifically would probably not be too bothersome to look up, it"s just an example.»
- Where to begin. It really shows that the teacher"s heart is at the right place, but his teaching methods are really discouraging. There are alot of wierd instructions in the lab instructions and at some places they were just wrong. He claimed things to be/do what they did not do. During lectures he spoke as if, as i felt it, we were stupid. You sat there and felt as if he thinks you"re really stupid. He gets stuck at too trivial matters and explains the same things over and over again, assuming noone understood him the first time, while the majority of us actually did understand him. I do want to emphasize again that i am certain he meant well, it just didn"t come out the way he wanted it. Positive things: The labs chosen for us were really good for learning and fit our level perfectly. Maybe Alexander or Anton should rewrite the instructions though. Book was alright but it would definetly be better in english, as it"s hard to know what to google for if you want to know more. Exceptions were written as "Exceptionella händelser" in the book. Whle this example specifically would probably not be too bothersome to look up, it"s just an example.» (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
- Läraren löste ett problem med en gruppsituation med bravur. Och har också ett vänligt sätt som är uppskattat. Vi hade mest med Alexander att göra, och han upplevde jag som duktig och väldigt uppoffrande för studenterna. » (den här kommentaren har blivit redigerad i efterhand)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.54
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.54
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.63

Kursutvärderingssystem från