ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Internal Combustion Engines, Advanced Course 2014, MTF225

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2014-06-06 - 2014-06-13
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Petter Dahlander»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Course administration and information

1. Where the goals of the course clear after reading the course PM and the information on the course web page?

7 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Very good»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.28

- The intended learning outcomes provided for the first few lectures were a great help, would have been great to have a document like that for each lecture!» (Good)

2. Did you find the course web page satisfactory?

7 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Very good»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

3. Was the course PM satisfactory?

7 svarande

Not good»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Very good»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

Learning

4. Where the goals of the course fulfilled?

7 svarande

No»0 0%
Almost»1 14%
Yes»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

5. Do you consider that you had good pre-knowledge?

7 svarande

Not at all, I missed a lot»0 0%
Yes»3 42%
Yes, definitely»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

6. Which parts of the course were difficult/easy?

- Some of the guest lectures contained material that was very extensive and too detailed for the course level. However, I personally was very interested in these topics and appreciate the extra information.»
- All parts of the course were equally difficult.»
- assignments were easy. the lectures on engine management were difficult»

7. Is it clear what your knowledge from the course can be used for?

7 svarande

No»0 0%
Almost»1 14%
Yes»6 85%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- In this course we were provided with lots of useful information.» (Yes)

8. Did you find the course to be scheduled right in time in the global course plan?

7 svarande

Yes»7 100%
No, too early»0 0%
No, too late»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

9. Did you find the "suggested readings" uploaded to the web page helpful? (for the engine modeling lectures)

7 svarande

Yes»4 57%
No»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 1.42

- Some steps for seting the model properties could be described more clearly. » (Yes)
- I did not read them.» (No)

Lectures

10. What did you think about the lectures as a whole?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 28%
Good»2 28%
Very good»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- I did not attend many lectures.» (Ok)
- Maybe changing professor every lecture can create little problems following the stream of concepts, due to different way to speak and behave of different professors.» (Ok)
- Overall interesting and enjoyable lectures, although there were some overlap between lecturers from the to time.» (Good)
- Especially the charging lecture was very beneficial.» (Very good)

11. How many lectures did you go to?

7 svarande

0-20%»1 14%
20-40%»1 14%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»1 14%
80-100%»4 57%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- As a part of Chalmers Formula Student, it is unfortunate that I could not attend most of the lectures. My response to the previous question is based on the few lectures that I had the opportunity to attend. I was very satisfied.» (20-40%)

12. If you did not go to the lectures, what was the reason?

- I usually do not go to a lot of lectures.»
- Chalmers formula Student.»
- an illness»

13. How did you like the lectures by Petter Dahlander?

(Engine modeling, GDI Combustion systems part 1 & 2, Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD))

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 42%
Good»2 28%
Very good»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- engine modeling was not very clear to me but the rest was good» (Ok)
- Petter"s information is thoroughly engrossing. His delivering the lecture ensures that the listener"s interest is maintained throughout.» (Very good)

14. How did you like the lectures by Arjan Helmantel?

(Gas exchange/charge motion, Engine operating characteristics

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 33%
Good»3 50%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

15. How did you like the lectures by Monica Johansson?

(Alternative fuels)

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»4 66%
Good»1 16%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

16. How did you like the lectures by Mats Andersson?

(Optical measurement methods)

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 50%
Good»2 33%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

17. How did you like the lectures by Sven Andersson?

CI: Sprays & Combustion in diesel engines

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 50%
Good»0 0%
Very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4

18. How did you like the lectures by Anders Karlsson?

CFD in development of combustion systems

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»4 66%
Good»1 16%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

19. How did you like the lectures by Lennarth Zander?

Charging SI and CI engines, part1 & 2.

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 33%
Good»1 16%
Very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

20. How did you like the lectures by Daniel Lundberg?

CI: Engine Control.

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 16%
Ok»2 33%
Good»1 16%
Very good»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

- too many schemes which could not be explained over the lecture.» (Poor)

21. How did you like the lectures by Ingemar Denbratt?

CI: Development Trends

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 40%
Good»2 40%
Very good»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- could not attend to» (?)

22. How did you like the lectures by Magnus Skoglund?

Exhaust aftertreatment.

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 33%
Good»2 33%
Very good»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

Design task

23. What did you think about the design task as a whole?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»5 83%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

24. How many GT-Power exercises did you go to?

6 svarande

0-20%»1 16%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 16%
60-80%»0 0%
80-100%»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 4

25. What did you think about the GT-Power software?

6 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»1 16%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»3 50%
80-100%»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

- powerful tool for the engine development» (80-100%)

26. What did you think about Salman Arshad"s supervision?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 16%
Good»2 33%
Very good»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

- I guess he tried, but setes I was hard to get any useful help from him, also, the presentation session could have been better organized!» (Ok)
- he was helpful and took time for us» (Good)
- he provided me with useful advices» (Very good)

27. What did you think about Boxiong Chen"s supervision?

6 svarande

Very poor»2 33%
Poor»3 50%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Very good»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- Non existent! He spent all his time following Salman around!» (Very poor)
- I actually saw him seldom» (Poor)
- could not answer the quesions in sufficient way maybe due to less experience.» (Poor)

Course Literature

28. What did you think about the Heywood book?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»1 14%
Ok»0 0%
Good»3 42%
Very good»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- too old and long winded» (Poor)
- good but the electronic version is quite old.» (Good)
- the book is not used much in the course.» (Good)

29. What did you think about the lecture handouts (pdf:s uploaded to coarse home page)?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 14%
Good»4 57%
Very good»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- several lectures should provide more theoretical background» (Good)

Your work

30. How many hours per week did you spend for this course?

7 svarande

<15 h»2 28%
Ca 20 h»2 28%
Ca 25 h»3 42%
Ca 30 h»0 0%
> 35 h»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

31. How many percent of the time for the coarse did you spend on the design tasks?

- 40%»
- 70»
- 60»
- 70»

32. Are you satisfied with the possibilities to get help?

- yes»
- yes»
- adequate»
- Ok!»
- yes»

The exam.

33. Do you think that the exam reflected the course well?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 16%
Good»3 50%
Very good»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.16

Summary

34. What did you think about the course as a whole?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»4 57%
Very good»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

35. What parts of the course should be kept to next year?

- The GT Power assignment is an excellent method of providing an understanding of engine modelling to a beginner. Continuing the modelling through the duration of the Engines course allowed us to become much more familiar with the How and Why by making our own experiments and investigations with the model.»
- charging of si and ci engines»
- The design tasks in gt power»
- design tasks which can be more detailed. »

36. What should be changed for next year?

- The engine modeling»
- A bit better organization of the design tasks...»
- more lectures on recent technologies.»

37. General comments

- really satisfied with the course. good job!!!»
- As a whole, an Interesting and good course!»

Kursutvärderingssystem från