ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Project in Applied Mechanics TME130 - Extended evaluation 2014, TME130

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2014-06-05 - 2014-09-14
Antal svar: 17
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Mikael Enelund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

17 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»3 17%
Around 25 hours/week»2 11%
Around 30 hours/week»5 29%
At least 35 hours/week»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- Even in holidays and weekends.» (At least 35 hours/week)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

2. How understandable are the course goals?

The course PM states:

After completion of this course, you should:
o be able to demonstrate capability to master problems with open solutions spaces this includes handle uncertainties and limited information,
o be able to apply previously learned theory, simulation methods and tools to handle industrial mechanical engineering problems,
o be able to create appropriate simulations models and experiments to solve a specific simulations problem,
o be able to use Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) tools to simulate product or device performances,
o be able o plan and carry out advanced tasks within specified time frames,
o show insight and ability to work in teams and collaborate in groups with different compositions, and
o be able to give written and oral presentations of a larger technical investigation.

17 svarande

No idea what they mean»0 0%
A bit fuzzy»3 17%
Understandable»6 35%
Crystal clear»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

3. To which extent have you established the knowledge and skills that the goals state?

17 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 23%
Most of it»12 70%
Perfectly»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.82

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

17 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»16 94%
No, the goals are set too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.05

- For the time frame given I would say that it is a bit to much if the problem formulation is too open. You can do most of the other points quite extensive if you have the possibility to start working from week one and not in week three.» (No, the goals are set too high)

Teaching and course administration

5. Which project did you work with and to which extent do you think your project task was aligned with the course goals?

Matrisfråga

- Well aligned but to comprehensive.»

Plastic bottle
0 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»0 0%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

Box girder beam
3 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»0 0%
Perfect match»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Vera monocoque
3 svarande

Not at all»1 33%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»2 66%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

Wind turbine blade - simplified model
3 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»3 100%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Wind turbine blade - core material failure
4 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»1 25%
Well»1 25%
Perfect match»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Platooning
2 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»1 50%
Perfect match»1 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Active flow control
1 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»1 100%
Well»0 0%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Fluidized bed
1 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»0 0%
Perfect match»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

6. Which project did you work with and how do you rate the supervision within the project?

Matrisfråga

- The contact with the supervisors was mostly with the supervisor of the company involved»

Plastic bottle
0 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 0

Box girder beam
3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»3 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Vera monocoque
3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 33%
Good»1 33%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3

Wind turbine blade - simplified model
4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 25%
Good»2 50%
Excellent»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3

Wind turbine blade - core material failure
3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»3 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Platooning
2 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»2 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Active flow control
1 svarande

Poor»1 100%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1

Fluidized bed
1 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»1 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

7. How do you rate the planning report review session?

16 svarande

Poor»1 6%
Ok»3 18%
Good»11 68%
Excellent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

- I could not attend.» (Good)

8. How do you rate the final presentation session?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 17%
Good»10 58%
Excellent»4 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

9. What is your impression of the oral and written opposition?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»4 23%
Good»8 47%
Excellent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- Fluid vs. fluid and solid vs. solid. Also would be better to have examiner from fluid department.» (Ok)
- It could have been clearer that we wouldn"t get the written opposition from the opposing team. I thought we would get it.» (Good)
- I think it"s good to practice on reading and questioning technical reports.» (Excellent)

10. How do you rate the generic skills lectures (project management and reporting)?

17 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 11%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»6 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.23

- Good but there were a lot of repetition from previous courses (IKOT and bachelor thesis)» (Good)

11. How do you rate the ANSYS guest lecture?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»6 37%
Good»10 62%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- I did not attend.» (Ok)
- Good but since we had to work with FEMAP we didn"t have much use of that.» (Good)
- I didn"t participate. It did not seem important to our project and we had a lot of other things to do.» (Good)

12. What do you think of the opportunity to anonymously grade your fellow team members? Please comment whether the critera were helpful or not?

17 svarande

Bad»0 0%
Indifferent»10 58%
Good»7 41%

Genomsnitt: 2.41

- It would have been good to see the criteria early in the course so that you knew what was graded» (Indifferent)
- The criteria did not help me. I graded according to my overall gut feeling.» (Indifferent)
- The difference between the levels were to small. Some of them were almost identical for 5, 4 and 3 and then for fail the difference was huge.» (Indifferent)
- criteria was somewhat helpful» (Indifferent)
- It felt like the criterias did not help much. Maybe one criteria could be how much time the persons spent on the project? Because that differed in our group.» (Indifferent)
- They were helpful» (Good)
- Its a good way of letting the examinors know if someone did not contribute enough. The criterion were quite helpful.» (Good)

13. What do you think of the feedback session? Please comment

17 svarande

Unnecessary»0 0%
Necessary but could be improved»5 29%
Valuable»7 41%
Priceless»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The individual part was a bit rushed and may either be skipped or extended» (Valuable)
- Could be longer» (Priceless)
- Really nice. However, I was surprised we didn"t get the report with corrections from examinors and the written opposition from opposing team.» (Priceless)

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

17 svarande

Poor»2 11%
Ok»3 17%
Good»4 23%
Excellent»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- The lack of FEMAP knowledge at chalmers and in most of the world made it hard to get pass basic problems» (Poor)
- Hardly tried to ask any questions or getting any help from the supervisors on Chalmers.» (Excellent)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Ok»1 5%
Good»7 41%
Excellent»8 47%

Genomsnitt: 3.29

- It was very interesting/fun to work with new people with similar backgrounds.» (Excellent)

Summarizing questions

16. What is your general impression of the course?

17 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»1 5%
Good»9 52%
Excellent»5 29%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

- Excellent now that it"s done. During the project I felt we had a lot to do and maybe we spent more time than we should have.» (Excellent)

17. Additional comments

- See previous evaluation »

Kursutvärderingssystem från