Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Data structures DIT960, Lp 4 Vt14, DIT960
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2014-05-28 - 2014-09-12 Antal svar: 19 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Åsa Samdell»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.19 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 5 | | 26% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 11 | | 57% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 2 | | 10% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 1 | | 5% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.94 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 19 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 2 | | 10% |
50%» | | 1 | | 5% |
75%» | | 8 | | 42% |
100%» | | 8 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 4.15 - Attended to all lectures but no exercises.
Prefer to do it at home.» (50%)
- I only missed classes when I was sick or had other apointments» (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?19 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 3 | | 15% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 4 | | 21% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 12 | | 63% |
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - Good job by the assisstant, helpful» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 5% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 16 | | 94% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.94 - Simple java and haskell knowledge was needed, which I had studied in previous courses.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)
5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?17 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 5 | | 29% |
Yes, definitely» | | 11 | | 64% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 2.76
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?19 svarande
Small extent» | | 1 | | 5% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 15% |
Large extent» | | 10 | | 52% |
Great extent» | | 5 | | 26% |
Genomsnitt: 3 - Nick is a great teacher.» (Great extent)
- excellent» (Great extent)
7. Was there enough lab supervision?19 svarande
No» | | 3 | | 15% |
Yes» | | 16 | | 84% |
Genomsnitt: 1.84 - I never needed any help so yes.» (Yes)
- Did never need supervision» (Yes)
- not much lab supervision needed. Relativly simple labs, when I needed hep I got the help I needed» (Yes)
8. If there were optional exercise sessions, would you have gone?19 svarande
Definitely not» | | 1 | | 5% |
Probably not» | | 8 | | 42% |
Probably» | | 6 | | 31% |
Definitely» | | 4 | | 21% |
Genomsnitt: 2.68 9. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?19 svarande
Small extent» | | 6 | | 31% |
Some extent» | | 7 | | 36% |
Large extent» | | 6 | | 31% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - Nice slides!» (Large extent)
10. Did you find the course book useful?19 svarande
Not at all useful» | | 1 | | 5% |
Not very useful» | | 1 | | 5% |
Quite useful» | | 7 | | 36% |
Very useful» | | 1 | | 5% |
Didn"t buy the book» | | 9 | | 47% |
Genomsnitt: 3.84 - I didn"t need to use the book very much, but when I did it was helpful.» (Quite useful)
- the code was good» (Quite useful)
- I did not use the book at all. We learned everything we needed from lectures and Internet.» (Didn"t buy the book)
11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?18 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 8 | | 44% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 55% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 - Fire had some issues regarding of download the files after you submitted them (if you wanted to fix something at home, then it wasn"t possible to get the files from the FIRE)» (Rather well)
Study climate12. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?19 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 5% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 10% |
Very good» | | 10 | | 52% |
I did not seek help» | | 6 | | 31% |
Genomsnitt: 4.1 13. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?19 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 5% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 7 | | 36% |
Very well» | | 10 | | 52% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.52 - Other students are quiet and boring.» (Very poorly)
14. How was the course workload?18 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 5% |
Low» | | 4 | | 22% |
Adequate» | | 11 | | 61% |
High» | | 2 | | 11% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.77 - The last lab had some stress involved.» (Adequate)
15. How was the total workload this study period?19 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 3 | | 15% |
Adequate» | | 9 | | 47% |
High» | | 6 | | 31% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 5% |
Genomsnitt: 3.26 - It was high compared to other periods.» (Adequate)
Summarizing questions16. What is your general impression of the course?19 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 15% |
Good» | | 7 | | 36% |
Excellent» | | 9 | | 47% |
Genomsnitt: 4.31 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Great course & great teachers, both Nick and Evgeny.» (Excellent)
- Very important aspects of how to store data, and how efficent they are.» (Excellent)
- stuff made sense» (Excellent)
17. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Nick»
- Nick was a good teacher and the slides was very good. A fun course.»
- The live demonstrations of programs (java, haskell). Much better than showing slides.»
- The assignments.»
- The labs»
- the lectures»
- Length of the exam ( I actually had time to answer the questions to my satisfaction).»
- slides and Nick Smallbone»
- I do not know.»
18. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Nothing»
- The labs should be out earlier so if we are done we can start with the next.»
- The format of the exam»
- it was good as it was.»
- Excercises should be more encouraged»
- I have no idea.»
- Perhaps a faster pace in class, you dont need five classes in complexity, could be covered in two.»
19. Additional comments- High quality course. Good job.»
- I thought the lectures were a bit slow. Especially the examples like manually sorting a list. They often took too much time for what they showed.»
- not really.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.31
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.31 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|