Visa resultat

Chalmers Masters Programme Evaluation 2014

Masters Programme

1. Architecture and Civil Engineering

Architecture and urban design»		30		17%
Architecture and Engineering»		2		1%
Design and Construction Project Management»		22		13%
Design for Sustainable Development»		30		17%
Geo and Water Engineering»		1		0%
Infrastructure and environmental engineering»		33		19%
Sound and Vibration»		13		7%
Structural Engineering and Building Technology»		36		21%

Genomsnitt: 4.8

2. Bioscience, Molecular science and Chemical Engineering - Master"s Programme with language of instruction

Bioinformatics and System Biology»		0		0%
Biotechnology»		21		48%
Chemistry and Bioscience»		1		2%
Innovative and Sustainable Chemical Engineering»		17		39%
Lärande och Ledarskap»		4		9%

Genomsnitt: 3.09

3. Computer Science, Information Technology and Electrical Engineering

Biomedical Engineering»		21		14%
Communication Engineering»		18		12%
Computer Science: Algorithms, Languages and Logic»		31		20%
Integrated Electronic System Design»		1		0%
Interaction Design and Technologies»		23		15%
Networks and Distributed Systems»		1		0%
Secure and Dependable Computer systems»		0		0%
Software Engineering and Technology»		16		10%
Computer systems and Networks»		20		13%
Embedded Electronic system Design»		19		12%

Genomsnitt: 5.15

4. Engineering for Sustainable Development

Electric Power Engineering»		21		29%
Environmental Measurements and Assessments»		0		0%
Industrial Ecology - For a Sustainable Society»		14		19%
Sustainable Energy Systems»		37		51%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

5. Management of Innovation and Technology

Entrepreneurship and Business Design»		25		21%
International Project Management»		17		14%
Management and Economics of Innovation»		25		21%
Nordic Master in Maritime Management»		3		2%
Quality and Operations Management»		23		19%
Supply Chain Management»		23		19%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

6. Mechanical, Automation, and Industrial Design Engineering

Materials Engineering»		11		7%
Automotive Engineering»		12		8%
Industrial Design Engineering»		11		7%
Naval Architecture and ocean Engineering»		13		9%
Product Development»		19		13%
Production Engineering»		22		15%
Applied Mechanics»		25		17%
Systems, Control and Mechatronics»		31		21%

Genomsnitt: 5.34

7. Microtechnology and Nano Science

Materials chemistry and Nanotechnology»		16		44%
Microtechnology»		0		0%
Nanotechnology»		7		19%
Wireless, Photonics and space Engineering»		13		36%

Genomsnitt: 2.47

8. Physics, Space Science and Mathematics

Applied Physics»		29		30%
Complex Adaptive Systems»		26		27%
Engineering Mathematics and Computational Sciences»		21		22%
Fundamental Physics»		1		1%
Nuclear Engineering»		9		9%
Radio and Space Science»		1		1%
Physics and Astronomy»		8		8%

Genomsnitt: 2.68

Background and Introduction

9. How satisfied are you with the Masters programme so far?

Not at all»		11		1%
Not so satisfied»		36		4%
Neither/Nor»		67		8%
Satisfied»		383		47%
Very satisfied»		311		38%
No opinion»		3		0%

Genomsnitt: 4.17

10. What year did you start the programme?

2010»		19		2%
2011»		30		3%
2012»		326		40%
2013»		438		53%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

11. Are you

Female»		265		32%
Male»		544		67%

Genomsnitt: 1.67

12. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?

Sweden - Chalmers»		514		63%
Sweden - another university»		41		5%
University outside Sweden»		243		29%
Other»		14		1%

Genomsnitt: 1.7

13. Which Bachelor Program did you finish within (before entering the MP)

721 svarande

Affärsutveckling och entreprenörskap»		2		0%
Arkitektur»		32		7%
Arkitektur och teknik»		16		3%
Automation och mekatronik»		29		6%
Bioteknik»		24		5%
Byggingenjör»		18		4%
Dataingenjör»		9		2%
Datateknik»		36		8%
Designingenjör»		8		1%
Ekonomi och produktionsteknik»		6		1%
Elektroingenjör»		12		2%
Elektroteknik»		34		7%
Industriell Ekonomi»		40		9%
Informationsteknik»		27		6%
Kemiingenjör»		9		2%
Kemiteknik»		21		4%
Kemiteknik med fysik»		17		3%
Maskiningenjör»		21		4%
Maskinteknik»		70		15%
Mekatronikingenjör»		8		1%
Other»		282

Genomsnitt: 11.4

- Bachelor of Engineering in Metallurgy» (?)
- Bachelor of Science (Civil Engineering)» (?)
- B.E AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING» (?)
- Micro and medical engineering» (?)
- Shouldn"t it be possible to add all of the programs into one question?!?!?!?!?!» (?)
- Bachelor of Environmental Engineering» (?)
- Bachelor of Architecture» (?)
- Bachelor of Science» (Affärsutveckling och entreprenörskap)
- HING» (Arkitektur)
- CIVING/ARK» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- CIVING» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- HING» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- CIVING» (Arkitektur och teknik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Automation och mekatronik)
- BSC» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Automation och mekatronik)
- Civing» (Automation och mekatronik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- Civing» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING) » (Bioteknik)
- Civing» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- Bachelor of engineering» (Bioteknik)
- HING» (Bioteknik)
- Civing» (Bioteknik)
- CIVING» (Bioteknik)
- HING» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Byggingenjör)
- HING/CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science in Engineering» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science(CIVING)» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Byggingenjör)
- HINC» (Byggingenjör)
- CIVING» (Dataingenjör)
- Hing» (Dataingenjör)
- CIVING» (Dataingenjör)
- HING» (Dataingenjör)
- HING» (Dataingenjör)
- HING» (Dataingenjör)
- HING» (Dataingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Dataingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- Civing» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Datateknik)
- CIVING» (Designingenjör)
- HING» (Designingenjör)
- hing» (Designingenjör)
- HING» (Ekonomi och produktionsteknik)
- Hing» (Ekonomi och produktionsteknik)
- HING» (Ekonomi och produktionsteknik)
- HING» (Ekonomi och produktionsteknik)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- CIVNG» (Elektroingenjör)
- HING» (Elektroingenjör)
- Bachelor of engineering» (Elektroingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Elektroingenjör)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- HING» (Elektroteknik)
- HING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING Electric Power Engineering» (Elektroteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- HING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Elektroteknik)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- HING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- HING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing » (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- Civing» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- B.Sc. Industrial Engineering» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- HING» (Industriell Ekonomi)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering ( Information Technology)» (Informationsteknik)
- CIVING» (Informationsteknik)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Kemiingenjör)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- HING» (Kemiingenjör)
- Ihave already Msc of material chemistry.» (Kemiingenjör)
- Bachelor of Science» (Kemiteknik)
- HING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Civing» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Kemiteknik)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» (Kemiteknik)
- Civing» (Kemiteknik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- Civ ing» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- Civ.ing. » ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- CIVING» ( Kemiteknik med fysik)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of Technology» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- CIVING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Maskiningenjör)
- HING» (Maskiningenjör)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- bachelor of science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Technology» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Technology» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- HING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of science » (Maskinteknik)
- HING» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- HING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- HING» (Maskinteknik)
- bachelor of engineering» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor iof Science» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Civing» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVIN» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- CIVING» (Maskinteknik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- HING» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- HING» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- HING» (Mekatronikingenjör)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- Teknisk Fysik (CIVING)» (Other)
- Chemistry» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science Production Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Teknisk Matematik» (Other)
- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Mechanical Engineering (Germany)» (Other)
- CIVING Marine Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering - Management» (Other)
- Computer Science and Engineering, and Mathematics» (Other)
- Computer Science» (Other)
- BSc» (Other)
- CIVING - Electrical engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (Electronics and Communication Engineering) » (Other)
- Bachelor of Telecommunications Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering» (Other)
- B.Sc. Civil and Environmental Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science, Physics» (Other)
- B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering Sciences» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING, Teknisk matematik» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Ptychion) in Physics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering chemical engineering» (Other)
- Diploma of production engineering and management» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Väg och vatten. CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Computer science» (Other)
- CIVING Teknisk Design Teknisk Design at Chalmers was not listed as an option! Teknisk Design vid Chalmers fanns ej som alternativ! Den här frågan kommer att ge slumpade svar från de som gått kandidatprogrammet Teknisk Design.» (Other)
- Teknisk Design (CIVING)» (Other)
- Teknisk design, Chalmers, Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Mechatronics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Environmental Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (Civil)» (Other)
- Bsc Telecommunication Eng.» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Electrical Engineering » (Other)
- Bachelor of Electronic Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Architecture» (Other)
- Mechanical Engineering B.Sc.» (Other)
- Environmental engineering» (Other)
- Teknisk fysik! » (Other)
- Mechanical engineering, bachelor of science» (Other)
- Electronic Bachelor (HING) Industrial Management MP (HING) » (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- Computer Science Diplom in Germany» (Other)
- Energy and Environmental Engineering» (Other)
- M.Eng, Materials Science Engineer» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Industrial and Systems Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Civing» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Built Environment» (Other)
- Civil Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Industrial endineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Matematik CIVING» (Other)
- bachelor of engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Teknisk design» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering(HING)» (Other)
- Civing» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Architecture engineering » (Other)
- CIVING, Applied Chemistry» (Other)
- In fact, I already have a Master of Science from my country, in Environmental Engineering.» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology in Electrical and Electronics Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of applied physics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Architecture (Hons)» (Other)
- Bsc in Physics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Facility Management» (Other)
- Master of Science (MSc)» (Other)
- Teknisk Fysik KTH - CIVING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Electronics and Communication Engineering» (Other)
- BSC» (Other)
- Bachelor of Architecture» (Other)
- Bachelor of technology in computer science & engineering» (Other)
- Väg och vattenbyggnad» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING) » (Other)
- Teknisk fysik(Civilingenjör)(CIVING)» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- CIVING » (Other)
- Bachelor of science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Electronics & Communication (HING)» (Other)
- Chemical engineer from Chalmers 1980» (Other)
- Bachelor Of Technology in Metallurgical and material engineering , India» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering & Industrial Design» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Biochemistry» (Other)
- HING-Mechnaical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor in Computer Science and Engineering (Bachelor of Engineering), and Bachelor in Mathematics (pure mathematics, not technical mathematics, so that one was a Bachelor of Science)» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering» (Other)
- Kandidat från Civiningenjör Energiteknik, Umeå» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of engineering in Civil engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- CIVING Teknisk Fysik» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Civil mechanical engineering. Minor in energy. CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of technology (Aerospace)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING) » (Other)
- HING» (Other)

14. Which Bachelor Program did you finish within (before entering the MP)

446 svarande

Sjöfart och logistik»		2		1%
Sjöingenjör»		2		1%
Sjökapten»		0		0%
Teknisk design»		11		7%
Teknisk fysik»		63		41%
Teknisk matematik»		17		11%
Väg- och vattenbyggnad»		56		37%
Other»		295

Genomsnitt: 5.68

- Bachelors of Engineering » (?)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (?)
- B.E AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING» (?)
- Bsc Telecommunication Eng.» (?)
- BA (hons) Architecture» (?)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (?)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk design)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Teknisk design)
- Bachelor of science» (Teknisk design)
- Civing» (Teknisk design)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Teknisk Fysik (CIVING)» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Teknisk Fysik KTH - CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Teknisk fysik)
- civing» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk fysik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- Civing» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- CIVING» (Teknisk matematik)
- Civing» (Teknisk matematik)
- Bachelor of Science» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Civing» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- Don´,t know» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- civing» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- CIVING» (Väg- och vattenbyggnad)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Computer Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering and Management» (Other)
- Civil Engineering» (Other)
- Telecommunication engineering» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Technology» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science Production Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- CIVING Marine Engineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering - Management» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Computer Science and Engineering, and Mathematics» (Other)
- hing» (Other)
- Computer Science» (Other)
- CIVING - Electrical engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (Electronics and Communication Engineering)» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HINGH» (Other)
- B.Sc. Civil and Environmental Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science, Physics» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (Ptychion) in Physics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING)» (Other)
- Mechanical engineering bsc» (Other)
- Computer science» (Other)
- Mechanical» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Environmental Engineering» (Other)
- Electronic Bachelor (HING) Industrial Management MP (HING) » (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- M.Eng , Materials Science Engineer» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Engineering Physics» (Other)
- Industrial and Systems Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science (CIVING) Process and Energy Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- civil Engineer» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Industrial endineering» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Architecture engineering » (Other)
- In fact, I already have a Master of Science from my country, in Environmental Engineering.» (Other)
- Bachelor of Architecture (Hons)» (Other)
- Bsc in Physics» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Master of Science (MSc)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science» (Other)
- Bachelor of Science(CIVING)» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering » (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- BSC» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- CIVING» (Other)
- Bachelor of science» (Other)
- Chemical engineer from Chalmers 1980» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering & Industrial Design» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Civ.ing. » (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- Bioteknik,HING » (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering» (Other)
- Bsc of chemistry» (Other)
- HING» (Other)
- Civil mechanical engineering. Minor in energy. CIVING» (Other)
- Pure mathematics» (Other)
- Bachelor of Engineering (HING)» (Other)

15. What were the benefits of this bachelor program (most useful courses)

- Ekonomisk Analys 1,2,3 Inledande Ekonomi Verksamhetsutveckoing Produktionsledning»
- Image Analysis, Diagnostic Imaging, Applied Signal Processing»
- Finite element method course, all math courses, mechanics and strength of material courses»
- Företagsekonomi, Industriell Produktion och Organisation, Integrerad konstruktion och tillverkning, Produktuveckling»
- All courses involving cell biology and biochemistry.»
- Digital Communications, Wireless Communications, Wireless link project, Applied Signal Processing»
- Hard to tell most useful. I feel that all of them were important to give sufficient experiance in both math and programming.»
- Linear Systems, Electrical Fields, Fourier analysis»
- I was able to take some of the master-level courses which was good. But.. Algorithms, the math courses etc. Could have been tougher courses on bachelor.»
- Datakommunikation, Kandidatarbetet»
- The solid foundation based on computer architecture, the varied and theoretical approach to all courses in programming languages»
- Math»
- The whole concept prepared me for the master program in a good way.»
- Advanced topics in ESD, Computer Architecture, Integrated circuit design, Mixed signals and systems, Methods of ESD, ESD project»
- Risk assessment and decision support, Environmental analysis.»
- Some teachers were very helpful and give better feedback. Much more personal atmosphere than in the bachelir"s level.»
- the two cell courses.»
- More or less all of them. Especially for me is: experimentell fysik 1 & 2, optik, fourieranalys, fasta tillståndets fysik, LANA (framför allt MATLAB delen)»
- Real time systems and Embedded system design project.»
- Quite broad, showed on many different areas to study further. For my MP the most important courses where Industriell verksamhetsutveckling and Produktionsledning.»
- Heavy theory, resulted in a very critical thinking, which is good. »
- Mobile Computing and Algorithm are very useful.»
- TMV036, KKR090, KBT120, UCM010, »
- Product development project, Product development management»
- Hydrogeologi, geoteknik, teknisk geologi»
- Matematisk modellering och problemlösning»
- Hydrologi och hydrogeologi, Geoteknik, Teknisk geologi»
- Design and construction of graphical interfaces, all project courses.»
- Bachelor"s project, Structural mechanics, linear algebra»
- hållfasthet, statik, matematik»
- Good»
- The first semester and the project in spring year 1»
- Geologi, hydrogeologi, »
- Very useful: Concurrent Programming (TDA382). I had already decided I wanted to apply for Computer Systems and Networks when I took the course though.»
- Good knowledge in mechanics have been very useful.»
- Drinking water engineering, wastewater engineering, environmental engineering, geotechnics, road engineering.»
- studying the basics in mechanical engineering and thermodynamics as well as electric engineering with also some smaller courses in economics or environmental science -> to be able to focus through courses chosen at chalmers on quite the sector i want to work on»
- Datastrukturer och Algoritmer Finite Automata»
- Making use of courses as: Biochemistry Thermodynamics Separation technology Technical communication Analytical chemistry»
- IKOT useful and necesary»
- Management, Purchasing, »
- Datastrukturer och Parallel programming»
- I think most of the courses was good but some was less usefull for me now like the course in kvantmekanik we had. Most useful courses for entering the Sustainable Energy Systems MP would be the chemical engineering courses such as Grundläggande Kemiteknik.»
- Kretselektronik, Digitalteknik Syntes, Digital Konstruktion, Datorsystemteknik, Flervariabelanalys, Analys, Linjär Algebra, Diskret Matematik»
- TEK040 Introduktionskurs: Industriell ekonomi och organisation TDA143 Programmerade system TMS136 Dataanalys och statistik IAR087 Industriell Verksamhetsutveckling ITR233 Logistik TEKX04 Kandidatarbete»
- Mathematics (all of the courses from one to multivariate calculus aswell ass fourier analysis), good, useful and almost necessary. »
- All math, experimentell fysik, strömningsmekanik»
- ekonomisk analys 1-3, marknadsföring, verksamhetsutveckling, introkursen i ekonomi, kandidatearbetet»
- Programmeringsteknik - useful Statistisk fysik - good»
- Människa- maskinsystem, industriautomation, arbetsorgansation»
- This does not concern Sweden since my B.Sc. is from abroad, but my thesis work in industry was actually the most important part of my studies to figure out what I want to do.»
- Lots of maths & problem solving»
- The courses in solid and fluid mechanics.»
- miljökursen, teknisk geologi, byggande i samhället, »
- Some of the related courses connected to my Master Programme were: Construction Management 1 and 2. These courses provided an introduction which facilitated an easier understanding of the master courses at Chalmers. I would rate them as: good»
- Elektromagnetiska fält, Elteknik, Reglerteknik»
- Material science! »
- Useful courses to prepare for MP (but not necessarily good courses: TDA555 Introduktion till funktionell programmering EDA343 Datakommunikation EDA451 Digital- och datorteknik DAT042 Objektorienterad programmering»
- communication principles, advanced mathmatics, digital signal processing»
- Verksamhetsutveckling, produktionsledning, materialteknik, tillverkningsteknik, gillade maskinbasen över lag. »
- Mature, well planned.»
- Fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, programming (java), mathematics»
- Applied to the industry»
- Concurrent programming, digital- och datorteknik, »
- Distributed systems I Computer security Network security »
- All of them.»
- Real analysis, Fourier analysis, Optimization»
- Hållfasthetslära, mekanik, strukturmekanik och Samtliga matematikkurser.»
- very useful-Arbetsorganisation»
- Energiomvandling, Energi och Miljöteknik»
- Very useful, Industriell ekonomi 3 good, konstruktion, hållfastashetslära necesarry, no specific courses»
- Basic control, algorithms, data structures, physics, electrical engineering, low level programming, all the math courses»
- The combination of engineering and economic skills»
- Stad 2, Arbetets rum»
- Most beneficial from TKELT {Högfrekvensteknik EEM021, Elektromagnetiska Fält EEM015}, Also very beneficial from TKELT {Mikroelektronik MCC086, Linjära system och transformer TMA982, Mätteknik EOE054, Fysik 2 FFY143, Elektronik ETI146, Reglerteknik ESS017, All math courses, MATLAB (not a course but part of several courses)}, A very beneficial course from TKTFY is Optik FFY091»
- Math»
- Cell-courses, molecular biotechnology, biomolecular methods»
- Programming (C,Java,Matlab) - necessary/very useful Math - necessary/very useful electronics - good»
- Konstruktion, mekanik, hållfasthetsläran, matematisk överbryggning»
- The top course so far has been Product Development Management.»
- Linjär algebra, en- och flervariabelanalys, konstruktion, mekanik, hålfasthetslära, termodynamik och strömningslära, matematisk överbryggningskurs, programmeringsteknik, matematisk statistik.»
- Teknisk Fysik is fundamental and thorough in teaching physics. Virually all courses are essential and give you a firm footing to build on.»
- Datastrukturer, (good) statistisk databehandling,(good) M3 (good) »
- Math courses, Mechanics, Solid Mechanics, Statistics, Geotechnics, Hydraulic Engineering, Structural Engineering, Konstruktionsteknik, Bärande Konstruktioner, Building Physics»
- Introduction to Nuclear Reactors, Physics of Nuclear Reactors, Nuclear Reactor Safety»
- Maskinkonstruktion and IKOT»
- Mekanik 1 & 2, Elektromagnetisk fältteori, Vektorfält och klassisk fysik, Kvantfysik, Matematisk fysik»
- All the programming courses(both high and low level) was good in a sence that I got a general fealing of designig. To have knowledge of drawbacks and advantages of design choises have been useful.»
- Good»
- Mathematics, Digital teknik, »
- Algorithms, Datastrukturer, Discrete math»
- Very useful: Economics of innovation, management of development projects, research design and methods, technological change and industrial transformation, R&D strategy and organization»
- TMA970, TMA660, TMA976, MVE035, MVE295, MVE030, FTF131, FUF040»
- necessary: linjär algebra, reglerteknik. very useful: sensorer, signaler och system. good: hållfasthetslära, mekanik, elektriska kretsar, programmeringskurser»
- Fasta Tillståndets Fysik, Statistisk fysik, Matlab»
- Mathematics, mechanics, automation and control, economy, leadership, management»
- Economics of Innovation (Ekonomisk Analys 3 - Innovationsekonomi), Bachelor Thesis. Most of the Economics/Management classes.»
- It provides the fun of nature science. and I learned basic skills and made many friends»
- very useful»
- Mathematical logic, topology, algebra, parallel programming.»
- Mathematics, Mechanics, FEM, heat transfer.»
- teoriarbetet i 3:an för min del men alla kurserna tror jag är mer eller mindre lika viktiga då man lär sig att se ur ett vidt perspektiv»
- Kvantfysik, fasta tillståndets fysik»
- Behov och Krav Usability Design och användaranpassning Kandidatarbetet med produktutveckling på ett startup»
- Math, programingcourses»
- KOO081 Kemi MVE295 Komplex analys FFM332 Mekanik KAA060 Transportprocesser»
- All the mechanics courses and FEM»
- UCM010, TMV036, KOO041, KFK162, TMS145, KMG050, KBT120, KMB056, KKR090, LMT967. Courses that in different ways have been extra useful or guiding to a career in biotechnology»
- Basic understanding of several different areas within engineering»
- Många bra kurser bland annat teknisk geologi och teknisk samhällsplanering. Byggnadsekonomi bra för att veta mer om just DCPM. Bärande konstruktioner en riktigt bra kurs.»
- En bra blandning av kurser som gav en bra grund för att kunna välja masterprogram. Upplägget på kandidatprogrammet gör att man får inblick i olika områden och får en ide om vilket masterprogram och vilka masterkurser man vill välja»
- All math-courses.»
- Mechanics, Circuit theory and control theory»
- All the math courses are really good.»
- Critical thinking, project management»
- It is now four years since I completed my bachelor program. However, because of my succeeding education, the courses focusing on structural engineering were most important to me, such as hållfasthetslära, strukturmekanik, bärande konstruktioner, and konstruktionsteknik.»
- Digitalteknik-syntes, Parallell programmering, Reglerteknik»
- All programming courses»
- The courses that teach useful tools, methods and methodology are very good, such as the following. Environmental risk assessment in engineering. Life cycle assessment. Environmental impact assessment. Environmental systems analysis. »
- Good foundation as the courses are similar. All course that included case-studies are good!»
- Much control theory»
- * Programming Paradigms»
- Geologi, Geoteknik, Matematiken»
- Mathematics»
- Learning so much over the first 8 courses I"ve done!Think they all add great value for my future.»
- Programming»
- The basic mathematics and statistics courses were very useful, as were discrete mathematics. Everything hardware related is very useful and relevant, even though I don"t study hardware and I"m not plannnign to work with it, I think these courses were essential to understand both the logic and boolean parts of computing, as well as giving a genereal understanding of how computers and many other systems work, which makes me a better engineer. Among the remaining courses, I feel most relevant were courses in concurrent programming, algorithms, and mathematical modelling. »
- Model predictive control, Linear control system design, Modeling and simulation»
- Alot...»
- Material courses, math, mechanics.. everything pretty much since I appreciate width of my education»
- Digital- och datateknik, maskinorienterad programmering, objektorienterad programmering»
- Datastrukturer oc hAlgoritmer»
- useful»
- Most useful cource: Byggnadsstyrning/ekonomi »
- Logistik»
- Development of a strong toolkit (calculation, analyzation, visualisaton, communication) that is very useful for any path choosen in the future. Especially usefull for my branch is that I learned to understand connections between and applications for working with architecture and engineering as a new field.»
- Introductory mathematics - good One variable - good Linear algebra - good More variables - useful for MP Introduction to Sound and Vibration - useful for MP Theory of matter and waves - useful for MP mechanics - good road and traffic planning - useful for MP Building materials - good »
- Good study climate. Courses span over a broad area. Courses suitable for my MP are Electrical signals and systems with electricity, Experimental design and of course every type of math. Cell biology courses are good for understanding as well.»
- FEM grundkurs, Mekanik och hållfasthets kurserna (1-3), strömningslära »
- All courses during the bachelor has been useful or was useful when selecting the masters progrm»
- Strömningsmekanik, FEM Grundkurs, Mekanik,Hållfasthet och Dynamik.»
- All the electric and programming courses were useful.»
- chemistry and physics»
- cell biology, math, biotechnology»
- Material sciences - construction materials Bachelor Thesis - on sust. urban development Calculus (4 courses) - very useful in general, but not for my choise of MP»
- Marine structural engineering MMA167 Reliability analysis of marine structures SJO750»
- transport processer, matematisk modelering i kemitekninken,»
- FFM232 Vektorfält och klassisk fysik MVE035 Flervariabelanalys »
- Structural Analysis, Bridges, Design of Roads, Ways and Airports,Economics and Management of Construction Companies, Metallic and mixed structures, Railroads, Hydraulics and Hydrology, Projects organizations and Management, Ports and Coasts, Sanitary Engineering. »
- Food Technology, Food chemistry, advanced analytical chemistry.»
- FLUID COURSES,PROPULSION,AIRCRAFT COMPOSITE STRUCTURES,SOLID COURSES»
- Probably the most useful courses were those in electromagnetic field theory and radiofrequency engineering, but the various courses in math were essential as well.»
- In MY opinion useful courses (for making my MP as good as possible and useful in my branch): Geoteknics, geology, hållfasthetslära, byggnadsmaterial, matematisk statistik»
- Thermodynamics Fundamental of Heat Transfer Chemical Engineering Equipment Operation and Design Chemical Engineering Plant Design»
- In a way all my courses in the bachelor program were important because they gave a good groud understanding of physics. »
- Logistics»
- I think the way of working in general, doing case studies etc. But if certain courses are to be lifted up I guess Ekonomisk analys 3: Innovationsekonomi is the main one, although it differs quite a lot from what we did at the master program. The very first introduction course in Industriell ekonomi also contained quite a few elements being elaborated further on during the master program.»
- Good mix of engineering areas.»
- I would say M³ (Miljö & Matematisk Modellering) was an extremely good way to finish the bachelor programme. The courses in basic calculus and linear algebra were obviously necessary. »
- Useful: EDA321 EDA331 EEM076 SSY080»
- Byggande i samhället Teknisk geologi Kandidatarbetet »
- I think most courses in my bachelor have been very good. »
- The energy courses, like thermodynamic and energiteknik»
- Reglerteknik, Matlabmoment, Allmän bredd»
- Most corses in mpsys are simular to the control corses in my bachlor »
- good»
- High Performance Computing Numerical Linear Algebra Computational Physics»
- Reglerteknik, Signaler sensorer och system, alla Matematikkurser»
- Knowledge of the construction industry and the concept of building design before just number-crunching.»
- Matte, hållf, bärande konstruktion, konstruktionsteknik, strukturmekanik, (MATLAB)»
- All structural courses were necessary and very useful. Most useful was the strukturemkanik.»
- Courses around VHDL, Computer architecture, Programming, Electronics and electronic Physics are must-have.»
- Datastrukturer, AI»
- Introduction to Sound and Vibration Thesis »
- Everything except Control Theory»
- Hydrologi och hydrogeologi, geoteknik, hydraulik med va-teknik, teknisk samhällsplanering, teknisk geologi»
- Electromagnetic field theory, High frequency technology and industrial economy»
- ---»
- Distributed systems, security»
- no»
- Statistik, inledande geologi»
- FEM, Transformer och Diff.ekv (valbara), reglerteknik. Alla mattekurser»
- Concrete structure steel structure structural analysis »
- Supply Chain Management, Innovation Economics, Mathematics, Mechanics, Physics »
- Försöksplanering, reglerteknik, linjära system och transformer, statistik.»
- Material-kemi»
- advanced computer graphic, computer graphic etc.»
- Necessary courses: Flervariabelanalys, Materie- och vågteori, strukturmekanik. Usefull corses: Bärande konstruktioner, konstruktionsteknik, CAD, industribyggnad, brobyggnad.»
- Thermal engg, thermodynamics,basic electrical engg, Heat transfer, power plant engg, fluid mechanics.»
- Usability, Ergonomics, Behov och Krav»
- Courses in economy, law, management, shipping and logistics have been very useful in my career but also in my MP and everyday life»
- Signal processing - very useful. Math - good. Programming (not a course, but general usage) - good.»
- Chalmers formula student - very useful»
- Good level of the education in a wide field of knowledge areas»
- Plenty of mathematics that I have had use of. Also basic programming and lots of MATLAB experience.»
- Strategy and the Creation of Change, Accounting, Control, organisation, international Marketing and purchasing. »
- Project management Design for experience Industrial design engineering project Masters thesis Visual brand identity»
- Usability, Design och användaranpassning, kandidatarbete, Behov och krav, ergonomi»
- Prototyping in Interaction Design, Interaction Design methodology, Gameplay Design are all useful, fun and good courses.»
- very useful - arbetes rum, byggnad som system »
- All courses in math, electromagnetic field theory, circuit theory, experimental physics. »
- I were able to take several courses during my bachelor that are mandatory in my MP which made it possible for me to choose more freely»
- Atmospheric chemistry,environmental impact assessment,Technology of non-conventional sources of energy,etc»
- All math courses, especially linear algebra and numerical analysis, programming, PDE course were useful. »
- All mathematics courses»
- Experimentell fysik, Kvanfysik, Tillämpad kvantfysik, Fasta tillståndets fysik, Elfält»
- the most useful courses were strategic management, project management,international projects,construcion processes and construction governance. in my career i manage projects from commencement to completion. these courses enhanced my skills on handling different aspects in these projects like multi cultural teams, rules and regulations in society, etc»
- Engineering Maths Signals and Systems Data networks Wireless communication»
- Basic electronics/circuit theory. RF/Microwave engineering, Electrostatics, Electromagnetic Waves, Photonics, Solid state electronics, communication engineering, wireless engineering & antenna design. Bachelor thesis focused on area very similar to MP material»
- Fluid mechanics - Very useful Solid mechanics - Very useful»
- Maths»
- basic science knowledge»
- All courses in mathematics, VERY GOOD AND USEFUL (I"d say necessary)(single and multivariable analysis, complex analysis, fourier analysis, statistical mathematics, numerical analysis, Vector algebra). Physics VERY GOOD and USEFUL (for what I read necesary): mechanical physics 1 and 2, quantum physics and applied qunatum physics. Electromagnetic field therory. Mathematical physics. Vector fields. Solid state physics. Eperimental physics A, B, C and 2. Computer introduction. Statistical physics and thermodynamics TOTALLY USELESS AND UNNECESSARY: Optics, Enviromental physics, MTS»
- Programing, Vibrations, Mechanics.»
- Thermodynamics, heat and mass transfer, courses related to systems»
- mek & hållf, maskinelement, mekatronik, kandidatarbetet»
- Algorithms, programming courses, math courses»
- Programming Cirquit theory Mechanics »
- The ones combining architectural and engineering knowledge. »
- All, expected research methodology.»
- Math and Progrogramming, problem solving and abstraction and and kickass mindset»
- Reglerteknik - very useful Alla mattekurser - very useful»
- Flervariabelanalys (necessary) Linjär algebra och numerisk analys (necessary) Programmeringsteknik (necessary) Fasta tillståndets fysik (good)»
- The hydraulics and the first geology course. Knowing math and matlab was also good»
- Experimentell fysik Matematisk fysik Komplex analys Fourieranalys»
- Good that we tried project in different scales and did projects alone and in groups. Would be great if we would have learned how to work in a sustainable way, I still have no clue how much I"ll manage to do in a (for other people) normal 40h-week. I would also lika more focus on sustainability on a deeper level. Very useful to have a "free spirit", but when something really is unrealistic or even impossible this should not be left unnoticed.»
- Matematisk fysik, speciell relativitetsteori, mitt kandidatarbete på subatomär fysik för Christian Forssén, fourieranalys»
- Advanced, High Pace, Prepared for most MP I would say, in relevant areas.»
- Teknisk samhällsplanering»
- The courses in experimental courses was very helping in learning problemsolving. The braod curriculum also gave a very good general knowledge.»
- Economic Calculation, Heat transfer, Thermodynamics »
- Ship stability, Hydrodynamics,Structural»
- Geologi, geoteknik med grundläggning, hållfasthetslära, mattekurserna, hydraulik med VA-teknik,»
- Very useful»
- Sustainable energy Futures Stakeholder Management for Sustainability Urban Metabolism Ecology for Engineers»
- Understanding of circuitry. Signal processing»
- A wide selection of courses within most fields in chemistry. It made it easier to find the field of interest when choosing a master"s program. »
- Digitaletknik syntes has been most useful»
- Gameplay Design, Computer Graphics, HCI»
- Most courses were useful. »
- Real Estate Finance, very useful»
- Different math corses and signal and systems corse.»
- Grundläggande kurser inom ekonomi (Micro,makro), produktionsledning, kandidatarbetet »
- Thermodynamics. Linear algebra. »
- My bachelor thesis subject. Ind. marknadsföring Ind. verksamhetsutveckling Produktionsleding »
- chemistry, electromagnetic, applied physic»
- Electric Drives Power Electronics»
- Introductional thermodynamics, transport processes, energiteknik (heter den så..?)»
- Very useful: Object oriented programming 1 and 2 Necessary: Object oriented programming 1 and 2, discrete math, linear algebra Good: Datastructures, Databases»
- Economics, management, B.Sc. thesis, Maths»
- circuit theory»
- Environmental management. Managing Organizations and Project Management.»
- The security specialization »
- Almost all courses were good»
- All courses have been great help. »
- What?»
- Holistic perspective. Competent and invested academic staff. Close communication between students and staff. »
- For me and my choice of specialization, all courses which incloude signal/image processing/analysis especially. But also all math courses.»
- The benefits are that it is quite broad, and we get to learn many different areas. Such as industrial production and organisation alsongside with mechatronics and material sience. »
- Haskell programming, Data structures, Algorithms, Math»
- Project Management, Leadership and Communications, International Projects, Project Psycology»
- Advanced Mathematics, Physics, Circuit Theory, Electric Machines, Electronics, Power Systems, Power Electronics, Electric Drives.»
- General problem solving and math courses and the courses within electromagnetic theory. The lab courses were also very good.»
- Chemistry, miljövetenskap, bioteknik, most courses»
- Termodynamik och Strömningslära, Miljö- och energiteknik, Energiomvandling»
- Matlab, mechanical physics and bachelor thesis course»
- Reglerteknik och sensorer, signaler och system, flervariabelanalys»
- project courses»
- Design & användaranpassning, Behov & krav, Usability, Ergonomi, Skissteknik, Matematik kurserna, »
- Operational research»
- Project Management, Strategic Communication and basic architectural history courses. »
- Lean - very good»
- No comments»
- the courses from bechelor like comunication, EM waves, radar, Antenna... were really useful to start and finish this program!»
- Very useful/necessary: kemi- och biokemi, yt- och materialkemi, organisk och oorganisk kemi, analytisk kemi, fysikalisk kemi, good: matematisk statistik, tillämpad matematik, (alla andra tekniska kurser om kemi är bra att ha med sig)»
- not applicable»
- All courses have been useful»
- Design Course»
- Människa Maskin System »
- All math courses, Mathematical Physics, Electromagnetic Theory, Linear Algebra and Numerical Analysis»
- I had courses related to general engineering including engineering mechanics, structure mechanics, machine design, electronics, programming and different kinds of dynamics.»
- Geologi, hydrogeologi, energi och resursanalys, teknisk samhällsplanering»
- Statistisk databehandling, Nonlinear optimisation, Datastrukturer»
- Elteknik, kretsanalys, all mathematic courses »
- Behov och krav Design och användaranpassning»
- Leadership and Communication »
- Learning Java, programming, algorithms and datastructures, databases, network courses. The discrete mathematics has also been proven useful in the Master programme courses.»
- Very wide range of courses including a large block of Chemical Engineering courses as well as many( however maybe not all) courses needed for entering masters programme in Physics or Mathetatics.»
- The basic knowledge in mathematics and Physics.»
- CAD Courses, mechanical engineering, user needs mapping»
- Learning more about mechanics.»
- Good teachers in mathematics and many maths courses. The course in Linear systems and transforms prepared well for Communication Engineering.»
- Logistics, integrated production organisation»
- Industriell produktion och organisation, Logistik, ingenjörsmetodik, industriell konstruktion och tillverkning»
- Wireless Communications, Signals and Systems, Computer Networks.»
- Environmental Impact Assessment, Water quality, Maths applied to Environmental Sciences»
- Very useful: Transportprocesser, grundläggande kemiteknik, Analys och linjär algebra A-C, Termodynamik Good: Kemisk reaktionsteknik, Energiteknik och miljö, Separations- och apparatteknik, Matematisk modellering Necessary: Transportprocesser, grundläggande kemiteknik, Energiteknik och miljö»
- auto cad, hydrologi, hydraulic »
- circuit analysis analog circuits electrodynamics field and wave electromagnetics »
- The "transport processer" was a very important course»
- The product development project»
- Computing, model making techniques»
- Courses within business development and leadership»
- I had to take an additional course in mathematics to be able to get in to my MP. »
- Background in Physics in general»
- The bachelor was not very connected to my MP but of course the math and physiscs was helpful. It was also interesting to have the management and business background when coming to MPSES. It made me look at things from Another perspective than my collegues»
- Termodynamik, Fasta tillståndets fysik, Kvantfysik»
- For me the most usefull courses were modeling and simulation and applied signal procesing»
- Almost all of them, but especially: Solid State Physics Thermodynamics Experimental Physics»
- Not so much, but only structural engineering courses»
- Thermodynamics MTF041, Energy conversion ENM025, Miljö och energiteknik ENM110, Mathematics (TMV166,TMV151, MVE255,TMS062, TMV225) , Matlab TME135, The yearly Project courses(MMF172,TME040,ENMX02), Strömmningsmekanik (MTF052), Industriell ekonomi IEK102, Industriell produktion och organisation (TEK060).»
- Drinking water engineering, Wastewater engineering, geotechnics»
- Bioseparationsteknik, transportprocesser, bioreaktionsteknik»
- the energy conversion and heat transfer and the thermo dynamics»
- Objektorienterad programvaruutveckling, fortsättningskurs (TDA550) Objektorienterat programmeringsprojekt (TDA367) Datastrukturer och Algoritmer (TDA416) Matematisk Modellering (DAT026) Kandidatarbete (DATX02) »
- Grundläggande software engineering, Objektorienterad programmering (Java) objektorienterade applikationer (Java), ekonomi och organisation, bachelor thesis»
- Arbetets Rum, Text och Teori, Bostadens rum.»
- Hydrology, Geotechnics, Environmental Engineering, Maths»
- Mekanik, bärande konstruktioner, konstruktionsteknik, byggnadsmaterial, geoteknik, matlab (CAD och programmeringsteknik). »
- matlab (grundläggande programmeringsförståelse) Industriell Produktion och Organisation Virtuell Produktion IKOT Kandidatarbete»
- Web development, HCI, Graphics, Programming in Java»
- CIU205, MVE375, MVE365, CIU225, CIU215 where all very good.»
- Very useful»
- Object Oriented Programming, Calculus, Algebra, Statistics, Bachelor"s Thesis»
- Construction project management»
- Requirements Engineering, Agile Software Methodologies, Empirical Software Engineering»
- It did sound interesting.»
- Very useful: Strukturmekanik Good: byggnadsfysik, hållfasthetslära»
- Dig o Dat, Object oriented programming, Digital construction course, and another about VHDL»
- Black belt and quality courses»
- Microwave Engineering, Fundamentals of Photonics, Active Microwave Circuits»
- Good»
- Optimerade strukturer Kandidatarbete Hållfasthestslära»
- Industriell produktion och organisation logistik»
- , industrial energy systems, design of industrial energy equiment,CFD, multiphase flow, preliminary plant design, advanced chemical reaction engineering»
- n.a.»
- Electric power engineering related courses which has helped me alot to prepare for my master studies»
- Learned a lot about, matlab, group work and mechanics. »
- Signals and Systems, Wireless Communications, Digital Signal Processing»
- Matematisk statistik, Datastrukturer, Reglerteknik»
- Transportprocesser, matematisk modellering, separations & apparatteknik, kemisk rekationsteknik, energiteknik och miljö, grundläggande kemiteknik, termodynamik»
- Strength of Materials, Process Regulation/Control, Maritime Law, Mechanics, Fartygs System, Electrical System»
- Introductory course in electric power engineering - very useful. Control theory - very useful. Transforms - very useful.»
- Termodynamik, Transportprocesser, Energiteknik och Miljö, Analys och linjär algebra A-C»
- LSoT Multivariable calculus Linear algebra Statistics and signal processing Control engineering»
- Security track»
- Linear algebra, multi variable analysis, FEM, strenght of materials.»
- Math, structural engineering courses»
- The good courses are (all of them taken at Chalmers): Datorintroduktion (Necessary for the Linux-systems) Inledande matematisk analys Matematisk analys, fortsättning Flervariabelanalys Komplex matematisk analys (Very good and very important course) Fourieranalys (Very important course) Matematisk statistik Experimentell fysik 1 - mätteknik Experimentell fysik 2 - bas Mekanik 1 Mekanik 2 Elektromagnetisk fältteori (Very important, and overall a good course) Speciell relativitetsteori Kvantfysik (Extremely important for physicists) Fasta tillståndets fysik (Very relevant for most continuing studies within physics) Subatomär fysik Termodynamik och statistisk mekanik»
- behov och krav, usability, digital modelling, mechanics»
- Not one single course, it is the mix that was attractive»
- Mandatory courses in fluid and solid mechanics.»
- Transportprocesser, Bioreactionsteknik, Bioseparationsteknik.»
- Housing inventions»
- Indicates that i am a fast learner and have a wide spread knowlege in engeineering. »
- signal and system, mathmatics»
- Housing Innovation Urban Design studio»
- Strömmingslära»
- Datastrukturer, intro till funktionell programmering, objektorienterad programmering, Digdat, MOP och DST. »
- Bachelor thesis -useful Hydraulik - useful and necessary »
- Freedom if choice, allowing us to focus on topics we find interesting. »
- FEM, structural analysis»
- Geoteknik Byggmaterial Hållfasthetslära»
- most courses were useful and interesting in terms of a general education within physics»
- Analys och linjär algebra, Kemi, Kvantfysik»
- Courses with MATLAB were very useful. Other than that: Grundläggande Kemiteknik, Kemisk reaktionsteknik and Energiteknik och Miljö were courses that were good to have taken before starting MPSES.»
- Solid state physics, math, chemistry»
- Math, behov och krav»
- Connection with industry, achievable learning outcomes, good preparation for career.»
- Training in structural and strategic thinking and design tools»
- Logistics, Virtual Production, Industrial economy»
- The variation of courses to include the whole development cycle.»
- -»
- Termodynamik Fastatillståndets fysik »
- Financial and management accounting, Project Management, Project Psychology »
- Marine insurance»
- All math, physics courses. Especially experimental phhsichs»
- Good allround program, naturally good in mechanics and similiar courses»
- Technological change and industrial transformation, Idea Evaluation,Creating New Business. Especially innovation branch.»
- Very useful for my interests in Fuel Cells (modelling).»
- It is the widest program you will find.»
- Konstruktionsteknik, hållfasthetslära, strukturmekanik»
- Don"t get the question.»
- solid mechanics, physics»
- Heat and power systems and design of industrial energy systems.»
- IKOT, IPO, INDEK, Ingenjörs metodik, Statistics and other math»
- Databaser, algortimer och datastrukturer, mattekurser»
- VHDL courses»
- Good»
- Termodynamik, Transportprocesser, Grundläggande Kemiteknik, Energiteknik & Miljö»
- Digital and computersciencerelated courses»
- Linear Algerbra, very useful Multi variable analysis, Very useful Options and mathematics - Good Statistics - Very useful»
- Most of it really»
- Bioreaktionsteknik very useful Molekylär Bioteknik very useful Inledande Cell och Molekylärbiologi good Cell och Molekylärbiologi 2 good Försökplanering very useful »
- TDA545, DAT215, DAT026, IEK415, IAR075, TDA416 »
- Programming courses, some of the math courses, "matematisk modellering" was a good course»
- useful»
- Good»
- IPO»
- Logistik, Operations management, Marknadsföring var bra kurser för mitt MP-program. Också case-lösning som varit en del av många kurser har varit användbart i MP.»
- computational physics, computational materials physics, surface and nanophysics, »
- Mathematics courses, Quantum physicsand theoretical chemistry Chemistry corse All very useful.»
- The courses in statistics, linear algebra, transform theory and both calculus courses were absolutely crucial.»
- Good, much less focus on the biotech subjects in comparison with my expectations»
- All courses were relevant, the courses in physics and math were necessary for my MP»
- Wide knowledge span to lie back on. Good teachers and great classmates. Still provides a good network that I think I"ll benefit from for a long time. »
- Inledande matematik, Analys i en variabel, Matlab, Hållfasthetslära, Byggnadsmaterial, Geoteknik med grundläggning, Bärande konstruktioner, Konstruktionsteknik och Strukturmekanik. »
- Structural engineering and building physics courses. + the maths»
- Chemistry, cell and molecular biology»
- I didn"t experience that any courses was necessary for the MP. »
- x»
- All my mathematics courses were useful, since I studied pure mathematics. Such as Abstract Algebra, Probability Theory or Logic. Courses on Algorithms and Data structures were also very useful.»
- project courses»
- Bärande konstruktioner»
- Basics in logistics»
- Algorithms, Compiler construction, Language Technology, Language-based security.»
- Wastewater Engineering, Chemistry»
- I took Bioengineering in my bachelor years, which provided very useful and basic information for my master study. »
- Steel, Timber, Reinforced Concrete, Masonry Structures, Mechanics of Materials, ArchiCAD, Structuras and Architectural Design»
- good background in both architecture and structural engineering. most useful: bachelor thesis »
- The mix of architecture and engineering is very useful either way one chooses to go. It makes for more reflecting engineers and more structured architects. Strukturmekanik was the most important course in my desicion to apply for MPSEB.»
- Kemi och biokemi, metabolism, bioreaktionsteknik»
- Organic Chemistry, Inorganic chemistry, Analytical Chemistry 1 and 2, Physical chemistry, Thermodynamic, Reactor processes, Separation processes 1 and 2»
- Leadership and communication»
- Nice with a small class»
- Sensorer signaler och system Reglerteknik Mekanik Elektriska kretsar»
- Reglerteknik, mekatronik, transformer och differentialekvationer, och dynamik where very useful»
- Grundläggande kemiteknik - very useful Kemisk Reaktionsteknik - very useful Separations- och apparatteknik - very useful Energiteknik och miljö - good Matematisk modellering - good»
- my necessary courses for my choice of MP is nanotechnology.»
- Kretsanalys, Reglerteknik, Elektromagnetiska fält, Elektronik, Elteknik, Linjära system och transformer.»
- Structural analysis and extensive lab experiments helped me understand the concepts much better in MP. »
- matematisk statistik och signalbehandling, LSOT»
- The most important cources must be math and calculation of constructions, but important to emphasize that the other cources are valuable for understand the whole consept of building technology.»
- Miljö och Energieteknik, värmeöverföring, strömningsmekanik, termodynamik och energiomvandling»
- Math courses, matlab course and mechanics courses»
- Most courses has been somewhat useful with a few exceptions.»
- Road engineerin, water engineering and geotechnics»
- no comments»
- Analysis,numerical analysis,linear algebra»
- Objektorienterad programvaruutveckling (nexessary) Diskret matematik (useful) Databaser (useful) Matematisk modellering och problemlösning (good) Datakommunikation (necessary, useful) Ändliga automater och formella språk (useful) Web-applikationer (useful) Kommunikation engelska (useful) Kandidatarbete (useful)»
- De flesta kurserna var bra, framförallt sista året d det blev mer av projektarbete, till viss del också riktat mot företag.»
- Theory of Internal combustion engine Vehicle vibration»
- Very useful»
- Transportprocesser, Termodynamik, Energiteknik och miljö, Kemisk reaktionsteknik, Separations- och apparatteknik. (and of course the intro mathematics course, Analys och linjär algebra)»
- Very useful»
- Molekylär bioteknik, Cell och molekylärbiologi 1 och 2, Bioreaktionsteknik, Metabolism och teknisk mikrobiologi.»
- Special relativity, quantum mechanics and partial differential equations.»
- Mechanics and solid mechanics (1,2,3). Finite Element Method »

16. Indicate possible improvements for your bachelor program.

- The order of the courses needs to be rearranged. RIght now you take image analysis after image processing/diagnostic imaging and this just makes it harder and more confusing.»
- It has already been changed to the better since when I started it (2009). They have added more CAD for example, which I missed during my time.»
- Reglertekniken kursen kan behöva ses om.»
- Perhaps more cell biology and to divide it into several courses instead of mixing everything into one.»
- No rush on the lectures, focus on understanding. More connection with nowadays technologies.»
- The courses should be harder to pass to make sure enough experiance is achieved before entering the MP.»
- More statistics/probability courses»
- Oh. "Bärkraftig resursanvändning" - Didn"t make me better at anything related to Datateknik. Useless. "Datakommunikation" - I see why we had a course in networks but the level was so basic and that made it a waste of 7hp. »
- Reglerteknik does not fit in the program. I"m pretty sure I won"t have any use of the course and it is pretty hard to pass if you are not interested in the subject.»
- perhaps software engineering project or some similar course should be mandatory. Mentioning javascript in the object-oriented programming course and perhaps even including a JS-lab assignment would be good»
- Could be more preparing for my certain master program even if it was already good.»
- More courses with projects.»
- To much geotechnics for my taste.»
- Some courses needed oversight in our first year, but they have been fixed for this year"s freshman.»
- More courses that focus on medical research. Less focus on the industry.»
- None»
- I and several other at the program think that the program is too much focused on low level ASIC design and VHDL, and that focus should be shifted more towards hardware oriented programming. For example courses involving an embedded operating system or networks for emb. systems.»
- If the lectures could become more useful, it would be worth of the tuition fee. My experience told me the lecture from Chalmers were useless. »
- FTF195»
- Companies that understand what they get into when they apply for the product development project»
- informationsteknik»
- Too much focus on building construction in the beginning.»
- More courses that contain programming aswell as design. »
- statestikkursen måste förbättras»
- more relevant courses in the spring»
- More of the soil and rock mechanics»
- The program needs a better connection between the PA and the students. The process for ecaluation of the program and its courses is poor.»
- It is a lot of repetition in the courses. Same things in many courses. »
- Ta bort transformer och reglerteknik»
- More hardware oriented courses. Some basic course on semiconductors»
- Financial mathematics for Industrial engineering students is not well-structured. The courses could be more geared towards corporate finance and easier on the math.»
- An introductory course in algorithm design, and more electable courses within computer science.»
- Programming with more languages, in more tasks.»
- A solid education in methods and more reflecting courses are necessary as well as a better student/teacher ratio. But again this does not concern Sweden.»
- Add another (good, not the "stochastical methods" joke course) course on statistics. It"s well needed.»
- The program needs to live up to its name, and not only focus on the theoretical stuff.»
- mer fokus på miljö genom hela programmet. Mer samverkan med andra kandidatprogram. Mer om samhällsplanering och samhällsbyggande i stort, just nu är det väldigt tekniskt och detaljerat.»
- My bachelor program did not have the same focus as the Master Programme that I am doing at Chalmers. Therefore, I consider it not relevant to make suggestions.»
- A Matlab/Simulink course and less library courses»
- More practical "construction", doing stuff in CAD and making drawings etc.»
- Course ERE102 Reglerteknik does not fit into the program. It is way too hard and consumes too much time that could be spent on other courses. It should be removed or heavily modified so that it is possible for someone with a computer science background to pass it on the first try. The course TEK130 Vetenskapshistoria which is one of the compulsory MTS-courses is not up to the academic standard that Chalmers hold. Generally, there are some courses were the lecturer does a bad job in presenting the subject, even if the curriculum of the course is good. »
- Simuleringen kändes inte så relevant samt att då den bara är godkänd eller icke godkänd lade man ner väldigt lite tid på den. En idé är också att byta plats på hållfastighetsläran som ligger i lp4 år tre och exempelvis tillverkningstekniken som ligger i lp2 år 3 då hållfastighetsläran är en tung kurs att ha samtidigt som man är i slutskedet av sin kandidatuppsats. Tillverkningstekniken är inte heller helt lätt men ändå lite mer greppbar än hållfastighetsläran. »
- Better connect computer science to non-classical computer science courses such as cotnrol theory etc. Students need to be able to relate in order to be interested. »
- More study visits/travels»
- more oral presentations»
- Operating systems: dissonance between what was taught and what was assessed on the exam. The labs unsupported and felt disconnected from the lectures. Distributed systems II: did not really provide any extra depth or content as compared to the first course. Excellent labs, but the lectures did not teach us anything new.»
- Ta bort ekonomikursen och teknisk samhällsplanering, möjligen slå ihop dem. »
- The selection of semi-mandatory courses is very strange, I have no practical option than to take 15hp worth of courses in image analysis in this programme. »
- The Matstatt course needs to be inproved drastically! I did not lear much on that course.»
- the sustainability part of the education was of low quality and could have been done much better. »
- i hear they plan to remove the course in basic control. please tell them not to!»
- Consider the overlap in various courses. make uses of the mathematical knowledge in the economies and BA courses. Build a real case based education.»
- More focus on sustainable development and system thinking.»
- There is a need of relevant MTS-courses to choose from. Kretsanalys EMI084 is too basic and could be at a more advanced/higher level. Datakommunikation EDA343 has a nice and relevant content/topic but has extremely poor administration, the lectures does not increase learning. Teknisk kommunikation FSP025 should be replaced or changed entirely since it is at the level of pre university studies (grundskolan), rather that encouraging students to act and take initiative to learn it makes them skip classes and feel like children since that is how the teachers treat them. In Teknisk kommunikation it was accepted by the teachers to not complete tasks, to be late and to not participate in class. »
- Matlab need to be improved (I started Bt08). I didn"t feel that I learned matlab until the last course on biotechnology master: Industrial biotechnology. Maybe for a biotechnology student it is more useful to know how to use existing programs instead of writing code..? Transport processes is a good but too heavy course, it need to give more hp or reduce the content. I think that "mekanik med biologiska tillämpningar" feels like an unessessary course...»
- It"s a quite well balanced program, and in addition, they have redone the whole education schedule on later years, so I would say that my opinion does not reflect the current program»
- Better organisation would be valuable!»
- everything, many courses had nothing to do with the program, especially konstruktionsmetodik, kommunikation, Miljö och energiteknik and many others»
- Introduktionskursen Konstruktionsmetodik var i princip helt onödig, jag lärde mig ingenting. Även kommunikationskursen var onödig, förutom grammatikdelen i den. Kurserna materialteknik och tillverkningsteknik kan förbättras väldigt mycket.»
- I lack a course in Hamiltonian Mechanics which would have been useful later courses in Quantum Mechanics.»
- Decreased work load. The work load is insane and much higher than in other bachelor programmes at Chalmers! Engineering physics should be reviewed to be improved!»
- Industriell ekonomi känns fortfarande inte som att jag har haft nytta av. »
- The Bachelor Thesis didn"t seem very useful. I understand that it"s necessary in order to live up to the Bologna Process standards, but it could still be executed better. Other courses, like the The environmental course would be much better if it was more influenced by social sciences (Not everything has to be technical just because it"s a technical univeristy, right?).»
- -Many of the 4,5 hp courses had a very high work load. -Information has often been lacking.»
- increase or introduce pedagogical education for most of the teachers. Lectures and course structure have unfortunately not met my expectations.»
- Spending more resources on labs (newer, or at least working, materials) in various courses would always be appreciated. I would have liked to be able to choose a more "physics"-oriented path. Perhaps add a new physics course as an electory one togerher with Hållfasthetslära and Reglerteknik åk2 lp4? I feel that there were gaps in my knowledge that were assumed to be known in the master"s programme, that could have been filled by such a course. »
- It is good with a broad knowledge, but I feel that it could have been good to have more courses that build on each other.»
- The level of difficulty in some management courses can be advantageously increased to a level more close to master program level, in particular the marketing and operations courses. (At least at the time I attended them.) For reference, Ekonomisk Analys 3 had a challenging level of difficulty.»
- Step by step learning can be made for bettter following the course. »
- N/A»
- det är bra med information och väldigt tydligt som det är idag men informationen kommer något sent kan jag tycka.»
- Intellectual property rights and strategies Understanding the creation of a business case and not only a use case Basic IT course»
- I think that Flervariablen should be a mandatory course»
- more business cases»
- The course in mathematical statistics. I really tried to learn but the material was poor, e.g. there was no examples in a major part of the literature. Therefore I did not have the skills that I needed for the MP.»
- FTF195, TMA682, EEM065, KAA060. Need to update and reevaluate their"s purpose. In some cases adapt the content in terms of time and hp. Improve the exam to bring more knowledge to the students»
- Informationskompetens kursen för att lära sig söka i bibliotekets sökmotor var totalt onödig och att man ska behöva ha två nästan identiska kurser i detta under både första och tredje året och dessutom ha en hemuppgift i detta känns väldigt korkat. Vem vet inte hur det används egentligen? Borde räckt med en halvtimmas information om hur det funkar och var man hittar verktygen i en föreläsningssal där man bifogas ett dokument om hur det fungerar. »
- Mer återkoppling efter varje kritik i kurserna/projektet. Att få chans att diskutera och reflektera över vad man gjorde bra och vad man kan jobba mer med i nästa kurs, och synliggöra vilka kunskaper man fått. Eftersom kunskapen på arkitektprogrammet kan verka så abstrakt är det viktigt att försöka konkretisera det man lärt sig. Gärna genom någon sorts seminarie i mindre med andra elever (och lärare) där man kan diskutera hela processen lite mer avslappnat än vid kritikttillfället där det är mer fokus på slutprodukten och inte resan dit.»
- Better courseadministration, less pingpong.»
- No changes»
- Needs more sustainable development thinking»
- It"s been too many years since then to come up with a good answer.»
- More project courses (has already been done). »
- I personally would like further courses in atmospheric science and water analysis to chose from, as there were in the former masters programme Environmental measurements and assessments.»
- Väg-kurserna kan behövas ses över. De är bra men de kan ha högre tempo på föreläsningar.»
- IAR059 feels very poor for the moment, not well defined and very confusing. Doesn"t fall in line with the rest of the courses.»
- Reglerteknik feels like a bit unneccessary course. Almost everybody fails it many times and it becomes a problem in general. Also, nobody really cares since what is taught feels not relevant for most of us. I think the signals and systems course is relevant because it teaches a lot of mathematics which is more generally applicable, while Reglerteknik course takes things too far. I"m sure it"s useful stuff, but it feels VERY far from what most of us will be doing with software development, algorithms and parallel programming for example. Also, many students from the TKDAT bsc think that they lack a lot of mathematics skills to properly learn the Reglerteknik course. I did too, even though I had grade 5 in the basic math courses and electric circuits (lots of applied math), and 4 in statistics and 4 in transforms and signals. Reglerteknik was just on a far higher level and different from the other things we study. It shouldn"t be mandatory. »
- Embedded control systems (more control, less peer reviewing)»
- Rather big classes limits the interaction with teachers but I guess theres not muh to do about that»
- There need to be more elective courses. »
- Remove model-driven development»
- n.a.»
- Possible improvement: Practical course (obligation) for everybody within the BSc program (15hp). »
- I am enlisted in 2006 and at that time Operations management and Verksamhetsutveckling were basically the same thing. If it hasn"t been done already, those two could have a better alignment. Programmering was completely useless to me, by far the hardest course to see the benefits of.»
- I think the different future possibilities should be stressed more, like for example - i don"t think it"s so common to choose MPDSD from AT, which is a shame. I am very satisfied, but didn"t know so much about it before. I think also the study-social environment should be strenghtened. The education takes over your life. I think it"s a matter of both the pressuare we as student"s put on ourselfe, beause we have a history of being ambitious and so on, but this is also stressed by the teachers and tutors that put"s high pressuare on AT student when it comes to results. Everybody expects us to deliver, and that means tasks and assignments can sometimes be handled out late because the teacher "know we will do it", but it gives us no time to plan our life and spare time. To solve this, I think the expectations and workload need to be declared clearer and at an early stage, so we at least have time to plan in some other activities. I think there need to be a aconsciousness from teacher"s point of view that there is important to encourage the process as well as the diversity in the group. To sometimes stress that it"s a skill to know "good enought".»
- Make the math courses better when it comes to how many that can pass it»
- In general, more Matlab training is always necessary. Furthermore having a control systems course should be mandatory.»
- I matstat kursen borde göras om lite för man lärde sig inte så mycket med det upplägget som var då»
- Flytta rigid body dynamics till bachelor programmet. skulle kunna göra till en valbar kurs. Matematisk statistik kan va en intressant kurs men upplägget av examineringen gjorde att ingen bra förståelse uppnåddes. Examineringsmetoden bör förändras även om verktygen som användes var bra. »
- The order of the courses. Statistics is too early, by time we need it it is already forgotten. Stat and transport should not be at the same time»
- More case studies, or anything to gain more practical experience and understanding for what we are calculating (courses on construction)»
- The group work sometimes is not working at all together with the international studies, who copy texts, cheat and show lack of interest. This is not all of them, some are extremely good to work with. The problem is the lack of commitment to help the Swedish students when things like this happens. The responsibility for this if 100% upon the Swedish students and the teachers don"t want to address these problems with the students that don"t contribute to the group work.»
- bättre statestik kurs»
- More courses of Project Management»
- Information about courses that could be choosen outside the master program. Like project management or LEAN. »
- The description of the courses is hard to understand/does not tell much about the course. Please make this better.»
- Some of the courses in, for instance, electronic circuits needs to be far less mathematical in their nature. To engineering students, the world tends to be described as something that drops out of elaborate equations, which is somewhat less intuitive as compared to some more conceptual explainations.»
- Bachelor is extremely broad - good of course but frustrating when you know what you want and have to take so many courses which not belong to your future branch. It is however a strength to be "allmänbildad" and it is very godd that the theoretical basis is established, using maths as a tool and as a way of solving engingeering problems is very godd (this is the distinction between civilingenjör and höskoleingenjör, it is very clear at Chalmers byggingenjör vs väg och vatte that the theoretical and mathematical basis is much higher at väg och vatten).»
- We had no mandatory course they should include that and I think they did by now.»
- I think a Research design and methods course would be good to have already during the bachelor program, and maybe also one in project management. Also, to get some education using MS Excel would be really good I think, and a lot more useful than for instance Matlab. I chose the IT-bas, and the step to that from the mandatory programming course was too big for someone who hadn"t been programming before I think. I"m overall a bit skeptic towards the teknikbaser, since they feel quite unfocused in relation to the bachelor program. Although it"s of course nice to be able to form also your bachelor education to some extent.»
- The course in industial economy seems incredibly unnecessary. It should probably be replaced. »
- I would like a stronger mathematical base by adding MVE085. One more course in signal processing and to remove (or improve by actually inserting useful knowledge) courses like: FFR101 EDA497 TDA289 TEK225»
- Improving of the connection to sustainable development Improve Miljö- och resursanalys för hållbar utveckling - for a very nice example, look at Sustainable development and the design professions (AMU 019). I"d reccommend it to all engineer students at Civil Engineering»
- The non topic courses such as the MTS courses and the communication has big room for improvements. Also the "teknisk bredd" courses feel squeezed in and are just time consuming but haven"t given me much extra for the master or my professional life.»
- I"m satisfied»
- More engineering courses such as cintrol and mechanics and transforms should be addad to the bachelor in my opinion.»
- More 3d-modeling.»
- More basic structural courses and less courses like "Teknisk samhällsplanering, materia-vågteori, geologi, hydraulik, BIS.»
- Miljökursen är helt bortkastad. Borde göras om i grunden och vara en naturligare del av alla kurser. Mer 3D-modellering.»
- Better spread of the profile courses throughout the 2 years. As it is now, 3 of the 5 profile courses are on the same period Q2, which limits our choice of courses and makes planning courses a headache.»
- Adjust "Reglerteknik" to fit the program»
- More about acoustics, it"s only mentioned in one course right now.»
- Ingenjörsmetodik didn"t feel very useful. I would like to have had a course in computer sketching, using i.e. photoshop and Illustrator, early on in the program.»
- Mekanik och bärande konstruktioner»
- ---»
- no»
- samhällsplaneings delen, trafikdelen»
- Hållbar produktutveckling does not fit in. Bättre kurs i energiteknik. »
- 1) Drastically increase the difficulty of the program (way too easy at the moment). Also, make it "more time consuming". Full time at Chalmers is more like part time (50%) at other international universities. 2) Exams/projects etc should focus on understanding, problem solving, and critical thinking rather than just memorizing the book/lectures 3) Make the economics/management courses more quantitative 4) Make the courses more interactive (more case discussions during class) 5) Introduce course about mathematical optimization (and how it could be used in industrial management) 6) Combine a few of the management courses and introduce new management courses »
- Mindre fokus på etanolproduktion med jäst och öppna upp för alla andra fält som finns inom bioteknik.»
- Teknisk kommunikation 1-3 - Känns som gymnasiekurser och tar upp saker som man redan bör kunna från gymnasiet. Bör plockas bort helt från programmet och eventuellt ersättas med någon typ av kemi-kurs. H-ING programmet kan behöva en projektkurs som t.ex går ut på att genomföra ett lite större projekt som har något att göra med kemi eller kemiteknik. »
- I don"t think that "Materie- och vågteori" should be complusory for studying MPSEB (not that I know of yet in study period 4 of the 1st year)... Improvement could be made in early informing TIBYL-students of necessary courses to be allowed to apply for masters programs and also courses needed to be able to achieve "Civilingenjör" apart from achieving a master of science. If the students are informed about this earlier (already in end of the 1st year of the bachelor), the student could more easily plan his/her "study-path" and what courses to choose and in which study period to put them (to make it work with the schedule), especially if courses outside the regular plan are needed (e.g an MTS-course).»
- More projects, more shape-related courses»
- Perhaps it would be wise to exclude the part of navigation and instead add another elective course in for e.g.customs handling or pure transport knowledge with lecturers coming from the business»
- More focus on programming and better course in it. While not a specific topic, extremely useful and necessary, both for studies and for work.»
- More connection to industry»
- more math like a course in Fourier series and Laplace transformation. In Applied mechanics Fourier series would be good to read.»
- I am very satisfied with my bachelor program, no adjustments»
- Advanced form design Ergonomics design for all »
- Evaluate if the technical courses is relevant, e.g. fluid mechanics. Open up for digital product evaluation courses.»
- Graphical Interfaces is necessary, but the actual course needs improvement. In a lot of courses there is conflicting information on deadlines, dates etc.»
- -Generally, the need to work with stress, bad confidence, and the education to form ONE single type of architect! - we need computers! - bad course - bostadens rum, (too stressfull). you learn more when not work during hig pressure and stress. -Att undersöka arkitektur, not a necessary course.»
- Increase the possibilities to take more courses in electronics and circuit theory.»
- The course Statistical Inference MVE155 should be given and preferably mandatory for Teknisk matematik. I felt that the course were to simple, the majority of the course had been done in previous courses in mathematical statistics.»
- Need a red thread in the third year. The courses are somewhat in different areas and don"t depend on each other. »
- Need more programming and a better intro to MATLAB + Mathematica, programming is essential in both industry and research. Make some of the courses in quantum physics, solid state physics and subatomic physics elective. Not everyone wants to work in this area. »
- Fler valbara kurser, mer information om tillämpningar av kurser, »
- No real need to take modules in digital design/electronics or control theory for purposes of MPWPS programme.»
- The optics course needs to be removed, it gives nothing and rather destroys the formalism and knowledge of the electromagnetic fields course. There SHOULD be a course in analytical mechanics (at least a choice). The course in Mathematical physics SHOULD be compulsory (let it take the optics place!). The course in enviromental physics where mostly just meh and didn"t give much »
- I did not study at chalmers during my bachelor studies.»
- -»
- it was good overall, can"t find out anything particualar to improve»
- Better math knowledge is needed, almost all math courses are taken in the first or second year. Familiarity with Matlab is needed as well. »
- I would have appreciate to work more in advance with Matlab»
- Less theory. More practical implementations of for instance mathematics.»
- Smaller classes or more resources! The size of the class prevent my development and learnings. For instance when working in groups we have normally been 7-8 persons, that has moved the focus on learning, to solving group problems »
- Teknisk Fysik är jävligt maxat, om man skulle ta bort nåt skulle det inte vara vad det är. Men samtidigt känns många av kurserna väldigt onödga med tanke på vad de aldra flesta gör nu. Det skulle vara bra med lite med valfrihet i trean. »
- More programming. »
- Try to schedule long lab exercises in a way that does not interfere to much with the regular courses. »
- A cad course that is not revit maybe»
- Optikkursen borde strykas. De väsentliga delarna tas ändå upp i andra kurser. Gör möjligen kursen valfri och flytta den till läsperiod 3 i tredje året (bland övriga valfria) och gör istället både hållfasthetslära och reglerteknik obligatorisk.»
- ORGANISATION. Students to have a life outside of school and should be able to plan this life. It is unacceptable that we did not get a proper shedule in time (and sometimes not at all). More knowledge about different programs would also be nice, as well as more co-operation with students from other programs.»
- Not Much. Long time ago I did it to so my opinions are probably not the most relevant or even valid anymore.»
- Too many compulsory courses »
- I think it should be mandatory to take both the system control and strength of material courses during the first year.»
- A MISSING SHIP DESIGN COURSE (DESIGN USING CAD) THEORY AND APPLICATION, MORE TRACKS not only Structural such as (YACHTS AND MOTORYACHTS) , Regulation course/Classification Society, ocean engineering, (DNV,Lloyds)»
- Materie- och vågteori, Byggnadsmaterial,Byggnadsfysik- och installationsteknik,teknisk samhällsplanering»
- NA»
- Behavioral Sciences and Economics»
- Electrical engineering needs a course in machine oriented programming. A course in C for example.»
- Computer Science: More math.»
- More courses with programming tasks. I also would have liked to have more digital signal processing courses.»
- Remove reglerteknik from computer science, this course should not be mandatory for the Bachelor, but instead be necessary for specific master programs. »
- Games and Learning felt a bit too vague and fluffy.»
- More Real Estate courses »
- Some compulsory interniship for 2-4 weeks or something where you could have an assignment that is connected to your intership»
- A corse in matlab, I have used it in half of my corses and is still not god at it.»
- Slopa meningslösa moment så som matlagning. Fortsätt utveckla de fyra barerna, vissa är bättre än andra i dagens läge.»
- Many courses had a level which was too low. Only had one course in innvoation, was difficult to know what the MPMEI was. »
- More choices for elective courses.»
- I think it would be useful if some (not all) more courses focused on "open problem" projects rather than an exams. I feel like this is a bit of a diificult transiition when coming to the master"s where you end up with problems which are much more "open" in their problem statement.»
- Was a long time ago since I did my bachelors, hard to reflect on bad courses, alot has probably changed since I did it.»
- More presentation technique»
- The area that needs to be strengthened is electromagnetic theory which is the core of my master program.»
- More focus on economic aspects.»
- Very much to do during the second period the first year.»
- More open and understanding professors. Exams on the same day is not nice.»
- The lecturers, head of program and so on need to be more interested in the students and more engaged in general. The demands on how much work the students put into the design projects could be higher in some of the early courses. I would have learnt more if the expectations from other students and teacher were higher on my work, but of course only if the teachers would care more. More engaged teachers - students work harder - students learn more. »
- Make it a programme, not just a collection of courses.»
- Closer connection between master program and research projects, e.g. PhD projects setting the theme of courses or more internally proposed thesis subjects in conjunction with ongoing research. »
- Perhaps its strengths sometimes might be the opposite. Some courses seems too far away from what mechanical engineering should be about. Perhaps have these courses as ones you can choose from as an electable course. »
- The courses "Reglerteknik" and "Transformer, signaler och system" is totally irrelevant for this an education in Computer Science. They are not related to any of the other things we"ve read. The course "Reglerteknik" is the worst of them, as it"s really hard to get a grip on what is going on in it, together with a teacher who believes students know more than they do, and a book that is too difficult.»
- Financial Management needs modification...urgently The whole program of TIPMA needs better planning»
- More sustainability thinking in chemistry courses»
- Lessened group management focus within the project courses.»
- Closer connections to the industry and better structure and information»
- hårdare kritiktillfällen, portfoliosamtal efter varje år, bättre engagemang från de flesta professorer. »
- My bachelor needs to be more modernized. During my time we didn"t read anything about computer science or programming, two subjects that are crucial to have some knowledge about when working with product development today. Also the program need to give more courses in digital visualizing programs such as photoshop, illustrator, and video editing and design. »
- Needs to be more technical, very difficult to get job, one year after examination i am still unemployed, can"t get job as a "lab rat" which I am very overqualified for.The Biotechnology program should seriously be considerd to be removed, it doesn"t belong at a technical university and it doesn"t lead to a qualified job for many students.»
- more math coures»
- More connections with the industry. Guestlecturers from architecture firms, construction firms etc.»
- The soft sides that are implemented must make more relevance. Seems like they are there just for the sake of it.»
- No comments»
- I didn,thave photonics courses and it was hard for me to underestand them in a high level between my MP"s courses!»
- Många av miljökurserna var väldigt lika.»
- More financial focus»
- not applicable»
- "Lisebergsprojektet" should be reintroduced in the first year if possible»
- Software course»
- Industriautomation - verkar vara en utfyllnadskurs när vi läser så mycket mer avancerade kurser på området redan första året sensorer signaler och system - mdet måste göras något ibörjan på den här kursen då den tar matematiken bokstavligen till en annan dimension. Det ar ungefär fram till sista veckan innan man förstår hur lätt det är och det är inte alla som kommer dit. Därför är det antagligen en så hög kuggprocent på framför att första kursen. Någon form av introduktion behövs i början för att man skall förstå men inte inte är så teoretisk. Sedan tror jag även där att man behöver berätta hur detta tillämpas rent praktiskt. Än idag vet jag inte vad många av de saker vi lärde oss att räka på faktiskt gör i vekligheten.»
- More numerical analysis and statistics. There is basically just one statistics and one numerical analysis course in the bachelor program, which seems strange considering their importance.»
- The courses from Nuclear Chemistry department could improve alot!»
- Explain more terms in the beginning. Do not assume that new students know the lingo.»
- Termodynamik»
- Make elteknik mandatory»
- More focus on service design. Or at least being able to choose courses in that subject. »
- Learning how to test programs properly. Doing backend for the web.»
- More possibility to choose courses in the last year. I Know many people want to skip some of the third year courses in chemical engineering since they did not choose a Chemical Engineering Masters programme and some people want to skip for example Solid State Physics in favour of some other course since they arent applying for a Physics Master. As examples.»
- I would have liked more programming and more freedom of which courses I would like to read. »
- MATLAB teaching. Add more teachers for help. 1/class is not enough.»
- More diverse sub-programs would be good.»
- The connection between product development and entrepreneurship should be discussed during all the three initial year, at least in the project courses»
- Communication Principles»
- more portfolio feedback and evaluation. (once every semester) Perhaps a system with the possibility to have a personal mentor. »
- Better programming courses, programming is the most important thing for engineers today, and Mechatronics engineers shouldnt be given bad courses in C.»
- Have never used the knowledge gained from "Tillämpad matematik" even though I enjoyed taking the course»
- mindre arkekturkurser »
- Some of the sustainibility courses are simillar»
- More availability to wood cnc machine»
- Skip the narrow focus in the construction industry and push that you can do other stuff than working as a construction manager»
- I was not supposed to choose the MP that I did. I had to take 3 more courses to be albe to apply. The number of MPs available after I is too few I Think.»
- I believe that you signals and control track is useless. You don"t benefit anything from the biomedical related topics for this track. Also the track is not very well designed since you have to take courses in period 3 and 4 which is when you would normally do your thesis. There are just too many mandatory courses in the biomedical program that are not usefull for most tracks! »
- I would have benefitted from reading Strength of Materials (Hållfasthetslära). The most important change between master and bachelor has been that I now get feedback on everything I do. In the bachelor you only got a grade, but never any comments on anything (except for the bachelor thesis).»
- Some teachers must learn how to respect and teach students»
- I think that the content of most courses has been interesting and useful, but Mekatronik SSY060, Tillverkningsteknik MPR094 were both quite poorly arranged. Bad lectures, confusing content. No red thread. Also the Statistics course (TMS062) had a questionable way of teaching. On-line. Didn"t offer enough possibilities to ask questions or work together. Mekanik och hållfasthetslära 1 and 2(MTM020, MTM025) posed quite bad excecises and it was hard to follow the logics (not only due to the students being unused to the "engineering way of thinking") I think that the excercises and lectures could have been better synced. That you"d have group works replacing part of the homework. »
- Större koppling till applikationer i "verkliga livet"»
- i think everything was good, it"s nive to try different courses even if your will chose a MP that has nothing to do with some of them.»
- Dynamiska system och reglerteknik, modify the environment course.»
- Mer utbildning i digitala verktyg behövs tidigt i utbildningen och mindre "flum" på konstlabben. Tydligare ramverk/kriterier för inlämning och för bedömning vid kritik, vore konstruktivt.»
- Good focus on water courses, gives a wide background. Lack of other choices, want more courses about traffic»
- Would like to have more courses regarding CAD. »
- CIU220 and MVE380 could use improvements (but should be kept in the program).»
- Did not attend at Chalmers»
- No opinion»
- Remove courses that has nothing to do with what people want to do (such as Control theory, if we wanted to learn that we would not have chosen Computer Science)»
- AutoCad would be useful to learn! Also, more continuous teaching in Matlab would help. »
- The MTS course...»
- More lectures and more useful lectures which not only are pp reading»
- We would really benefit from having around 1p of experience in the simulation software ADS. It felt like we didn"t have experience enough when we started with it.»
- structure of the risk management, it is an important course but is not well tought»
- n.a.»
- There should have been more elective courses related to power engineering»
- Dont know»
- The level could have in general been higher, including the level of seriousness, level of how challenging the I-related courses were, level of engagement from the faculty/teachers, level of time givin for support/tutoring within projects, level of width and depth of course material.»
- Reglerteknik»
- -More matlab and more matlab-tutorials!! (really important too improve!) -There are three courses (KMS,KMV and PPHS) that are more or less the same. One/two of these could be exchanged to more beneficial courses, like matlab »
- The bachelor program has to be structured in a way that will fit and make it easier for students to get into other MPs either than (only) MP in Maritime Management. Actually, I"d no other choice than studying Maritime Management - very unfortunate! Areas like: Strength of Materials, Mathematics (Fler Variable, Complex numbers, Statistics, etc.), Mechanics, Electrical System, among others needs to be upgraded/introduced to make the students more competitive in applying for other MPs both at Chalmers and other Universities.»
- More electromagnetic theory.»
- Kemiteknik miljö samhälle, Kemisk miljövetenskap, Produkter och processer i ett hållbart samhälle.»
- -»
- More understanding in differential equations, better motivations for why linear algebra is important.»
- more contact with the industry»
- Fysiken omkring oss (Was bad, but the course has changed now.. Can not comment on the result) Programmeringsteknik (This course could be improved upon, to fit the needs of a student of engineering physics better.. Also: WHY WOULD ANYONE THINK IT IS A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE A WRITTEN PROGRAMMING EXAM, USING PEN AND PAPER?!?!?!?!) Optik (USELESS COURSE! REMOVE IT IMMEDIATELY!!! This course is nothing but a repetition of things we already know from secondary school... And, the few things that are new is presented in other courses, in a much better way. So.. just remove this garbage!) Strömningsmekanik (A good and relevant topic.. but some people should not be allowed to lecture!)»
- add some basic programming, maybe a smaller course in electronics»
- This goes for all courses except for economics of innovation : Make them harder, they are too easy. Further it would be nice to see the use of the technical courses to higher the motivation.»
- More contact with industry. What employment opportunities you have.»
- More software tutorial (in English if possible)»
- Would be good with a course that makes use of a (little) more advanced functional programming, since the academic maturity at the beginning of the programme was low and a lot of things had been forgotten. it was a big step to suddenly do advanced functional programming. Also, a 2 week course in terminal usage would be good.»
- More option to focus on eligible courses that are useful for the master and enhance possibility to become multidisciplinarily profiled (elige architectural courses for instance)»
- The Haskell course from the first year D was not enough to prepare one for the Advanced Haskell course.»
- Bättre pedagogiska undervisningar!»
- Mer applicering av kurser till verkligheten. Lära oss mer vad man ska kunna när man är klar. Byggjuridik?»
- i think the courses could improve in terms of understanding them in relation to previous courses. some more reflection on the context of the courses would be nice i think. i.e. why is this course needed, what does it enable us to do that we could not do before.»
- In Kemiteknik med Fysik we had several courses together with Teknisk Fysik and were supposed to perform as well as them but with much less preparation. It was tough from time to time.»
- More digital sketch, remove some totally unnessecary courses like färglära»
- Broader range of elective courses, higher level of english lecturers, more focus on academic career rather than just outside the university.»
- no comment»
- Higher standard overall, clearer guidlines from teachers. »
- Non.»
- I think Economics of Innovation course is such an useful course for us but it was not a good quality. So, it should be changed. Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation has more than 30 articles and they should be decreased because time consuming and do not add so much. For me, most important thing is to be together in the projects with Swedish people. For some courses you have to choose your own team and in this case we are generally with the all international in a team. Hence, may be there should be a rule like minimum 2 international student in each team with Swedish. Some rules like that can work.»
- I don"t know.»
- The level of diffikulty to pass certain exams should b elower.. around 30-50% fails/exam is not a good quality for the education.. 10-20% are more reasonable.»
- A small course in working with advanced excel which is frequently ised by companies, should be included in the program. And more teaching in eg. Autocad and Revit, which is programs that in the master can be used to in a simple way illustrate models. »
- In need of much better administration around the courses. We almost never got scheduels and other course-related information in time. REA»
- -»
- Many semi compulsory courses have very similar material so you feel like repeating a lot.»
- don"t know »
- More signals, more signal related math»
- Matlab and numerical analysis»
- Teach us c++ please.»
- Make it tougher from the start»
- More use of different programming languages, such as C++. Also, Reglerteknik and TSS? Be gone!»
- Remove overlapping courses, specifically Production Management. Industrial Marketing did not appeal at all to me. Poor level in both these. Would like to see a dedicated course of Matlab in first year. »
- Mekanik 2 has an horrendous examination with awful completion rates.»
- idk»
- Tillämpad Matematik does not fit in the programme Medicinska Signaler och System med Elektricitetslära Mekanik med biologiska exempel»
- More help with the programming courses... »
- More programming in other languages than Java, some c# perhaps, some web programming could also be useful. Photoshop course or something similar would be good if aming for ixd master»
- Increase knowledge and engineering aspects in the mathematical statistic course»
- Tycker en del kurser varit rätt basic, t.ex. Freight Transport Systems, vilken var en bra kurs för man behöver lära sig innehållet, men väldigt enkel.»
- More engineering courses like math and physics. Some courses in economics can easily be packed. The typical I-courses are actually to easy to fit as a university course.»
- The bachelor was very good preparation for applied physics»
- The Elektroteknik program needs an introduction to communication course which I hear is already under way.»
- More biotech related subjects. Ex. statistics related to biotech cases, better laboratory work, more practical experiences »
- The physics part should play a larger role. Some courses do not connect to the others at all. »
- A course in Scientific reasoning and Empiric evaluation. Also, better training in building detailing.»
- Miljökursen. Teknisk samhällsplanering Byggande i samhället Materie och vågteori »
- Don"t need spcialized courses like "Teknisk samhällsplanering". Should be electable»
- The course tillämpadmatematik, I haven´,t used the knowledge from that course in anyother. Try to have a better structure of the course molekylärbiologiskmetodik, its very confusing and unstructured. »
- x»
- Since I studied two degrees related to my current Masters programme, I had more than enough knowledge for the MP»
- Digital sketching»
- Maybe have some more mandatory course/s, for instance the course operating systems that is a very good and relevant course for this programme.»
- My bachelor education is outside Sweden. I feel difficult to follow up some courses which are based on Matlab or R. Because I have no background of coding. I think this is relatively not fair for international students.»
- -»
- if possible more time for developing creative skills. f ex art courses and project with more freedom.»
- That is hard to sum up, but all in all I was very pleased.»
- More clear applications, more projects, and definitely more matlab»
- Industrial chemistry, economics»
- Could be a bit more practical for motivation»
- For the mpsys program more sensor theory should be introduced »
- Make solid state physics an elective course and not a compulsory as it is now. The ones that figured out that they aren"t going to study e.g. applied physics do not get anything from the course. This just makes the course more or less an obstacle you have to get past without gaining from it.»
- nothing»
- Communication theory»
- More work with commercial software»
- I would have liked to have more courses in engineering. Maybe have the option to take courses in engineering or more in-depth physics courses to prepare for PhD studies.»
- - -»
- no comments»
- Tycker överlag kraven kan ställas betydligt högre än idag för att bli godkänd i kurserna. För att bli godkänd behövs inte mycket alls...»
- More presentations from the students»
- The environmental courses, they need to have a better progression and not just tell the same thing. Give the tutors better training in pedagogics (some were very good, but not all). »
- Mekanik, medicinska signaler och system med elektricitetslära, Introduktionskurs.»
- Thermodynamics»

17. How satisfied are you with the information (before applying) about the Masters programme (MP)?

808 svarande

Not at all»		10		1%
Not so satisfied»		55		6%
Neither/Nor»		115		14%
Satisfied»		438		54%
Very satisfied»		168		20%
No opinion»		22		2%

Genomsnitt: 3.94

18. From where did you get the most important information about the programme?

(på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)

The web»		554		67%
Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers»		247		30%
Presentation/Information within Chalmers»		191		23%
Presentations/information outside Chalmers»		13		1%
Written information (not web)»		52		6%
Friends»		253		30%
Other sources (please comment)»		28		3%

- bachelor program coordination, by coincidence» (Other sources (please comment))
- e-mail contact from abroad for further questions» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Students» (Other sources (please comment))
- Indicating that Chalmers need to do a better job of communicating the masters program me» (Friends)
- Master coordinators» (Other sources (please comment))
- From Lena Falkheden och Maja Kovacs» (Other sources (please comment))
- Informal discussions with the head of the programme.» (Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Interaction with Chalmers personnel in India» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Anna Goffe» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Other sources (please comment))
- other students who were studying the prgroamme» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Went to the coordinators office.» (Other sources (please comment))
- Students in Applied Mechanics» (Other sources (please comment))
- Björn Engström» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- In my work for the Student Union.» (Other sources (please comment))
- i learned about Chalmers during my Erasmus stay in Gothenburg University.» (Other sources (please comment))
- I made vigorous research my myself, including elumnis, teachers, industry.» (Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- An external webpage about CAS» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- The written info was from the sheets that have stopped being produced. Also from separate web-page studycas.com.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Written information (not web))
- Just a comment that most of the information about the programmes suck and is poorly written.» (The web, Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Friends)
- Det fanns mycket information att ta till sig. Dock tycker jag inte den helt och hållet återspeglar masterprogrammets (Applied physics) karaktär. För mig som tidigare läst Teknisk fysik blir det dels mycket repetition. För det andra har programmets materialspår ett mycket litet fokus på fysik och känns till stor del som introduktionskurser till området för studenter med en annan bakgrund än fysik. Det borde därför poängteras under informationstillfällena att om man är ute efter en fortsatt fysikutbildning bör man istället välja Physics and Astronomy och välja till kurser från Applied.» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers, Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- Chalmers website and the programme website ixdcth.se» (The web)
- Master programmes should have presentations about their programmes for the bachelor students. If all have them it won"t interfere with the "internal competition". Also they should be allowed to put more on the web. My master programmes web page is very hard to misinterpret. » (The web)
- Students from the MP» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- No comments» (The web)
- Mastersmässan, dock bör den ligga helt i LP1 eftersom den i mitt fall låg efter att vissa kurser som var obligatoriska förkunskapskrav redan hade paserat vilket gjorde att jag fick börja mastern ett år senare och därmed förlängde hela min utbeildning med ett år. Katastrofalt. » (Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- Studievägledaren för programmet på Chalmers» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Facebook groups and CIRC forums» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- Email conversation with the master coordinator David Pallares» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- I spoke to David Pallares on a fair and had no idea before that that I could choose something else as MP than the ones at I. Pure luck » (Presentation/Information within Chalmers)
- I contacted graduates from the program to ask them questions.» (Other sources (please comment))
- dont know» (Other sources (please comment))
- Facebook» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- I had to mail Jonas Nässén, Programme responsible about my questions to get the most important information.» (Other sources (please comment))
- next stop chalmers event outside Sweden» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- The website can be updated better with the current project and Thesis reports.» (The web)
- From Professor Bengt-Erik Mellander» (Friends)
- Professors from my home university.» (The web, Other sources (please comment))
- My own experience as an exchange student before entering the programme.» (The web, Friends, Other sources (please comment))
- Mail contact with David Pallares, the Master Coordinator» (The web)
- Master program in chalmers» (Presentation by Master Coordinators and teachers)
- Mässan som var på ljusgården tyckte jag var bra!» (Written information (not web), Friends)

Your own effort

19. How many hours per week have you spent studying at this programme?

813 svarande

Less than 30 hours/week»		68		8%
Between 30-40 hours/week»		265		32%
Between 40-50 hours/week»		305		37%
Between 50-60 hours/week»		132		16%
More than 60 hours/week»		43		5%

Genomsnitt: 2.77 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

20. How would you grade your studies (within the MP)

Severe problems with more than 2 courses»		35		4%
Some problems but only with one or two courses»		275		34%
No major problems»		443		55%
It was too easy - no real challenge»		47		5%
No opinion»		11

Genomsnitt: 2.62

- No bi g problems with courses but with rooms and building» (?)
- Even though I have severe problems with more than 2 courses (not passed), I enjoy the MP, I learn a lot, I feel well prepared from the BP and I am not worried about completing the MP in a maximum of 2 years time. I am not a person who works well on exam, but with some studying during the summer and some meditation, I will pass the exams. » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- A select few courses did not work, teacher was absent, no course PM, no real course to be honest and a general clusterfuck to work with. Those which have worked have worked great.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- This is not negative, this just means the courses where hard. Functional analysis for example was extremely complicated...» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- had problems with real estate finance and economics and financial accounting and management because no prior study experience» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Unorganized courses, AND MISSING COURSES THAT SHOULD EXIST AND THE STUDENTS LEAVE THE PROGRAM WITH LACK OF KNOWLEDGE ( YACHTS,MOTORYACHTS,OCEAN STRUCTURES, SUBMERSIBLE VESSELS)» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- The problem in my master"s program is NOT that the difficulty is to high, instead it"s the workload! In every course we have a very extensive project which takes up all time and then we also have an exam which one doesn"t have time to study to.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- I would say that a majority of the courses are challenging but due to that, I have learned a lot. » (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- I am not at all interesting in materials or managment which were the type of courses I had problems with.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Some courses has you spend a lot of time on project that does not affect your grade (pass or fail assignments)» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Not sufficient time during the exams, not sufficient time for studying before the exams, a lot of difficulties with Matlab software, Too less dates for the exams (not convenient dates for the people from abroad), too much expensive literature for the course or luck of literature at all.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Due to the workload and very litle time for studies to the exams.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Lack of time! Too heavy work load» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- Having limitiations with understanding, very vulnerable to stressful group works. Would love more eligible multidisciplinary courses» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- All of the courses that I have taken have had 100% exam, the assignment do not have grating. I don"t think that in the real world one day of your whole work will be evaluated to show your knowledge so less focus on the exams and more on projects would be appropriate.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- The academic knowledge and scientific reasoning was not present which made the studies boring. At the same time, the amount of material supposed to be delivered was fairly large. When I finally met a course with some reasonable structure I had left my work ethic, the school and it´,s support.» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- most problems is just because the language» (Severe problems with more than 2 courses)
- TIF155 structure and examination can be improved.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Two courses were large. Since I studied well, they were not really a problem but they took too much effort to make a sound study climate. The other course during that study period got much less attention. (Infrastructural geo engineering and Environmental analysis of water)» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The problems were with the teacher, and the program director took immediate action.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Största, och egentligen enda, problemet jag har haft är bristen på Matlab-introduktioner. Jag, och många andra studenter, kastas in i en kurs där ansvarig förväntar sig bakgrundskunskaper i detta program. Jag, precis som många andra, har aldrig ens öppnat Matlab innan Chalmers och har totalt failat på dessa uppgifter. De rätta förutsättningarna har inte getts. Jag hade önskat en (ifall förkunskaper saknas) obligatorisk Matlab-kurs om 5poäng i starten av min master FÖRE dessa kurser. Jag har haft stora svårigheter med att klara kurser innehållande Matlab, det ges bristfällig introduktion och de avancerade uppgifterna klarar jag inte av. Vilket reflekteras på mina betyg senare.. jag önskar verkligen kunskaper i detta program, men har inte fått de rätta förutsättningarna» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Problems with lecturers lacking pedagogical skills. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- One re-examination and a grade mean of 4» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- There are some communication problems when the courses are held at GU.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Modelling and simulation!» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Problems/Dissatisfaction because of other students" low level of ambition» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- This was due to poor structure of the courses, hours was spent on just understanding what the courses was including and what we were suposed to do.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I failed one written exam, and it was, in my opinion, partly because the examiner chose a not optimal pedagogical approach. (Read: he was unhelpful.)» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Tycker att mastern kan få fler valbara kurser. Det bör ju trots allt vara möjligt att läsa mer renodlat geoteknik eller vatten eller infrastruktur. I de flesta läsperioder är de valbara kurserna endast 2 st och 2 måste väljas. Jag skulle vilja se möjligheten att skapa sin egen grund bättre så som exempelvis konstruktion har. de har möjligheten att välja installation eller konstruktion. Jag skulle vilja se att det åt åtminstone går att välja kombinationer av vatten/geo, geo/infra och infra/vatten varje läsperiod.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some problems but mostly due to my own overload of work on the side. The one major problem I have with MPALG is that it is badly planned, for the algorithms track there are 3 mandatory courses in study period 3, which makes it impossible to take this track in a normal manner since we only have 1 study period #3, because in the second year you normally do the MSc thesis in that period. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The IDE-project seems like the administration had a good idea but they forgot what was the focus of the course other than "make a project". It could be worth to consider what they want the students to learn and how to achieve that (plus - make a course evaluation of the IDE-project!) None of the courses were "too hard" while not offering help» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Since I"m a V-student studying a MP given by A, I don"t have all necessary knowledge to do all tasks in all courses» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The problems have not been to pass the courses, the problem was having a normal life outside of the school while passing courses... It is kind of laghable how much time most of us put in to the projects and assignments just to pass. I put in 50-60 hours a week only because I"m not sure. One thing I am sure about is that I spent maybe 2-3 full weekends away from Chalmers. The first 2 periods up until christmas in the 1st year I spent the weekend between periods at home, and the very first one in september. Otherwise I was at Chalmers 8 o clock daily. Possible? ofcourse, we did it. Fair? nope. Did my personal life suffer? Yep. Friends family and romantic life all went south to the point where I daily questioned my choices and if this was to be my life.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The courses were not impossible, if you don´,t have a family och a hobby. The combination of this master and a private life is impossible.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some courses have increased load compared to others. If you happen to chose two courses in one period with heavy load, you are going to have a hard period.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Machine Learning course didn"t meet expectations» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Especially the courses in Finite Element Method. Also the Geotechnics...» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Scope of some courses are very similar, thus we end up studying same thing twice. and these courses are all compulsory so no real choice in selecting a different course.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Took some time to gain enough programming skills.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I have some time-consuming extracurricular activities and I take heavy courses on my MP, which makes it very hard to find the time to get good grades.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The workload varies a lot between the different courses. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- No course choices during the spring that interested me.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Clearing ner buisness kursen var värdelös, saknade struktur och upplägget kändes som ett experiment. Samma gäller betygsättningen där nästan samtliga fick samma betyg. I övrigt har de flesta kurser varit väldigt bra. Strategic management kursen var inte jätte bra heller med liknande problem problem.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- losing related the swedish information» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Very repetitive. Not really taking that much knowledge with me from the courses (it"s just lots and lots of group projects)» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The problems I had was not due to the level of difficulty in the program, but to my own abilities when it comes to mathematics :)» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The feedback from students is taken seriously and in case of problematic courses there are improvements » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- When teaching a course in Artificial Neural Networks you really dont expect statistical mechanics and there was alot... Then even more of advanced physics math for computational biology... not really connected the Complex Adaptive Systems thinking.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some courses were really tough but most were not. Some Courses were a bit too easy perhaps» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The quality differs a lot between courses.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- KKR072 Computational fluid dynamics for engineers - Lecture time was basically wasted. The lectures were compressed and gone through in the beginning of the course when you didn"t have time to read through the book yet and knew nothing about the theory. I"m confident that it would have been better to go through the basics of the whole course and project in the beginning (2-3 lectures). Having some CFD excercises to gain some understanding of the practise and then starting the proper lecture series with all the detailed Theory. Secondly they had introductions to Masterthesises during excercise time (which was already compressed), which would have been very inspiring if the students would have been informed before AND if they kept the presentations to a max. 10 minutes and not 30-40 minutes. ENM045 Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering - I think a increadibly useful course when it would have had a red thread. Clear goals of what to learn and calculation excercises. The teacher also take the critic personally, and didn"t want to adapt to requests. The co-teacher was very difficult to hear. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some ways of teaching were very different from others, it was hard at times to understand what was supposed to be done and what regulations had to be followed. There was some confusing information related to a couple of courses.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some courses were way too much work, we were at campus very many hours and even on the weekend, even though I heard it is not supposed to be like that in Sweden. We complained to the teachers but not much was changed.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some of the courses timetable collides with others, which makes it almost impossible to flexibly choose courses of interest within the program. Some of the courses lacked relevant and appropriate course literature books.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- For reasons I mentioned earlier.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- My main problem was to get ECTS-point from my courses during my ERASMUS-semester (in Münich) accredited for in MPSES.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Hard in the beginning to start a Industrial Engineering program, but you got the hang of it after the first courses.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- No general following up of thesis students by the programme make many of them fall behind.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I have special health issues/Panic attacks which affects my study progress» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Had difficulties due to private circomstances. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Sometimes the workload have been very high with up to 60-70 hours per week which have been very stressful and hard.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The sustainability side did not receive as much weight/attention as I expected from course and university information. » (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- My bachelor education is outside Sweden. I feel difficult to follow up some compulsary courses which are based on Matlab or R. Because I have no background of coding. I think this is relatively not fair for international students.Basic computer courses should be provided.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- The two FEM courses were hard. Went well in the end though.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Bad communication/chemistry with some teachers» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- I really depends what you classify as "problems". Coming from a BSc in engineering physics, working tremendously hard and still fail a lot of courses is "problematic". Sure, there has been hectic times during the MP but it is nowhere to compare with the BSc although the level of difficulty varies greatly within the MP. Some courses are as the BSc and others are not at all cumbersome.» (Some problems but only with one or two courses)
- Some courses have been somewhat easy. but at the same time they require a lot of time.» (No major problems)
- demanding coures could require quite some time, but I always had the feeling I can study everything I need to pass and for any problems always ask for help somewhere » (No major problems)
- The 3rd study period was very challenging. » (No major problems)
- The thing is that the bachelor program of Kemiteknik med Fysik is very demanding so the MP I think was much easier.» (No major problems)
- In some lectures the theoretical background could be extened, though.» (No major problems)
- It depends on the involvement. » (No major problems)
- I really liked the first semester on MPQOM it was a great start and the teachers were very good. The first course with case every week was one of the best on my time here at chalmers. » (No major problems)
- Meta: "problem" should be defined.» (No major problems)
- No problems with the courses but a lot to do during the program. » (No major problems)
- Very interesting and developing at the same time as good information and staff contact decreases possible problems» (No major problems)
- Average of 4.5 as of now. (max is 5)» (No major problems)
- I"m not entirely sure if the question is about how satisfied I am with the courses or how high I find the workload to be...» (No major problems)
- Some courses like project management and design management have a way to low level of the requirements.» (No major problems)
- One exam was really bad, MEN115 Energy systems modelling and planning.» (No major problems)
- I am no wizkid, it is more the quality of courses and my prior knowledge that have helped me get through the programme with no major problems so far.» (No major problems)
- In general there should be more information regarding written reports (rules, styles, etc), oppositions (this is not common in so many other places) and presentations. What is considered good, correct, incorrect, etc (to have the same level as students that have studied here before)» (No major problems)
- The time spent has varied a lot between different reading periods, depending on what courses I have read. For example: in reading period one I had time for all my spare time activities and more, but in reading periods 2 and 3 there were a lot to do. I remember that I needed to skip much of my spare time activities during three weeks in reading period 3.» (No major problems)
- I have been studiying very hard at it has wetn very good - because I like the subjects belonging to my future branch (such courses were very few in the bachelor). The MP is a challenge, it is a much higher work load than the bachelor (this is at least what me and my friends felt during the first term at the MP - suddenly all courses had like three ways of examninations (projektarbete, individuell inlämning, tentamen, ibland obligatoriska övningar och inlämningar också) instead of one, which was the standard in the bachelor)» (No major problems)
- Two re-exams I have now passed, which is a lot better than my performance during the bachelor program :)» (No major problems)
- Spring semester of year 1 has seriously been a big joke, the courses have major problems. Both software architecture and agile development processes are in need of re-structuring» (No major problems)
- there are probably good researchers in Chalmers but i am not convinced about their teaching abilities. Research & teaching are two different things, both very important.» (No major problems)
- No problems with the understanding, but problems with bad information about and during some courses » (No major problems)
- Problem with studio rooms! They are not suited for education.» (No major problems)
- Some courses where to easy.» (No major problems)
- One course was especially bad I think, and is not coherent with the others: Information Theory.» (No major problems)
- Challenging programme, requires a lot of commitment to do well. » (No major problems)
- I think it really depends on all your group members in the different courses. Espacially in the PD-project» (No major problems)
- Specially with huge classes (more than 50 people). Some courses are common with other Master programs and the previous knoledge may be very different between students. I would have appreciate less student (more availability to ask questions in class) and a more customized class contents to my master.» (No major problems)
- Certain lecturer might have bias on international students and that is not something suppose to happen in Chalmers. » (No major problems)
- No problems at all until the master thesis.» (No major problems)
- It took A LOT of time to get through all the projects of the courses. However passing in general was usually not a problem.» (No major problems)
- Alot of work, but in a good way.» (No major problems)
- IN some courses the leadership and the structure of the courses where major problems.» (No major problems)
- Severe problem with idea evaluation » (No major problems)
- Maybe an external personal problems that have effected my focus during the study time, apart of that everything seems to be fine. » (No major problems)
- In terms of examination easier than expected. However, relying a lot on group projects which demands time and effort» (No major problems)
- I assume the questions 19, 20 and the following questions is about the master program, not the bachelor program. In some reading periods, I would say the teacher expect too much effort from the students, e.g. now in lp4 (first year). » (No major problems)
- Many of the courses were a bit too easy, but I guess it gets easy as it has been most courses that I really wanted to read now.» (No major problems)
- No comments» (No major problems)
- I have maintained pretty much the same level or higher in completing courses compared to my bachelor.» (No major problems)
- Not sure about what is meant with "problems". Is it that I encountered problems in courses and found them though to finish? Or is it problems from the people in charge of the course? The studies were not easy but it was not because the people in charge.» (No major problems)
- I worked very hard for my degree! it is not easy» (No major problems)
- I"m studying a lot more effectively than before.» (No major problems)
- small issue with software slowed me down on one project» (No major problems)
- In case this question doesn"t refer to mu own effort and although most courses didn"t have major issues, there were a couple of them the quality of which was unacceptable. Some lecturers" insufficient english language and pedagogical skills made a few courses disappointing.» (No major problems)
- Heavy workload but manageable if ambitious» (No major problems)
- Functional analysis has been the only really hard course.» (No major problems)
- It"s what you choose to make of it, it can be challenging if you are ambitious» (No major problems)
- Challenge with the venture not with the academic part» (No major problems)
- No major problems but challenging, I have spent lot of time studying and completing the tasks in each course. Everything has procceded good though. » (No major problems)
- Some courses difficult, but manageble if you put your back into it» (No major problems)
- Very varying work load, for example the course Adv. Organic Chemistry took more than full time (>40h/w) which was overpowering and people should be warned to not take that course at the same time as "Polymer Chemistry and Physics" because I had stomach ache for a month after these courses were finished! At the same time many other courses in this program has consumed much less time.» (No major problems)
- För att bli godkänd krävs inte mycket. Den största förändringen och utmaningen är att göra allt på engelska.» (No major problems)
- It was not too easy, but I had no major problems either. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The most difficult aspects were long lecture hours, co-ordination with other students and coping with uninteresting reads. The actual studies has been quite easy.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- There are some many courses that basically are just a reformulation of previous courses, e.g. Condensed Matter Pysics and Electrodynamics. Other courses (Surface and nano physics and Modern Imaging) are just meagre in content. Yet other courses (Non-equilibrium processes) are simply disconnected from previous courses.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- I am used to harder courses from my Bachelor programme» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- It can be a challenge, but one has to work hard for it to be so. The default study plan is too easy in my opinion. I believe that getting a five on the courses should imply a deep understanding of the theory behind courses.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- i would like the teachers to be tuffer and more challenging and have more computer competence.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- More or less all intensive work is during lp3 and lp4.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Compared to bacholor courses the studies in this master was pretty easy. Not high workload and with biotechnoloy background alot of the courses were really easy. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- As mention above, the program has been way too easy. Need to make it more difficult (and greater focus on critical thinking, problem solving, and understanding)» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Depends of wich courses you take, some are a joke (like the materials track) if you take courses from teh computational track not so and if you take from fundamental physics definitely not.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Även om jag pluggar mer än 60 timmar per vecka måste jag säga att Masterprogrammet (Applied Physics) är för lätt. Min nedlagda studietid beror på att jag för att överhuvudtaget få en utmaning dels läser 150% (tre kurser per läsperiod) varav många kommer från Fundamental Fysik. Om jag hållt mig till Applieds kurser hade jag lagt ner många timmar färre. Av de kurser jag läst från Applied Physics har samtliga varit extremt enkla (förutom Physics of Electromagnetic Materials / Functional Materials vilken håller en mycket hög nivå och klass).» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The exams did not assume much reasoning skills or knowledge on the part of the students. High grades were attainable by just having a basic grasp of the material that was presented.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The quality is okay, but the level is very low. » (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Väldigt mycket lättare än bachelor"n» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- I am studying more than 60h/week because I am studying at about 180%. This is because the master"s courses are at a too low level compared to the bachelor"s program (teknisk fysik). The only courses that are actually on the same or at a harder level are the ones within my own program (Physics and Astronomy). Make the courses harder on all other programs please! We are here to learn things, not sit around and get useless credits...» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Coming from engineering physics it feels like i"ve only been intelectaully challenged on 3-5 lectures tops during the entire year, which is a real shame.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- The courses are too general - most is common sense» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- So far, only a course was a bit more challenging. Some courses have been a bit redundant with my prior knowledge and/or studies.» (It was too easy - no real challenge)
- Very odd question, am I grading my own performance or the difficulty of the course? » (No opinion)
- Since I"m doing an erasmus year it"s hard to say anything about this» (No opinion)
- I don"t understand this question? What is grading in this sence? Either it was no major problems or it was to easy? Is this about workload?» (No opinion)
- Exchange student.» (No opinion)
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.77

Goals and goal fulfilment

21. Have you seen the goals of the Masters programme (before now)?

Yes (more than 5 times)»		82		10%
Yes (between 2 and 5 times)»		286		35%
Yes (once)»		285		35%
No»		156		19%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

22. How understandable are the programme goals?

The goals are difficult to understand»		25		3%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		267		34%
The goals are clear enough»		428		55%
The goals are very clear»		50		6%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

23. Do you think the goals are reasonable for a master degree?

No, the goals are set too low»		6		0%
No, the goals are a bit too low»		50		6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		695		91%
No, the goals are a bit high»		11		1%
No, the goals are set far too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

24. Do you think the goals are fulfilled within the programme?

No, not at all»		9		1%
To some extent»		107		13%
Almost»		262		34%
Yes, definitely»		276		35%
No opinion»		116		15%

Genomsnitt: 3.49

Programme layout/structure/design

25. How satisfied are you with the programme curriculum?

Not at all»		15		1%
Not so satisfied»		73		9%
Neither/Nor»		142		17%
Satisfied»		476		59%
Very satisfied»		93		11%

Genomsnitt: 3.69

26. Is there any subject/course that you would like to add into the programme?

Yes»		329		42%
No»		445		57%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- A FEM-course and Acoustics focusing on music» (?)
- Structure course on the Master level» (?)
- I would like to have a course that goes deeper in to energy system simulations.» (?)
- More AI-courses» (?)
- A course for designing composite constructions which include two materials, e.g. steel and concrete structures. » (?)
- Purely Functional Data Structures, Compiling Functional Languages» (Yes)
- Some kind of optional Immunology course!» (Yes)
- More wireless communication courses. More specialization» (Yes)
- Computer graphics, i am very happy i took both the regular and advanced course. It really tests your ability to implement algorithms and it combines the math learned in the bachelor with programming.» (Yes)
- Optimization» (Yes)
- MPCAS and MPENM has a lot of courses that relates to the algorithms-track. They should be added or belong to one of the "tracks"» (Yes)
- The chemical industry on the western coast in Sweden is very large. Providing Chemical engineers the posibility to take more courses in management and economicas would result in more competent personnel on the management positions compared to today.» (Yes)
- MIMO, Standardizations» (Yes)
- Something flood related» (Yes)
- More courses the focus on cellular mechanisms.» (Yes)
- As I wrote before, more focus on software than ASIC design.» (Yes)
- Thermodynamics Advanced courses» (Yes)
- courses within water chemistry and more about water. There is not enough numbers of courses to choose from in each study period. » (Yes)
- Juridisk grundkurs, retorik» (Yes)
- More courses on computation, like computational physics and High performance computing» (Yes)
- Human Computer Interaction, Robotic, Mobile Computing» (Yes)
- More semi compulsory courses» (Yes)
- Industry Design related content, or something similar» (Yes)
- Courses about hydrogeology and generally the possibility to specialize within a field. As it is now, there are very few available choices withing the programme. » (Yes)
- A course in hydrogeology. There should be more courses to choose from in each study period. It is hard to specialize due to few courses to choose from» (Yes)
- More focus on designing graphical interfaces. A web design course would be good.» (Yes)
- Musical acoustics» (Yes)
- Brand management & marketing» (Yes)
- some course in basic C for embedded systems» (Yes)
- More rock and soil mechanics » (Yes)
- More geotechnical courses, including geotechnical laboratory work.» (Yes)
- Some course in programming for those that have not stuidied Java or C. More about sensors - more focus in the Mechatronic Design course?» (Yes)
- Courses related to sustainable/green energies, waste management.» (Yes)
- More advanced cources in the technical aspect of food processes and more connection to companys» (Yes)
- computer adid design» (Yes)
- Innovation» (Yes)
- More relevant electives. Advanced Computer Architecture» (Yes)
- Lean production Operations management Operations research should be added to the master in Quality and Operations management. Operations Strategy Introduction to Quality and Operations Management should be removed. The main reason is that these courses provide little challenge and even less insights. It would be far better to understand Lean production and use mathematical models for Operations management and research instead of spending time on the Operations Strategy Matrix as in the Operations Strategy course and the introduction course which is all over the place even though all the relevant stuff reappear later in the courses. It is mindblowing that we read so little about Lean Manufacturing, it is a shame!» (Yes)
- High performance computing or similar. » (Yes)
- Fluid acoustics and marine acoustics» (Yes)
- see q. 20» (Yes)
- Complexity theory or system analysis courses. A project course where the student can do a CAS-project (like they have in the Mathematics department)» (Yes)
- For me it would be very interesting to have the course TEK050 Business planning for high-growth startups. » (Yes)
- Computer science related courses» (Yes)
- a real finincial course.» (Yes)
- Some kind of additional manufacruting and processes course. Since the most traditional processes might not be usable for some materials that are otherwise studied during the course. I think that even though some processes are treated in courses about a particular material this is to little. » (Yes)
- Business management» (Yes)
- Basic software architecture. Basic course in testing which then used as a base/requirement for more advanced courses.» (Yes)
- refrigeration technology, social cost calculation » (Yes)
- Industrial Ecology» (Yes)
- Algorithms» (Yes)
- More fluid courses» (Yes)
- Make algorithms semi-compulsory. Perhaps make one course in optimization compulsory. » (Yes)
- Quantitative analysis (econometrics)» (Yes)
- sales and marketing» (Yes)
- Some part of the courses could include more practical oriented activities. For instance, we have learnt not only that policies are important but alos how to analyze them from a business perspective.» (Yes)
- More focus on the social aspect of sustainability» (Yes)
- Immunology and an even deeper course in genetics» (Yes)
- Some project where we could apply the knowledge learned in class. In other words, some more practical work.» (Yes)
- How to start your own company, including economy, business plan development etc.» (Yes)
- short matlab course» (Yes)
- More large scale system modeling, which is what we are supposed to learn, but don"t. Use mathematical modeling tools!» (Yes)
- parallellprogramering statistik, stokastisk analys?» (Yes)
- Nuclear Reactor Safety should be mandatory. Maybe there should also be a second part of that course (with more depth).» (Yes)
- A theoretical course on "Classical physics" (mechanics and field theory)» (Yes)
- Offshore Technology Marine Surveying» (Yes)
- an intro course in Matlab! » (Yes)
- More statistics in relation to research in the courses, at least we need to be able to interpret statistics from scientific articles.» (Yes)
- Classical field theory» (Yes)
- Fluid dynamics simulation, aerospace engineering courses, CAD courses with other software (than Catia)» (Yes)
- A course in Category Theory. We did a self-taught course, and we think most students in the logic+programming track would benefit for a (perhaps more systematic) instantiation for that.» (Yes)
- Programming in other language than MATLAB» (Yes)
- corses in adobe and how u put together a project, wich files u should use and so on it would spear ALOT of time during the years» (Yes)
- Advanced electric mesurements or similar» (Yes)
- More about how to work with observing users, identifying needs, obtaining contextual understanding etc (as per the methodology teached at Teknisk Design)» (Yes)
- Software as a service, Web applications, Software engineering project, Computer networks» (Yes)
- more business cases» (Yes)
- Presentation skills, Case solutions» (Yes)
- I feel bad that of all courses, we don"t have any course for bridge Engineering under MPSEB program. Its a very important course and the University has to look for a way of fixing it. Most Universities have it. Imagine International students spend time coming from far countries and in the end they dont have it yet we are expected to perform as Structural Engineers » (Yes)
- Mechatronic Design, Embedded Control Systems, generally make more courses from MPSYS programme available. During LP3 and LP4 of first year on MPBME, you are forced to elect imaging courses even though if you want to study signals and control track, which is strange.» (Yes)
- Atmospheric science and/or analysis of water.» (Yes)
- Plaxis och mer slope. Gärna mer valmöjligheter inom varje ämne så att man som sagt kan välja kurser efter eget tycke och inte bli "tvingad" att läsa kurser som inte intresserar en.» (Yes)
- Computer Science courses» (Yes)
- I think Artificial neural networks and computational methods in bioinformatics could be selected as part of the program, and not only as "optional courses". More things within bioinformatics and other applied, related subjects, I think would be useful since the core courses are all very theoretical. » (Yes)
- Robots» (Yes)
- Natural language processing, applied statistics, data analysis» (Yes)
- Courses that include are more practical (more programming) and less mathematical» (Yes)
- Finance and connect it to quality/operations improvement! - poor connection between finance and engineering» (Yes)
- more courses to choose from in the fall semester» (Yes)
- Maybe underwater acoustics/marine acoustics as it seems to be a growing field of business (although you can read it as distance course, but maybe make more ad for that course)» (Yes)
- More geotechnics» (Yes)
- More electro- and room acoustics» (Yes)
- Drives I course was very general, should be more technical.» (Yes)
- More to select from in general» (Yes)
- design of energy equipment, multiphase flows» (Yes)
- Procurement Management, How to manage large projects.» (Yes)
- A path with more applied food technology and chemistry. So the requirements of the food industry is more synced than today. Information about project management courses or LEAN would be nice to inform about atleast. » (Yes)
- More advanced courses in different areas of Computer Science: Logic: category theory AI/Algorithm: pattern recognition, neural network Language: Language semantics» (Yes)
- Traffic Engineering. Public Transport courses..» (Yes)
- There must be possibilities to chose courses - I mean that Chalmers must provide and offer more courses that are relevant to us, or at least faciliate taking a course or two at other schools with the neededcourses (for example rail way construction, bedrock mechanics, traffic planning). Also, many student would really lika to take courses in project management but there are almost NO opportunities since those courses are only for the DCPM-students. Why can"t Chalmers give additional courses in project management outside the DCPM-MP?» (Yes)
- Hull design» (Yes)
- Organizational Behaviour» (Yes)
- More courses concerning sustainability in product development and eco-design.» (Yes)
- More practical courses.» (Yes)
- Some methodological course (could also be good at the Civil Engineering- MP)» (Yes)
- More possibilities for those that choose the fluid specialisation.» (Yes)
- More on Manufacturing engineering.» (Yes)
- More on the actual method of researching.» (Yes)
- Applied FEM Bridgeconstruction (focus on structural calculation) » (Yes)
- Yes. Some course that could incorporate some selected reasonable Student Union committment as part of leadership and managerial skills project.» (Yes)
- More about health effects from noise.» (Yes)
- More Engine Room stuff. Engines, propulsion systems, machinery systems, etc. The current course on those topics could be divided into two courses to go deeper in the subjects.» (Yes)
- More courses linked to Geotechnics » (Yes)
- Leadership» (Yes)
- Economy! As an engineer you deal with money, and there is only one course in economy in the bachelor programme. It would be good with one more. I would also want more courses to choose between for the autumn period in year to in the mp, especially a course in hydrogeology. » (Yes)
- Industrial economics» (Yes)
- Sustainable Electric Power Production and Transportation (as a semi-compulsory course)» (Yes)
- ISO certifications course» (Yes)
- Course about matlab, LabVieW.» (Yes)
- hydrogeology, more geology, less hydrology! samhällsplanerings kurser» (Yes)
- More applications. » (Yes)
- Antenna engineering, programming» (Yes)
- coding design interface course (app interface design etc.)» (Yes)
- Make a few courses mandatory, such as project management and economics. I believe everyone who works at a company or in a project will find great use from those courses.» (Yes)
- More elective courses since the backgound of the participants differ greately» (Yes)
- Something that covers some practical topics from the industry. Things like regulations, ethics, classifications, etc. Like eHealth, but less focus on eHealth and guest lecturers, and more focus on "real" problems. Some project course, similar to what the Embedded Systems Design has.» (Yes)
- The corrosion course should be at least semielective » (Yes)
- Math, Fourier series if not included in Bachelor level» (Yes)
- MPBDP suffers from tech push, it would benefit from market pull in terms of design processes and iteration.» (Yes)
- There would be nice with some more interaction design courses. I think it would be beneficial to have a closer collaboration with the masters programme Interaction design and technologies to make it possible for more people to take courses in this area.» (Yes)
- More analytical courses in regard to design!» (Yes)
- PLC and SCADA» (Yes)
- Theory Of Distributions, given at GU coursecode :MMA130. Topology MMA100,» (Yes)
- some control courses» (Yes)
- More mathematics» (Yes)
- Machine learning as an alternative mandatory course.» (Yes)
- Add the availability to add courses in programming (a course in C or Python would be good) which is NOT based on an introductory course in a bachelor programme, since such courses tend to focus a lot on the direction of that programme, and most programmers at Applied Physics are computationally oriented, which is not really the same as IT» (Yes)
- Computational electromagnetics module could be included, very relevant for a lot of MPWPS modules.» (Yes)
- Some other course to complete the credits (7,5) of the third semester» (Yes)
- Add a track that leans more into physics combined with the computational (like a combination of the computational track and physics and astronomy programme). As it is now then all materials courses are TERRIBLE! I wouldn"t recommend them to anyone. The level is to low, the speed to slow and the cheat through most of the theory and lacks focus on practicality. Reinstitue quantum matter, add analytical physics and the continuation of electrodynamics (that"s basically just static without dynamics... However it is REALLY GOOD.)» (Yes)
- More "sustainable" courses, course about solar cells and wind power » (Yes)
- A course in patents would be useable» (Yes)
- More entrepreneurship classes» (Yes)
- Statistical Image Analysis» (Yes)
- Technical drawing courses similar to AutoCad or Revit would be good to have in the Master programme (there are courses in these programs in the Bachelors-level but in Swedish, and therefore harder for foreign students to take part in them). Some kind of Urban planning course would be fun to have in the Master programme, could be fun to collaborate our Master programme with other Master programmes, such as Architecture and Urban design (planning)» (Yes)
- I would like to have courses more quantitative such like data analysis in our subjects since this is the thing matter to our future career as well as the key point that company willing to test. » (Yes)
- More specialized courses would be nice. For example another geotechnical course» (Yes)
- More courses with focus on the Swedish construction industry» (Yes)
- Som programmet är upplagt idag är det inte en fysikutbildning. Programmets beräkningskurser verkar hålla en hög kvalitet men om man är ute efter bra fysikkurser bör man välja många kurser från Physics and Astronomy. Jag efterfrågar ett större överlapp mellan de två programmen. Till exempel skulle Advanced Quantum Mechanics mycket väl kunna bli en del av programmets materialspår. Problemet idag är att Applied Physics kurser håller en relativt låg kvalitet och ger liten fysikalisk förståelse medan Physics and Astronomy har många intressanta men kanske inte så industriellt tillämpbara kurser. En mix mellan de båda programmen vore därför att föredra.» (Yes)
- Rail Engineering» (Yes)
- Colaboration with student from other programs, like civil engineering (construction).» (Yes)
- A course on analytical mechanics would be very nice.» (Yes)
- I would like to learn have a skecthing class like it is part of the teknisk design programme. This could be visited but was not advertised as being available in english. I think IxD should work closer together with Industrial Design to provide courses to each others programmes. Industrial Design is unfortunately not very accessible as non-swedish student without bachelor design education. Also graphical interfaces is a very important course but very brief. So there should be a second advanced course that builds up on that. Graphic design basics would be great and I think it will be in high demand for the many tech background students of IxD that want to strengthen their design knowledge.» (Yes)
- If you want to stick to the master programme courses there are very few courses to choose from, mostly just two. I think there should be AT LEAST 3 programme courses to choose from each studie period.» (Yes)
- Ship Design (Theory, CAD) , Yachts and Motor-yachts Design and, Ocean Structures Design.» (Yes)
- More courses to choose between. now there is only one period where you can choose between 3 courses.» (Yes)
- Economics, politics» (Yes)
- More negotiation theory» (Yes)
- behavioral change (towards sustainability)» (Yes)
- Machine oriented programming» (Yes)
- Real Estate courses» (Yes)
- There are to few courses to choose from. If you"re interested in geotechnics, there are basically only two courses (30 credits) to chose from. How are you supposed to get a job as a geotechnic if you don"t have enough eduaction. The same for traffic and infrastructure. There needs to be many more courses to chose so you as a student can decide which focus you should have on your masters programme. Now the programme is to wide, you learn little about a lot of things. » (Yes)
- Political views and system structure on large scale, both technical but also management wise» (Yes)
- More courses that focus on windproduction, solar, electric cars etc.» (Yes)
- Quality etc management in service/health care» (Yes)
- More electric machine design.» (Yes)
- Some financial calcualtions» (Yes)
- Well, a lot more choives as stated before. » (Yes)
- I want more focus on practical courses with actual software development. » (Yes)
- Plant dynamics in nuclear power plants. » (Yes)
- Sales, pedagogy» (Yes)
- Some extra course in economics of projects could be interesting as an option course.» (Yes)
- A internship/more practical courses » (Yes)
- Marketing» (Yes)
- Excel knowledge» (Yes)
- Well, in some reading periods (lp1, lp3) there are not many courses at this master program to choose from. Even though I take all the semi-mandatory courses at the program and more, there are still some gaps where I cannot find a design course to take here. So I had to look for courses at other programs and universities. Turned out I took two courses at Interaction Design and Technologies. It would be nice to have some sort of course about "introduction to interaction design" where you get an understanding for what is included in that area of design, since many students haven"t worked with that specifically before. Also, it would be awesome with an advanced course in Sustainable design. A course in biomimicry would also be super-interesting! And, a course in designing for children would be very giving I think. » (Yes)
- Short introductory or advanced courses on connected subjects. Ecology, energy systems, politics, theory of restorations. Possibly in collaboration with GU where many such courses exist already. » (Yes)
- There must be definately something done on the semi-compulsories and compulsories. I do not see any point in HVAC if you have no special interest in this topic!» (Yes)
- Algorithms. I read this course and I actually think it has a lot that is very worth to anyone graduating with any Master in the computer science area.» (Yes)
- A course for project design, a course for managing stakeholders» (Yes)
- Medical materials, medical physics, biological physics» (Yes)
- Computational electromagnetics» (Yes)
- more practical application of theoretical tools. studyvisits!» (Yes)
- I really enjoyed the Sustainable energy futures and the Energy systems modeling and planing course. I would really like to see a more advanced modeling making course.» (Yes)
- More calculation-based courses. Perhaps given from Applied Mathematics or the IT-department.» (Yes)
- I would like more of Industry automation» (Yes)
- Economy - Sustainability and the society on a individual level. Understanding of the industry and ways to create affordable architecture.» (Yes)
- More corporate entrepreneurship and corporate organization courses and less law related courses» (Yes)
- Technical coureses that can give a qualified job» (Yes)
- Energy storage» (Yes)
- Maritime Logistics» (Yes)
- Biomaterials» (Yes)
- någon kurs om interface design eftersom många kommer att jobba med detta i vissusträckning och det finns många som inte ens vet vad ett interface (gränssnitt) är.» (Yes)
- More infrastructure» (Yes)
- something relate with purchasing and/or logistics » (Yes)
- Decision making under uncertainty» (Yes)
- Hybrid vehicle. How to innovate new energy sources.» (Yes)
- Clinical engineering» (Yes)
- Data analysis for optimizing logistic flows.Modelling of flows. Big data analysis» (Yes)
- Introduction to Complex Adaptive Systems, a course modeled on Santa Fe"s introductory course on CAS. A course in Computational Neuroscience - This is a great field that is already high impact!» (Yes)
- Leadership» (Yes)
- A dedicated course on Power System Protection» (Yes)
- More economics» (Yes)
- Combustion engineering» (Yes)
- Matlab introduction course and crash course on acoustics » (Yes)
- Kognition» (Yes)
- basic programming using Matlab/ C/ Java advanced Matlab programming (giving more knowledge on the built in functions) Introduction to Agilent advanced design system (focusing on providing practical experience on designing microwave circuits using ADS. It"s actually for the MPWPS) » (Yes)
- Anything that has to do other than physics. Maybe something closer to Computer science and systems» (Yes)
- Law, Contracts, business law etc» (Yes)
- 3d studio max, grasshopper» (Yes)
- Building Physics, or the Building Process. More towards how to build sustainable and not only HVAC» (Yes)
- I would prefer more technical Courses, there are many Courses which are similar to the course sustainable futures» (Yes)
- Possibility to take some more control related couses» (Yes)
- Structural dynamics FOR only civil engineers» (Yes)
- More Practially adapted courses that sums up the theory that you learned, about for example energy efficiency implementation measures, windpark planning, or planning of biogas powerplants. Maybe with a more technoeconomical perspektive, a kind of case/project course. » (Yes)
- Chemistry courses as semicumpulsory» (Yes)
- Quality assurance system» (Yes)
- More about management» (Yes)
- More courses for traffic planning and engineering.» (Yes)
- More about bridges. » (Yes)
- Marketing for the managent direction» (Yes)
- Corporate finance» (Yes)
- Sketching» (Yes)
- Machine Learning. "Track courses": E.g. machine learning and AI track, physics track, social systems track etc.» (Yes)
- Courses within earthquake engineering, seismic design, courses for Matlab (for engineering purposes).» (Yes)
- We haven"t learned anything about designing circuits. For instance, how do you protected the input pin of a microprocessor from high voltages? No clue. Signal processing would be nice to have.» (Yes)
- A decent basic Vehicle dynamics course» (Yes)
- Some more statistics and computeral tools» (Yes)
- More geology and traffic courses» (Yes)
- Course in structural design on master level. Computational design - similar to the "material and detail" course but with a more flexible project and more focus on architecture. » (Yes)
- Mer besök på företag» (Yes)
- real electronic engeneering courses. Not just vhdl crap. Go out in the industry and count the number of embedded C programmers and VHDL programmers and se what you find, yet you only teach fpga/vhdl and no µControllers and C.» (Yes)
- a course about power system reliability.» (Yes)
- Presentation to a crowd of non-engineers» (Yes)
- Environmental law and environmental communication.» (Yes)
- Responsive design (or more generally how to create designs for the multitude of devices, screen sizes and input devices that are out there)» (Yes)
- Complex Network Theory» (Yes)
- courses based on testing modules, hardware part of networking» (Yes)
- Large strain theory, » (Yes)
- Bridge engineering, more CAD» (Yes)
- A course on Analytical Mechanics would be great! Besides that, the program could benefit from having a track of courses a bit more directed towards Condensed Matter Theory. Maybe then one could add advanced courses in Many Body Theory (there are such courses already, on the Phd level).» (Yes)
- nano technologies, healthcare management we should be able to pick biomaterials the first year» (Yes)
- A number of smaller design assigments throughout the curriculum» (Yes)
- More coarses in programming as it will be of value out in the industry.» (Yes)
- More embedded systems.» (Yes)
- software real life project (rural studio style)» (Yes)
- Microscopy course» (Yes)
- More courses on management and governance in the infrastructure sector. Possibility to study some useful courses at architectural master program» (Yes)
- A course in the area of digital signal processing.» (Yes)
- Separera på marinepropulsion kursen. Hydrodynamic & maskin » (Yes)
- Applied optical spectroscopy» (Yes)
- I would like to have a broader range of elective courses. Some good additions would be a BIM-learning course with workshops, Construction Law, Sustainable Construction Management, etc.» (Yes)
- More environmental focus in all courses. It is a shame how far behind some of the structural engineering courses are in that field.» (Yes)
- More computational physics courses. Perhaps a few courses from MPCAS» (Yes)
- Course on the classification societiesbutin english» (Yes)
- Would make CFD mandatory the first year» (Yes)
- More Indrustry oriented courses, like System Verilog etc. » (Yes)
- Machine safety and mandetory automation course with much practical moments.» (Yes)
- Bridge design. Design of off shore strucutres» (Yes)
- There are a number of things you could change and add into the programme, but the one course that would have the biggest impact is to have the "Creating New Business" course offered at the MEI-programme. It is way more relevant and suitable for this programme than any other course that is actually within the programme.. » (Yes)
- More industrial design-based courses like e.g. surface modelling and sketching» (Yes)
- Nuclear materials should be mandatory.» (Yes)
- More courses about the renewable technologies not as much focus on the economics.» (Yes)
- Marketing management and project management (As mandatory although I know they are free electives)» (Yes)
- Signal processing» (Yes)
- Numerical technique and matlab» (Yes)
- Teach us c++ please.» (Yes)
- More Math Finance courses. Less mandatory courses» (Yes)
- Programming Courses» (Yes)
- Web programming, it feels like it could be very handy to know some web programming as a ux designer» (Yes)
- Project-Oriented courses should be designed.» (Yes)
- Power System Protection» (Yes)
- Optimization theory.» (Yes)
- A course in Scientific reasoning and Empiric evaluation.» (Yes)
- Another course to support the initial purchasing course. Personal opinion» (Yes)
- Building physics modelling such as IDA» (Yes)
- Design, creative thinking and prototyping, sustainable innovating, more about society and bigger issues concerning the world. The course feels a bit insular, living in its own little world and in Sweden. » (Yes)
- Some course in immunology would be really good and also one in cancerbiology that can be optional.» (Yes)
- More chemistry less engineering» (Yes)
- Electric vehicle design» (Yes)
- Maybe an advanced course in databases (current database structures used) and definitely more logic and/or algebra oriented courses (Category Theory is very relevant nowadays and is also becoming so in computer science, for example).» (Yes)
- More composite structures. Both structures made from more than one material, i.e concrete/steel compisite bridges in addition to composite materials (like FRP).» (Yes)
- Graphical design» (Yes)
- Operating systems» (Yes)
- BIM programme course, Bridge Engineering, Cold formed steel structures(thin-walled), Material mechanics, Fatigue and fracture, Fem solids» (Yes)
- more control theory» (Yes)
- basic Matlab for international students» (Yes)
- FEM Finite Element» (Yes)
- More subjects related to Financial Management and Economics» (Yes)
- ways of working with clients» (Yes)
- design related courses. work in a different scale. » (Yes)
- Detailing of joints and structural elements. Bridge design. Advanced computer tools (parametric tools and FEM)» (Yes)
- More economy and leadership» (Yes)
- interior design, light and colour» (Yes)
- more electable- mandatory courses to choose from» (Yes)
- Nothing to add but the mechatronics part needs improvement » (Yes)
- I would like to turn more courses into being semi-compulsory. I think there is too few today. FOr example Environmental Policy Instruments.» (Yes)
- Battery storage, Smart Grid» (Yes)
- it"s good to add More nanotechnology courses.» (Yes)
- Maybe a coure about electric machine design.» (Yes)
- Offshore structures, Bridge engineering» (Yes)
- More about civil law, according to what challenges managers will face and need to manage. » (Yes)
- Construction of bridges» (Yes)
- Technique for processing academic texts and writing» (Yes)
- material , product design» (Yes)
- Molecular Modelling, more Math, as an option. I would also enjoy something like "Advanced Microbiology".» (Yes)
- Maybe some material courses to understand the use of them in energy systems» (Yes)
- Something with web design or coding in order to create plataforms of business. » (Yes)
- Mer ledarskap och tydligare projektledarkurser. Allmänt känns kurserna flummiga.» (Yes)
- Aerodynamics of vehicle» (Yes)
- Make Design of industrial energy equipment "obligatoriskt valbar". » (Yes)
- Analytical mechanics, differential geometry/measure theory relevant for physicists, advanced statistical methods in particle physics and renormalization in QFT.» (Yes)
- Solid mechanics » (Yes)
- I was satisfied with all my chosen courses.» (No)
- I would add some more courses to the semicompulsory group, e.g. Quantum Physics and Computational Materials Physics» (No)
- there is room for courses of choice also from other programmes in the curriculum if you plan well ahead with the compulsory elective courses» (No)
- Just improve the current courses» (No)
- But I would like the courses to be better connected and form more of a unit. Too often prerequisites are not taken for granted or are absent with the consequence that the level is set too low or too many details are left out and the course is just a popular science class.» (No)
- Its good with general courses and branching into specific fields» (No)
- There is no comments box to goals and goal fulfilment so I write my comments here. I know I have read the aims before applying and on the introduction on the first day. I can not, however, find them through the link provided in the questionnaire. I found this and guess that could what is meant by the goal of the programme. https://www.chalmers.se/en/education/programmes/masters-info/Pages/Supply-Chain-Management.aspx I have answered as if this was the correct homepage.» (No)
- SHould not be compulsory - but recommended to take som course in algorithms.» (No)
- The subjects are good - on paper it"s an awesome masters program but the execution is really bad. The teachers don"t seem used to be teaching which would be fine if they are really knowledgeable. But so far the impressions of especially the teachers in Software Architecture and Agile development processes don"t seem to really know their subjects. » (No)
- 1) Make the courses more quantitative 2) Case discussions during the lectures should be an integral part of the course (e.g. a specific HBR etc. case should be assigned to every lecture that is discussed by the class) » (No)
- Can"t think of any right now.» (No)
- De kurser som skulle vara bra att läsa erbjuds som valbara kurser så nej egentligen inte » (No)
- There are probably many, but I can"t think of any at the moment. » (No)
- No comments» (No)
- This program includes very big area Wireless,photonics and space engineering I think it is like bachelor, because it is not that much narrow line toward one of this like other MP"s!» (No)
- It is enough to be able to take the elective course outside the program, if wanted.» (No)
- It was a few semi-optional courses, there would have been nice if some more was semi-otional and so you have more to choose from» (No)
- But maybe do something about the project course in LP1-LP2 for the second year, split it up or something like that» (No)
- Subjects related to Simulation should be made mandatory.» (No)
- Going more deep into the existing subjects would be more helpful for students. Some courses have topics which are just touched upon but no detailed teaching is done» (No)
- No but spread out the courses more. Many of the interesting ones are during the spring» (No)

27. Are there any courses that you think should be heavily revised (or even removed) from the programme?

Yes (1 to 2)»		359		45%
Yes (3 to 4)»		50		6%
Yes more than 5»		9		1%
No»		372		47%

Genomsnitt: 2.49

- There should be more compulsory elective courses to select from otherwise you can be very limited in your choice for the remaining courses - at the moment the coureses are very different so for students focussing or different aspects there will always be courses in that spectrum of only 6 courses that are not too useful/interesting for them» (?)
- Model predictive control, It was by far the hardest course I"ve ever read. » (?)
- BOM065 Materials performance och BOM145 Heat and moisture engineering bör ha mindre fokus på betong» (?)
- Nuclear chemistry» (?)
- Introduction to communication engineering, Satellite positioning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Programming language technology and logic in computer science. Both of them should belong to the bachelor-programme» (Yes (1 to 2))
- computer security had quite a lot of problems, mostly due to poor organization of labs and incoherent lectures» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction Governance should be removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction Governance Change Strategic Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The elective course "Nanomaterials chemistry" was, in my opinion, at a level too low for a MP. Many students in the course were chemistry masters students and yet the course content was more suited to a bachelor level course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Product planning and needs mapping, Computer aided design, very old theory, not relevant anymore. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Complex systems seminar. Det är en intresseväckande kurs som inte väcker intresse. Det blir tråkigt att lyssna på 70 elevers föredrag efter ett tag. Även Simulation of Complex systems kan behövas tittas över.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- A lot of courses go into eachother so after a while they are very similar» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Tabletop Computing, Methods of Interaction Analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and Problem Solving in Civil Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- less tangible and design for weird screens, more focus on what a design master within IT focus should be about. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks contains too much repetition of the topics in Computer Communication (EDA343).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronics Design needs to be improved!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Porgramming paradigms Models of Computation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Food biotechnology, unclear goals with poor teaching and do not give any advanced knowledge.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Need a review of the contents of the courses to avoid repetition and maybe introduce a new subject instead. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t think Heating Ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering should be mandatory but instead make it semi-compulsory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- systems biology, when there are 200 slides to one lecture you are bound to not understand all of them properly. Plus the problem with matlab! Industrial biotech. a good course, BUT the problem with Matlab for people with no previous experiences makes this course hard to pass. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Don"t need computational biology 1 and 2. And it doesn"t have to be compulsory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Virtual production planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Plasma Physics -> harder exam.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- LBT431_FinancialManagement Because only the name indicate financial not the contains!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- MTT046 - Metal processing: Casting, forming & joining! Its a joke of a course. The idea is good but the execution was horrible.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The introduction course could be 7,5 credit instead of 15.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental Aspects of Transport» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "freight transport systems", management of physical distribution" and "environmental aspects on logistic and transportation" are in many cases very overlapping. I have even seen the exactly same slides in some of the courses. I know that "management of physical distribution" and "environmental aspects on logistic and transportation" not are mandatory, however they are the only semi-mandatory courses in the spring semester, which then forces those who want to study abroad to take those courses. I also think that reading 3 courses during the first semester made the work load very high. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Networks. Advance topics in computer systems and networks.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Aided Engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Distributed systems II Operating systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IAR059 Project - Scientific Theory & Engineering Methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC should not be compulsory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Creating new business» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I looked forward to reading Active Microwave Circuits ever since I took the course Högfrekvensteknik with Vincent in my BP. Active Microwave Circuits turned out to be a nightmare administratively and Dan Kuylenstierna does not listen enough to the students, the lack of communication makes the workload huge. It would be easier to complete tasks if they actually communicated what the tasks were. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Ordinära differentialekvationer och matematisk modellering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Genetically engineered foods- i think this couse could give more. it was a bit lazy. I would have liked more in-depth focus on the molecular biology parts of how to create GM foods and a more complex view on problems that can arise etc. Systems biology (2012) was also a couse that could have given more. It was unstructured and a lot of things didn"t seem very relevant... It"s a very intresting subject so I guess that it could have been done in a different way because now it felt unecessary and boring...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- the LCA course is a pure repeat of the Environmental Systems Analysis course The applied Industrial Ecology course is useless, as it is a repeat of the Environmental Systems Analysis course. these two courses should be a continuation of the Environmental Systems Analysis course, and thus should be only for the students who followed Environmental Systems Analysis course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat & Moisture Engineering and Material Performance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- -The courses during the first semester overlap at some points (Chemistry vs Physics courses).» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I do not believe that there should be compulsory courses. The system with semi-compulsory courses is enough to ensure that students stay within the framework of the program.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and simulation.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanotechnology for sustainable energy is not a very good course, and the content that is interesting is maily covered by surface and nano physics together with energy related materials.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Product planning and needs mapping» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanomaterials chemistry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software evolution project is so badly organized that it should be removed altogether. I honestly don"t think anyone learned anything valuable in the long term from that course. Replace it with 2 project courses focusing on web development, web services, mobile applications, something more relevant.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- SSY190, Model predictive control» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The seminarie-course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- EHealth, no clear structure to lectures, many guest lectures with similar content that overlap. Could contain much more content if guest lectures were coordinated better. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I can"t remember much in detail, but I think the course "Heat and moisture engineering" could"ve been improved in certain aspects. The parallel course, "FEM Basics" was, however, very time consuming, and consequently taking more than half of the workload.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The intro courses were to easy and » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course Sustainable development is now very non-consistent with teachers and their goals for the students to reach.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- IAR059 has so far (halfway done) been very confusing. Doesn"t feel like it"s ready.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human centered design course needs complete redoing» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I only had problems with the Machine learning course so far, but it"s hard for me to say if it was the teaching or just myself, I had some trouble in general at that time and wasn"t able to give 100% » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Embedded control systems - it should decide what it"s focus is» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The competition course should be electable and not mandatory. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think the Operating Systems course is good, but it is a bit to simple for master studies. We should have gone deeper and and done some more advanced stuff. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic, Programming Language Technology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic for computer scientists, due to studies abroad I took this course after most of my studies and looking back it did not seem useful enough to be mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modern imaging is a bit to easy» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I think it sometimes was bad that we had three courses in the same quarter.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and simulation. Also, the Image Analysis course might be replaced by the Image Processing course, as the former is a follow-up course to the later. At least it should be done in a way so that the student is given an opportunity to take the courses in that order.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- CFD, En kurs med omotiverad examinator, ouppdaterat/ofullständigt kursmaterial och till vis del fel fokus på inlämningsuppgifter. Finns potential men bör göras om i grunden. Kursen fick mig att helt tappa intresset för Fluid inriktningen trots att jag efter både Strömningsmekanik och Fluid Mechanics var mycket intresserad att gå det spåret.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- nanofabrication lab should leave to the students more room to work, not just follow the supervisor» (Yes (1 to 2))
- systems biology is really bad. it is embarrising when paying students are upset about having to pay for this course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine Propulsion Systems SJO740, this course was totally unorganized, the correction of exams and presentations felt like a lottery and the teachers were lacking of commitment to help the students. Also a lot of time were spent on things that didn"t contribute to further learning but was only time consuming and took attention away from a lot of the interesting parts of the course. This course can not be kept as it is and it should not be held with the Bachelor level engineers either. Thanks to this course the whole study period suffered due to a to high workload.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- biorefinery, it a course with great potential but it cant be this focused on wood » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Organizational Project Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- It seems like the courses are pretty okay but there is no clear aim at what the food track aims at, now i feel it is for reseacher and people that want to work in industry. Would be nice if there could be distinguised into a more preparative industrial courses. Or infromation about courses that could be good to take outside the track to fulfill these. Like "reglerteknik", separation techniques, LEAN» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design for social inclusion» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Algorithms for Machine Learning: the lectures are not good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and Problem Solving for Engineering. Less water courses. In general, more alternative courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "antenna engineering" is good but might benefit from being just a little bit less research-oriented. In comparison with similar courses in other universities, the course leaves out some important "standard" concepts in favor of current research done at Chalmers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving in engineering - or at least improve the course! The traffic courses (teknisk samhällsplanering, urban traffic planning, road engineering) have too similar content! We do the same things in all of them with just some varying content. The same with drinking water engineeringt - we already know everything from the bachelor (it is however a very intreseting subject but we would lika to learn it in a deeper way than in the bachelor)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC and CFD» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design Management Bom Knowledge and Learning Bom090» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design! It was a really bad course during 2013.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical inference.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The software architecture and agile development processes are good on paper but they need better teachers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Our geotechnics qourse was really really poor.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine Propulsion Systems needs to be divided in two classes. Interesting topics but too much information for one class!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Human Factors» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course water resources and environment. You learn things you already know from other courses, and it is also repeated in the other courses in the mp. I do not think that it is ok to be graded mostly depending on a group project where you are more than 6 persons in the group. Also the people attending the course have very different knowledge - for example some people did not know how to refer to sources when writing a report. It made it very hard to do the groupwork. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Theory of science» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable Development (we learn that in other courses) HVAC (or totally be changed, but I still want a course on energy in buildings within the programme)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Antenna Engineering is a joke!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Nanotechnology for sustainable energy » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Maybe not heavily revised, but a little.. Finite Element Basic: The connection to the previous course Strukturmekanik (which was needed to attend MPSEB for V-students) could be explained more / made clearer in the beginning of the course. (The FEM-basics is also for the students attending Applied mechanics, but I don"t know what background they have when it comes to FEM)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Revise financial management and accounting, asap, during my bach. I studied two ec. courses that were much better structured and applied then this one» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth. Please, remove guest lecturers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Metal processing, casting forming, joining, should be heavily revised NOW!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Graphical Interfaces needs to be revised, more the organization of the course than the content.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- mechatronic design, embedded control systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Some courses are much easier if you"re from physics (compared to EE). It should be possible to make these courses more challenging for physics students, without making them to hard for EE students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical Inference MVE155» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information theory. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced analysis om den inte görs bättre » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine propulsion systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and Moisture engineering, Building Materials» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The room acoustics course should be heavily revised and the technical acoustics 2 course should be better structured and explained.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC - this course has to be revised a lot, very bad quality and mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The needs mapping course didn"t gave me much at all» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Logic in Computer Science and Software Engineering Using Formal methods were really easy. Would be too easy even if they were on a bachelor"s level. Machine Learning was very interesting, but also very difficult. I wouldn"t want to remove any content from the course, but it would be great if it was more accessible. I had difficulties keeping up with all the work, with my weak mathematical background from the bachelor"s level at Chalmers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Global sustainability Waste management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and simulation..it was really, really difficult to follow the explanations in class.. the theacher (Paolo Falcone) most repeating sentence was "you should already know this". Most of biomedical students found it hard, and we talked about it after the classes. It would be a good idea to revised the course so it is easier to catch the teacher explanations and programme speed and do more exercises to understand the theory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering could be fitted into other courses whereas this course is mainly bits and pieces from few courses put into one. The whole structure of Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering is sometimes all over the place. This course was supposed to link various courses together but over all did not.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course of Service Contract Management, that course is a little bit old fashion and not exactly give us what we expected. And the quality of the lectures have large extend to be improved. And for the course of Management of physical distribution, so many discussions with fuzzy answers. I would expect this one to be more practical with more calculation and how it has been done in real life. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Don´,t have research methodology as a mandatory course, it would be much more interesting to take another course if you already has taken similar courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Dynamical Systems is too heavy, and should not be mandatory. It would be nice to open up to more courses in like Machine learning and data mining, AI, etc. The program focuses too much on classical complex systems from ages ago. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Stochastic optimization algorithms (move to mathematics department?)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Water resources and environment wasn"t well done. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Termpaper.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Road Engineering, Urban Traffic Planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I feel there"s unrealistic expectations from many examiners and tutors within the master thesis. The pressure is too high and people feel really bad during a long period of time. One main reason is that we"re expected to make a booklet/report, presentation AND a well thought exhibition and a public presentation. Comparing to MPARC who"s "only" being judged upon the exhibition and presentation. Some of the pressure is ofcourse our own responsibility but late schedules, unclear conditions, personal opinions and large consequenses if failing is definitly making bad worse.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The experimental course in the beginning of the MP should be removed or get a serious remake. It was way below Chalmers standard.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Methods of Interaction Analysis has an interesting and important topic but fails to really get the information across in a way that is accessible and close to practice. The material (slides, papers, lectures) is very bad in transfering the core knwledge that should be taken away. It should be simplified and to the point.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Marine Propulsion, revised Hydrodynamics, revised Wave Loads and Sea keeping Revised » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Urban traffic planning, GIS, infrastructure and environmental enginnering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Don"t put obvious lectures about how to use a search engineer, for example, step 2: enter keywords, completely unnecssary» (Yes (1 to 2))
- More fluency to the Urban Metabolism course, also, it has good content but some repetitive information » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Games and Learning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project development course, but it has already been revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The cumpolsory modelling course in the first study period. I donät know why that is included in the program at all, non the less why that is a compulsory course. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Clearing ner buisness borde göras om helt och anpassas till resten av programmet. I dagens läge skulle den eventuellt fungera som en valbarkurs » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Electrical Power Systems, Model and Planning» (Yes (1 to 2))
- HVAC» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea evaluation » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The exam in integrated prod dev. should not be a test in memorizing lists, it however had a good view on group work (only giving bonus poins. I don"t think group work should be graded in any course, instead raise the level for pass.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Design for Quality» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced Software Architecture: Very theoretical. Most of the things we learned should not be considered advanced and is more like common knowledge. The project from this course was really bad. The exam was very easy. Model-driven engineering: This subject is very narrow and is not used widely in the industry as far as I know. Is it necessary to have as a mandatory course? Would have been really nice for me to be able to pick something else.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The first nuclear chemistry course in study period 1.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Strategic Management (better organized) and Construction Governance» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture engineering should be revised considerably» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modern Imaging and Spectroscopic methods. Condensed Matter Physics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Research methodology, unfortunatley the teacher was very bad at teaching. I am sure he know a lot about the subject and he is very nice, but he is a sleeping pill which resulted in that almost all of the class studied at home alone instead of going to the lessons. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- More advanced compiler course, PLT and Compiler Construction should be restructured in general. I think more could be achieved if there were a Compilers 1 and a Compilers 2.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The courses that needs to be heavily revised or removed, from worst to less worse. 1. "DAT146 Advanced topics in computer systems and networks" This course was REALLY messy. No one really understood what we were to do in it, until it was some week until the final paper would be handed in. I think the purpose of the course is good, to learn to write. But its really bad to have a "first come, first served" on the topics, as some topics are generally much more fun than others. The general impression of the course as it was now, is that it was very bad 7.5hp spent for me. I didn"t learn anything, nor did anyone else I know. It was only frustrating to read this couese. I would have prefered to read some other course than this one, so I think it either needs to be heavily revised, or simple removed. 2. "TDA297 Distributed systems, advanced course" The main problem in this course is the teacher. He doesn"t teach in a very good way. It"s hard to understand what he talks about, even when reading up in advance. 3. "EDA387 Computer networks" This course needs to be heavily revies. When I read it (in 2012) it felt like it was three courses in one, that really wasn"t that related to each other. * The part Ali Sahleson had felt mostly like a refresh of what we read in the bachelor computer networks course. Nothing really new here. * The network programming part. This was fun, but too much were given in the lab, so the difficulty were way to low on the labs. * The self-methods part. I have no idea WHY this part was in the course at all. The subject doesn"t belong to the course, the book suggested for this was hard to read and practically impossible to follow, and worst of all, Elad just couldn"t teach this subject at all. This whole part was just very fuzzy and I didn"t understand much. Even though this, I nailed some of the self-methods questions on the exam. That"s just weird.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial Management (to be revised), Organizational Management (to be revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Space science and techniques should be semi compulsive and not compulsive» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software architecture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heating, ventilation and air control systems engineering should not be compulsory. And sustainable electric power systems should be heavily revised as it doesn"t fit with the rest of the courses. Learning the calculations on electric power grids is not necessary for the program. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- urban and architectural design. the professors can decide weather to work with their swedish students or go to brazil...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TBE during the fall really missed its purpose since it failed to test us of relevant knowledge and since it took up so little time for being a 15 hp course (this is probably the fault of the other two courses during the same time taking too much time for being 7,5 hp courses). 50% of the points in the TBE course came from the last assignment which was a 4 page long home assignment where you got very broadly defined questions in combination with absolutely no room for interpretation or space to explain your thoughts. Much of the course points on the other assignments were given out for ability to reflect on learnings during the fall - a skill that isn"t taught or even discussed during the course and a skill that many engineers have practiced during 3 years to forget in order to write academic papers. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Customer relationship management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Customer Relationshps» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Need for revision: Methods of Interaction Analysis, Human-Centered Design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Life Cycle Assessment - katastrofal kurs med ett hopkok av lärare som ibland pratar bristfälligengelska, använder samma terminologi men för olika saker och sedan har frågor på tentan där huvudrubrikerna är lärarens namn som har just gjort frågorna till den delen av tentan. DÅ gäller det att komma ihåg vilken lärare som använder sig av vilken terminologi och för vad annars blir det fel. Bara det att de har sina namn som skiljeväggar mellan tentans olika delar är ju allarmerande. Bortsett från det är det i bland stora delar av text som rent av skulle memoreras. De verkar desutom rätta lite som de själv vill. vi var ett gängen som varat samma sak på ett antal uppgifter men bara häldften av oss fick rätt. Underligt. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in experimental physics. For many people attending the program who plan to specialize in theory or numerical computation, an additional course in experimental physics seems like no more than a time consuming burden, time that could have been much better spent elsewhere, especially considering that everyone from the bachelor program in engineering physics have already taken two more courses in experimental physics and those should be sufficient for people who are not planning to go into an experimental area. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Physics of nuclear reactors should not be mandatory (or heavily revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geotechnics should be improved with new lecturers.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Statistical inference» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Numerical linear algebra was rather close to a disaster.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Let Olaf take care of both Distributed courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- For my part the Course in ODE and mathematical modeling (which is mandatory) seems unnescessary for the profile track ive chosen (computations) and I dont think it adds so much that i couldnot have chosen another course. Same thing probably goes for the PDE course. I understand why they are there, i just don"t think they need to be mandatory.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Environmental aspects on logistic and transportation. Repeating previous knowledge.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Introduction to Communication Engineering. Do not go trough theory so fast. Let the basic concepts sink in during lectures. The rest can be studied by the student on his/hers free time. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power Electronic Converters - Work Load and lecturers/tutors Industrial Management - General Structure» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software Evolution Project - revise Model Driven Engineering - remove (or at least don"t make it mandatory)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Engineering geology which is a mandatory course should be structured so that also the environmental engineering field and not only the civil engineering field will be included in the curricula.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Sustainable electric power systems Life cycle assesment» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea Evaluation Organizational Behaviour (partially) Technology Based Entrepreneurship (partially)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Room Acoustics should have more assignments before the competition» (Yes (1 to 2))
- EME102 active microwave circuits The project for this course should have a more clear instruction on how to use ads and on what we are supposed to do, i.e. specify the goal more clearly. The job for the TA on the tutorial should also be defined more clearly. The solution for the tutorial problems should be written no matter by hand or printed and uploaded to Pingpong so that everyone can see it. Furthermore the textbook should be changed. I would suggest Microwave Transistor Amplifiers: Analysis and Design (2nd Edition)by Gonzalez. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- As mentioned above sustainable futures, modelling and planning and sustainable development are too similar» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed Matter Physics should continue more from what we learned in Solid state physics in the Bachelor Program, Non-equilibrium should also communicate better with other courses.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The Image courses are not to useful for someone that does not want to work with imaging. Biomedical instrumentation was a quite bad course. The hand ins were really unstructured and involved a lot of guessing. It just didn"t seem like a very good course in general.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- ENM045 Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering - I think a increadibly useful course when it would have had a red thread. Clear goals of what to learn and calculation excercises. The teacher also take the critic personally, and didn"t want to adapt to requests. The co-teacher was very difficult to hear. IT SHOULD BE HEAVILY REVISED.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- remove the HVAC!» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Models of Computation (TDA183)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Biorefinery should not be one of the mandatory courses. Course page is also missing for this course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- strategy creation and process change» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Need immediate improvement in the Geotechnics course, need a better lecturer. It is really hard to follow the relevance of the parts in the course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TEK290 Research methodology» (Yes (1 to 2))
- safety and Riskanalsysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Viritual production course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computational Biology 1 and Dynamical Systems - overlapping material! Simulation of Complex Systems - discussion of practices for modelling, more theory and discussions! Complex System Seminars course - More "seminary" - put CAS in a context - tie the program together» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model-based engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t like the statistics course. Can we have one about signal processing instead?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle dynamics is not well imparted course. Vehicle and traffic safety is not really a challenging course. Road vehicle aerodynamics could dive a little deeper into CFD simulations» (Yes (1 to 2))
- project psychology. To much pure project courses and simply to unspecified course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Kursen "term paper and seminars" var alldeles för omfattande för de poäng som den gav. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- risk management should be revised» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Skip MTS, I know you dont decide but still, scrap that. alse my previous awnsers covers this question aswell.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- virtual process planning design of flexible and modular automation systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change, or at least change professor from Sten Karlsson.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Science of environmental change. I think the course need some pedagogical input. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Image Analysis» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Financial management. The subject is good not the course did not teach me much. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- mtt046 severely needed reorganizing. mtt081 had some good content but could be split to incorporate the material science part in other courses and make a stand alone course in IPM. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Advanced topics in computer system and networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The ICC course should be removed. Research Methods course will need to be little bit more practicable with the statistics aspect.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Idea Evaluation » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering is a horrible course.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Building materials Heat and moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I would like Experimental Physics: Spectroscopic Methods to be improved upon. The course is necessary and very important for physicists in general (it is even strange that the Applied Physics program does not have this in the program, as it should even be compulsory there!). However, the course this year suffered from major administrative issues and should be looked over. It might be better for the course if it gets a more engaged examiner.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structural design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Structural Dynamics, better cooperation between the examiner and the assistants.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Information Theory should not be compulsory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving » (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1. Distributed systems, advanced course 2. Advanced topics in computer systems and networks» (Yes (1 to 2))
- i think condensed matter physics could be made somewhat more accessible to the students.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed matter physics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- I don"t really see why the HVAC-course is compulsory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Six sigma black belt, needs to be reorganized» (Yes (1 to 2))
- 1) Design Management (revised) 2) Environmental Management (revised)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Model Based Testing, Software evolution project» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Quality management, risk management and safety» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Complex systems seninars» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Economics of Innovation Creating New Business» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Flexible and modular automation was a joke. Virtule process planning was of extreamly poor quality as well.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Geotechnics. There should be more structure in the course. The learining outcomes should be clear and used in the teaching. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronics was advertised differently to what it actually was (it was very control engineering-based vs. the holistic view of mechatronical systems, which I thought I had signed up for)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course "Physics of reactors" should be heavily revised, it is far too theoretical and mathematical. The course "Nuclear chemistry" is really great, but the workload does not match the credits given for it, the double would be more accurate. Also, the examination of the course needs to be revised, it does not asses the learning from the course, this is shown by the large extent of highly motivated students still failing it. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The CFD for engineers should be named CFD for chemical engineers. There is nothing in the description of the course that says that it will only be focusing on simulation of chemical reaction. The big project in the course was not suppose to focus on explaining the CFD part of the project, you should focus on explaining what Selective catalytic rector is.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Software evolution project» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Mechatronic design» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heating Ventillation and Air Conditioning Systems, Sustainable Electric Power Systems» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Computer Graphics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- eHealth» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Didn"t find "stochastic calculus", "foundations of probability theory" or "statistical inference" very good.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- idea evaluation, restructure the lectures. They were terrible » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Tabletop Computing, the course should stay but needs to be revised with a lot more resources. It wasn"t good this year, to little information and student to teacher contact...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power Electronic Devices and Applications Power System Operation (has a lot of information, some can be made into another course)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- VPP - Virtual Process Production» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The six sigma course could be removed or altered to grant the students green belt. A black belt should be able to take on a heavyweight team leader role, something multiple years of working experience are needed for. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed matter physics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Condensed matter physics » (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project Design and Management» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Not because of unimportance but bad courses. Geotechnics Maybe even Materials Performance (too easy exam, and too much to do during the course, feelt like I didn"t learn anything) Heat and Moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering course should be changed or removed.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Organizational Behaviour is not mandatory course, but it is now little bit off for what we need. Too theoretical and basic. Should have less academic reading/lecturing and more simulations and lab cases as on other courses. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- I do not really see the benefits of the course "term paper"» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Construction governance - everything about this course should be revised, the content, the lecturer, the exam Project Management - the content is to general, you"ve heard it all before in the Bachelor and it is very similar to Managing organisations in the construction industry» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Vehicle and Traffic Safety and Impact Biomechanics share too much in common.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Problems for the peofessors with the language» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Modeling and Simulation» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Wastewater, there are group assignment, individual assignment as well as exam. Too much work » (Yes (1 to 2))
- heat and moisture» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat and moisture and Materials performance are not good. I reckon they could be removed to make room for better courses like detailing or bridge construction, or make Advanced building physics mandatory instead of Heat and moisture. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- The course in condensed matter theory doesn"t really work as it is now.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- "Tailored materials" should get a new teacher...» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Term paper OPC» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Medical Physics» (Yes (1 to 2))
- THe HVAC course was not so well structured. The teachers are nice and could be very good if better prepared.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Power System Operation can be made better» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Project Psychology should not be mandatory» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Heat & Moisture engineering» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The first course should be removed "Governance" where the goal was unclear and where student last lecture ask about the definition of Governance. That question is an evidence of that course failure. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- ENM045 needs major revision to be useful for this program, and as well ENM125 to be a useful semi-compulsory course» (Yes (1 to 2))
- For me, the course in Surface and nano physics didn"t add anything to my tool box. Difficult, hardly anyone were able to really follow the course but all still got a fairly high grade I think.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Första terminen var de flesta kurserna extremt lika varandra. Governance kan strykas, slå ihop project management och project management in org. till en och spetsa till constract-kursen rejält. » (Yes (1 to 2))
- All hydrodynamics related subjects need to be revised.» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Protein engineering, Etiska och sociala frågor kring genetik och bioteknik (MTS)» (Yes (1 to 2))
- The purpose of the course in electrodynamics eludes me as it primary goal seems to be a rehearsal of the previous bachelor level course together with some solution techniques acquired from the course in Fourier analysis, also bachelor level. In addition, why is there a mandatory course in experimental physics, given that it resembles the one at bachelor level in most aspects?» (Yes (1 to 2))
- Product Planning and Needs Mapping Product Development Project» (Yes (1 to 2))
- TIF155, FFR110, FFR135» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Modelling and problem solving in civil engineering » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Operations Strategy can be removed - Not very engaging material and lectures - Lack of prerequisite knowledge about Operations management Better to have a real strategy course and have a more thorough Operations management course. Introduction to Quality and Operations management should be removed. - Mostly repetition for I-students - Could be 7,5hp - Low quality case work given short time and new students that might be unfamiliar with case work - It is an easy course and sets the bar too low, it would be better to have a challenging first course The Six Sigma course is perceived as unstructured, the subject is a good fit with the Quality and Operations Management master though so it should remain.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Many courses go through the same things as both studied on the bachelor courses and on other MP courses.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Structural dynamics shouldn"t be mandatory. Project in applied mechanics and multiphase flow have generous room för improvement. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Course: TDA297 Distributed systems, advanced course Needs to be revised. Curriculum is good and appropriate for MP, but the teaching and implementation is bad. Course: DAT146 Advanced topics in computer systems and networks Needs to be revised. Curriculum is good and appropriate for MP, but it was implemented badly. Course web page and information about the course with dead lines and tasks being very messy and hard to understand. Course: EDA387 Computer networks Had some elements (Self methods) which should be removed as they are not that related to computer networks. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Some courses, such as SEFM, or Models of computation, could go deeper into the theory. Monads could be explained completely in Introduction to Functional Programming, and start in AFP directly with Monad Transformers.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Computer Networks. Advanced course in Distributed Systems. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Design management and project management. Some others need to have higher expectations on the students. As it is now even those that do not do anything easily could pass an examination, since the teacher do not seem to care about the reputation of chalmers, they just want to minimize their own workload. They should be able to notice if there is one member in a group work that does not contributes to the group. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Not revising of the courses per se, but... All courses I want to take seem to be held in the fall term only! I had a hard time finding interesting courses for study periods 3 and 4, while for 1 and 2 I found too many.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Första halvårets kurser uppfyllde inte mina förväntningar. Engineering geology var den enda kursen som höll måttet. Drinking water var tydligen helt okej sa de som gillar vattenkurser men problemsolving var den sämsta kurs jag läst. ingen struktur. Lektionerna handlade mer om att skryta om doktorsavhandlingar än om att lära ut något vettigt. Hoppas att det går att göra något åt detta. Efter det halvåret så kan man ju välja kurser själv så då får man välja 1 kurs nästan varje läsperiod som är utanför programmet och till och med på andra skolor för att man ska få ihop 2 vettiga kurser samma läsperiod.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Product development, operations management and research methodology could be revised and more integrated. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Revised: Urban traffic planning, geotechnics Removed or have anotehr option: All water courses, the modelling course» (Yes (3 to 4))
- All courses except FEM in the first half year.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Urban metabolism, Risk assessment and decision support, Urban traffic planing » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Energy related materials (Quizzes are too demanding), Condensed matter physics (Lecturer is difficult to understand), Physics of electromagnetic materials (Oral exams should be taken with open books and notes), Soft matter physics (Grading should not be limited to final written exams and few problems - which count almost nothing to the total grade) » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Some of the elective courses could be revised such as Management of Physical Distribution Systems. » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Visual Brand Identity IDE project » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Advanced form design 1 and 2, ergonomics design for all» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Thera are a lot of mandatory corses that shuld be specific to a trac within the master. My strongest exampel is eHealth. If you are not going to work with IT it is a complete and boring waste of time.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- My program is called wireless, photonics and space engineering which is kind of scattered than other courses. I hope it can be more focused in a specific area instead.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- I think it is because all these courses are either new or recently revised: - Ergonomics, Design for all - Advanced form design 1 - Advanced form design 2 These courses need better structure, goal for outcomes and clearer guidance from the teachers. Putting the responsibility of planning and executing on the students is fine, great in fact, but the abstract nature of these courses makes it very confusing and difficult. Many times it felt like the course plan and the exercises were planned only one day ahead. Short notices, bad planning, uncontinuous communication etcetera affects the quality of the courses. Much much room for improvement! » (Yes (3 to 4))
- Freight transport system, physical distribution... and environmental aspects... could all be merged into one. The same goes for Purchasing... and Customer relationship.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Artificial Neural Networks(Made optional + revised), Computational Biology A(Made optional + revised), Dynamical Systems(Revised), Information Theory for CAS (Revised)» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems engineering (HVAC) Environmental aspects of transport Life cycle assessment» (Yes (3 to 4))
- All building technology courses. The master program Me should be for structural engineering» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Graphical Interfaces, Tangible Interaction, HCD, Methods of Interaction Analysis, » (Yes (3 to 4))
- FEM basics - make it not so much dependent on Matlab so people without knowledge in Matlab can follow it. The same applies for FEM structures and Introduction to sound and vibration and the rest of the courses which are to high extend based on Matlab.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Research methods» (Yes (3 to 4))
- modeling and simulations, applied signal processing, image analysis, e-health these courses should not be mandatory!» (Yes (3 to 4))
- The first half year, a.k.a the Business Creation Lab courses, needs to be heavily revised to maintain the quality one should expect from an leading education within entrepreneurship. It is clearly outdated, coming from a time of business plans and intellectual property protection strategies, and seems to have clearly missed that the internet and software age is here - and has totally changed the landscape of entrepreneurship.» (Yes (3 to 4))
- For passing the course should be 40% Model Driven Engineering ---> Exams are not so Easy, its full of practical oriented there should be theoretical also... Requirement Engineering ---> Theory part is so tough, in this part he should ask some simple questions Empirical Software Engineering ----> Exams are not so Easy, questions are asking outside of the course books and materials» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Surface engineering. The project is good the rest is shitty. And the exam is a joke exactly the same every year» (Yes (3 to 4))
- Knowledge and learning in POs - remove MOCI - revise strategic management - revise big time construction governance - remove» (Yes (3 to 4))
- MDE Advance Arc Agile Software Evolution Project management and quality » (Yes more than 5)
- MDE, ASA, PMQ, SEP, SPL, MBT RE (Robert Feldt), ESE (Richard Torkar) and ADP (Morgan Ericsson) were the best courses I took that were given by SE. Unfortunately, I have heard that at least 2/3 courses have lost the repsonsible since I took it. I do not know how the new responsibles are but the responsible then showed sincere interest and care in creating a good course for future students.» (Yes more than 5)
- Modern Imageing, Condensed Matter Physics, Sufrace and Nanophysics, Non-equilibrium processes and not so heavily: Computational Materials Physics and Electrodynamics.» (Yes more than 5)
- It seems that some courses always trying to re-do the same thing as some other courses. They are not all the same but their goals are almost same with each other, and that"s a little bit annoying.» (Yes more than 5)
- Remove or revisit the course Condensed matter physics (FKA091), it adds no knowledge above the course in the bachelor program (FFY011, which was good). Instead it delivers a poorly executed course that leaves you more irritated than enlighted. The lectures are crap, with bad notations, poor motivations and no red line througout the course. The courselitterature is a sad compilation of bla bla bla, with some occasional formulas. (remove Aschcroft/Mermin!) The course Modern imaging, spectroscopy and diffraction techniques (TIF030), is also a waste of time that could have been shrinked down to like 3 credits with the same amount of content. The course Surface and nanophysics (TIF120), is just plain bad with poorly coordinated lectures and lecturer that rather results in a lack of inspiration. REMOVE! Normally this wouldn"t be a problem since you could just avoid them. The problem is that they are semi compulsory which is DISSAPOINTING since they should give a better representation of the programme. Lastly, Superconductivity and low-temperature physics should have a little overhaul so it doesn"t abuse the physics wioth crappy notation and poor motivations when it is derived. I lack experience of the following courses but I believe they are rather bad: Sport Technology (TIF270), Nanotechnology for sustainable energy (TIF165). » (Yes more than 5)
- Modern Imaging: Om man har läst Teknisk Fysik så har man redan talat om elektronmikroskop i Fasta tillståndets fysik. Vad som tog en halv kurs att förklara här lyckades man göra i Fastan på mycket kortare tid. Den första halvan av kursen behandlade optiska mikroskop, vilket inte heller var något nytt. Condensed Matter Physics: Föreläsningarna gav absolut ingenting. Kursen bestod nästan uteslutande av härledningar av ekvationer (ofta slarviga och felaktiga) men gav ingen fysikalisk intuition eller förståelse. Kursen avslutades med en mycket typad tenta där samtliga frågor återanvänds. Superconductivity: Kursen misshandlade all form av fysikalisk notation och konsistens. Ge mig en kvantfysikalisk tolkning med rigorös notation. Surface- and nanophysics: Konceptet med gästföreläsare på varenda föreläsning gör att det saknas en röd tråd. Dessutom blir det mycket repetition för oss som läst Teknisk Fysik. Non-equilibrium processes: Kursens första halva behandlar främst härledningar av ekvationer men ger ingen fysikalisk förståelse. Efter halva kursen väljer man mellan två inriktningar. Det är ännu för tidigt för att jag ska kunna bedömma denna.» (Yes more than 5)
- HVAC, Nanotechnology, Sustainable energy Futures, Technical Change and environment, sustainable development too much talking about the same topics.» (Yes more than 5)
- Sustainable power production and transportation» (Yes more than 5)
- System Biology» (Yes more than 5)
- This only includes the courses I took.» (No)
- But it would be good if more courses were elective» (No)
- But change order. Research design and methods should be in the bachelor"s program som we can apply these methods and learn different methods in different courses during the 5 years» (No)
- No, but you should remove the "Software Engineering" master program *entirely*» (No)
- some courses are supported by the masters aim but are, depending on background, less available if lacking prerequisites» (No)
- I"ve thought about this since I started working on my Master"s Thesis. I feel really confident about what I"ve learned but the hardest part is putting it all into practice. One thing I feel like I would have wanted was to have more examples of where the knowledge could be used in practice in the life science field. Especially the statistics course taken in year 2. I now feel like that was the worst taught course but also a field that"s extremely important when doing any experiment at all really. More information on where and how to apply statistics in life science work would have been great!» (No)
- » (No)
- No comments» (No)
- No, keep up with continuous improvements.» (No)
- None of the compulsory courses have been irrelevant, but some electives should be heavily revised.» (No)
- The course Graphical Interfaces (TDA492) in 2012 was awful but they have fixed that now which is good!» (No)
- it"s almost ok.» (No)
- I think that my courses have been very good, but I also have avoided the courses that I think I wouldn"t like, so I can"t say that is valid for all courses within the programme» (No)

Programme administration

28. How satisfied are you with the programme administration?

805 svarande

Not at all»		16		1%
Not so satisfied»		59		7%
Neither/Nor»		133		16%
Satisfied»		403		50%
Very satisfied»		194		24%

Genomsnitt: 3.86

29. How satisfied are you with the support from the Student centre?

Not at all»		14		1%
Not so satisfied»		32		3%
Neither/Nor»		239		29%
Satisfied»		379		47%
Very satisfied»		141		17%