Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Ceramics Engineering 2014, KKE013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2014-02-13 - 2014-03-14
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 84%
Kontaktperson: Sven Karlsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 43%
Around 20 hours/week»6 37%
Around 25 hours/week»2 12%
Around 30 hours/week»1 6%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»8 50%
100%»8 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- finite element course in the same time on thursday morning. We had exercise session in the finite element course and this course was harder for me so I went to this one instead of ceramic lecture.» (75%)
- We had the Finite Element Structure course in the same time. As we had difficulties in FE, we chose to attend FE on Thursday morning.» (75%)
- around 90%» (100%)
- Missed one lecture do to overlap with other course» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

16 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 6%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 31%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»10 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- help to know what we have to learn» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

16 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 6%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 93%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.93

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

15 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 20%
Yes, definitely»6 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 18%
Large extent»9 56%
Great extent»4 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.06

- Teachers were really interesting and interested :)» (Large extent)
- Teachers knew their subject and were interesting» (Large extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»2 12%
Some extent»6 37%
Large extent»5 31%
Great extent»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.56

- Good handouts on ping pong, even enough to study without the book» (Large extent)
- The handouts on ping pong were really useful. But no other literature, I have never uses the book.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 31%
Very well»11 68%

Genomsnitt: 3.68

- Really good organisation : handouts put in time, good communication.» (Very well)
- Very good organization» (Very well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 6%
Rather good»2 12%
Very good»12 75%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.81

- Teachers were always here to answer to our questions or for helping us. It was not difficult at all to obtain help.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 6%
Rather well»2 12%
Very well»13 81%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- We met new people and they are really friendly. I really like the atmosphere because we were only 17/18 students in a new environment. We ate together so it was really nice :)» (Very well)
- It was the best course ambiance I had here in Chalmers. Because it was in a new environment and tooks place all day long (which also mean commom lunch), the help was more developed.» (Very well)

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 12%
Adequate»14 87%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.87

- Im in three courses this period so i have difficulties making a fair jugdemet» (Adequate)
- I enjoyed to have class every two weeks. This way i could review the lectures of the previous week.» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 68%
High»3 18%
Too high»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.43

- I spent a lot of time on Finite Element assignment ... (because I have never did Finite Element before..)» (Too high)
- As we couldn"t attend the basic course in Finite Element, we spent a horrible quarter working on it (assignements + lectures).» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»1 6%
Good»9 56%
Excellent»5 31%

Genomsnitt: 4.12 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I would like a second, more detailed course, as well» (Good)
- Really instructive course in our materials engineer formation, which complete our metals and polymers knowledge.s Labs were interesting, course were really instructive and teachers always here to help us. And a really good ambiance with other students.» (Excellent)
- Very adequate course in my formation of Materials Engineer. It complete the Metals and Polymers courses we had the first quarter. It gives a good overview of Ceramics materials, fabrication processes and applications.» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Lab sessions were great»
- Laboratories»
- The laboratory sessions.»
- Några av labbarna»
- The labs were fun, keep them!»
- All of the laborations»
- everything especially labs»
- One week of course every two weeks.»
- The environment at Swerea and the schedule. The course guide line is good also.»
- Labs»
- Labs are always great and should definitely be kept»
- All the labs, and lectures were good.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Schedule, but i guess that isnt possible due to non-student participants»
- Everything goes well so far»
- A bit of problem solving and interactive sessions in the classroom during lectures.»
- Det blir lite för många labbar. Kanske kan man slå ihop några. »
- Dont know.»
- Cant think of anything»
- nothing in particluar»
- I don"t know...»
- Less overlaps»
- My other course intervened with this which made me miss some lectures. I don"t think that is ok and should be looked in to.»

16. Additional comments

- svarskod: 5140168376»
- 9240168167»
- Svarskod: 0240168910»
- It was really a good course»
- No comments»
- Maybe add more specific knowledge in the design part, about what ceramic materials can we really use for an given application.»
- Thanks for a fun course»
- Overall a very good course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.12

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.12
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från