ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

LP 4 V 13 ARK141 Urban and Architectural Design, ARK141

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-12 - 2013-09-13
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 39%
Kontaktperson: Anna Sofia Wannerskog»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Arkitektur 300 hp

Personal background

1. Where did you study for your bachelor degree?

9 svarande

Sweden - Chalmers»2 22%
Sweden - another university»0 0%
University outside Sweden»7 77%
Other»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

2. Are you

9 svarande

Female»5 55%
Male»4 44%
Other»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

Chalmers - work environment

3. How satisfied are you with your studies at Chalmers?

9 svarande

Very satisfied»3 33%
Satisfied»6 66%
Unsatisfied»0 0%
Very unsatisfied»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.66

4. How satisfied are you with the facilities of Chalmers?

9 svarande

Very satisfied»5 55%
Satisfied»3 33%
Unsatisfied»1 11%
Very unsatisfied»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.55

5. Did you experience inequalities and/ or discrimination due to gender, race, ethnicity, disability or religion during your study period at Chalmers?

9 svarande

Yes, on the Chalmers campus»0 0%
Yes, in the school of Architecture»0 0%
Yes, in the school of Architecture and at the campus»0 0%
No»9 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

Masters Programme (MPARC) - studio work environment

6. How satisfied are you with the masters studio?

9 svarande

Very satisfied»3 33%
Satisfied»5 55%
Unsatisfied»1 11%
Very unsatisfied»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

7. How satisfied are you with the teaching team?

9 svarande

Very satisfied»3 33%
Satisfied»5 55%
Unsatisfied»1 11%
Very unsatisfied»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.77

- In this studio, it seemed like not enough time was devoted by the teachers towards our project during the semester.» (Unsatisfied)

8. How did you find that you and your work was acknowledged and respected:

by the group?

9 svarande

Excellently»6 66%
Well»3 33%
Adequately»0 0%
Poorly»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

9. How did you find that you and your work was acknowledged and respected:

by the invited critics?

9 svarande

Excellently»6 66%
Well»3 33%
Adequately»0 0%
Poorly»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

10. How did the organisation, memoranda, direct information etc. function?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather well»7 87%
Very well»1 12%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.12

Goals and fullfilment of goals

The learning outcomes are given in the course programme, that is the knowledge, understanding, skills and perspectives you are expected to reach. Notify for each outcome how well they have been fulfilled.

11. Learning outcome 1

Develop an urban and/ or architecture programme and design proposition.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 11%
Sufficient»6 66%
Excellent»2 22%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.11

12. Learning outcome 2

The skills to conduct field studies, gathering data, and research on specific topics related to the specifics conditions for the design proposition.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 11%
Sufficient»7 77%
Excellent»1 11%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3

13. Learning outcome 3

General skills in design and technology through models and drawings.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»1 11%
Sufficient»8 88%
Excellent»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.88

14. Learning outcome 4

Students will have developed an understanding of contemporary urban and environmental issues and challenges.

9 svarande

Very insufficient»0 0%
Insufficient»0 0%
Sufficient»6 66%
Excellent»3 33%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.33

15. Are the aims and goals reasonable in relation to your pre-knowledge ?

9 svarande

No, the goals are to elementar»0 0%
Yes, the goals are reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are too ambitious»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

16. Are the goals reasonable in relation to the scope and amount of credits?

9 svarande

Too small scope in relation to credits»0 0%
Reasonable scope in relation to credits»9 100%
Too wide scope in relation to credits»0 0%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2

17. How did you find that you and your work was acknowledged and respected:

by the tutors?

9 svarande

Excellently»6 66%
Well»3 33%
Adequately»0 0%
Poorly»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

The future structure of the Masters Programme

The master structure is under a restructuring and future planning. This is happening in relationship to overall changes in the University: budget, curriculum, and course content. The following questions addresses the overall pedagogical structure of the masters programme in general:

18. What frequency of teacher input do you prefer?

9 svarande

1 time/week»2 22%
1-2 times/week»4 44%
2-3 times/week»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.11

- It would be great to have the teatcher abit closer, so you can ask question if you get stuck some time. It would be good, but its not neccesary to have tutorials 2-3 times a week. » (2-3 times/week)

19. How important is it for your general education to have a studio-based learning?

9 svarande

Very important»8 88%
Fairly important»1 11%
Not important»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.11

20. How important is it for you to participate in an international teaching environment (mix of students and backgrounds)?

9 svarande

Very important»5 55%
Fairly important»4 44%
Not important»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.44

Concluding questions

21. What is your overall opinion of the course?

9 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Passed»1 11%
Good»5 55%
Very good»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.22

- This course would have been better with a more clear/focused concept. I simply feel the time devoted by the teachers was inadequate.» (Passed)

22. Other comments

- I would love to have a bit more lectures during the course.»
- I think the course in general is good. some critique: the second semester (urban and architectural design 2) could have been a bit more structured (tasks/guidelines, mid-critique). it was a bit confusing to get alternately input by two different tutors, and a pity we didn"t get any tutorials by the main teacher, Ana Betancour!»
- I"d prefer tutorials every week in more critical way that would take us further in our work. I appreciate lectures given by different people outside the university/country and discussions we had.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från