Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

CFD with OpenFOAM, 2007-2008

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-04-03 - 2008-04-25
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Håkan Nilsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers
Klass: Övriga
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

1. If you started but did not finish this course, please state why.

- Jobbar på konsultfirma. Jag fick ett uppdrag hos kund vilket medförde svårigheter att hinna med OpenFOAM-kursen.»
- Did not have time to do the more time consuming project work.»

2. Comment the contents of the course and give your general impression of the course.

Did it cover what you expected? Was the syllabus appropriate (see the course homepage)? If not, please give some feedback.

- Would have hace wantede some more indepth about application development and programing»
- good»
- The course was really informative and covered more than expected. The course homepage and syllabus were clear.»
- rhe course covered what i expected even more as we have learned the use of OpenFoam in different areas as the one we are confortable in»
- Svårt att bedöma då jag endast var på första tillfället.»
- The content was about what I expected. I learned both about OpenFoam and some new things about CFD in general.»
- I"d expected more applications and less details on using Linux. Though I now realized it is very important to be fluint in Linux to work fast in OpenFOAM.»
- The contents of the course are very nice and cover most of what I expected. The syllabus are appropriate and they are a good reference especialy the part of impelementing new solver and boundary condition.»
- The course covered a wide range of interesting aspects in the program.»

3. Comment the schedule of the course.

Was it good/bad with three occasions and two days per occasion, or would it be better with shorter days and more often? Was the time between start and end of the course too long or too short?

- Intense is good!»
- good»
- It is good as it is now»
- i think that three seminars was the best schedule possible and the laps of time between them ideal. it let us the time to digest information.»
- I think it was a good distribution of occasions, especially for people from other citys. The 3X2 occasions solutions is practical from that point of view. For me the long time between start and end was good, because 1) It takes time to learn a new software and 2) as a PHD student there are often many other things that shall be done simultaneously.»
- Good with long days and fewer occasions.»
- For me it was very good.»
- I liked the three occasions but the hours per day were a bit too much and tight.»

4. What was your impression of the first occasion?

Please go to the course homepage to remember the contents of that occasion. Give some feedback on how to improve it.

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 22%
Good»6 66%
Excellent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

- Good with handed out slides. Good that we took a lot of time to learn how to compile. Maybe we should have been informed (maybe we were) that we should have read the manual before the first occasion. I did, and I think it made it more easy for me to follow the lectures.» (Excellent)

5. What was your impression of the second occasion?

Please go to the course homepage to remember the contents of that occasion. Give some feedback on how to improve it.

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»5 62%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

6. What was your impression of the third occasion?

Please go to the course homepage to remember the contents of that occasion. Give some feedback on how to improve it.

9 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»3 33%
Excellent»5 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.44

- May be the students should also give a feedback about the oral presentations (in a similar way as for the reports) and say what was good and what should be improved in the oral communication? It could be something simple such as some notes returned at the end of the presentations. » (Excellent)
- encouraging» (Excellent)

7. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Using the cvs to patch OpenFOAM»
- The mix of lecturing and experimenting your self in the computer lab.»
- nothing»
- the different projects by the "students". it gives a large perspective of OpenFoam»
- Add new tutorials.»
- I liked most of the parts»

8. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Make the course longer»
- There should be a limit of time to present the projects. One hour should be enough. No more.»
- nothing»
- nothing pops up right now that was so bad it should be changed»
- More smaller tutorials to learn the basic work to set up a case in OpenFOAM. This would be helpful for beginners.»
- More looking through the code implementations and C++.»

9. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»7 70%
Great extent»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Jag var bara med på första tillfället.» (Small extent)
- It helped me to avoid the simple traps when it comes to compilations, changing bc etc.» (Large extent)
- the lectures were held very nice and in good order, the problem was long lecture hours in sequence» (Large extent)

10. To what extent has the course material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»1 10%
Some extent»2 20%
Large extent»3 30%
Great extent»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- See previous point!» (Large extent)
- The course material is very good: enough detailed to allow doing all the training without attending to the 1st and 2nd occasions...» (Great extent)

11. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

- The structure of the handounts was a bit confusing. Maybe page numbering them would help.» (Rather well)

12. Comment the assessment of your learning.

Is the assessment of your learning (the project and the peer-review) appropriate? Give some suggestions.

- Good as it is»
- ok»
- This was really interesting. I found the peer reviewed quite hard to do as it was about a subject i di not have studied so that the only peer reviewed I did was the english corrections. Maybe it would be more interesting if we could peer reviewed a report that is quite close from our own subjects»
- Yes! I think it was a good course structure»
- Very good and I suggest more looking in the implementations and boundary conditions next time.»
- very good. the best possible way I can think about»

13. How much time did you spend on this course, and did it correspond to 5 credits?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work.

- More like 4 credits so make a little longer»
- ~4-5 weeks. 5 credits is fine!»
- I think I spent less time than I should for 5 credits»
- i do not know perhaps one or two month»
- Yes, I think it corresponded to about 5 credits.»
- About 8 weeks full time. It realy correspond to 5 credits but the most credits we got is the learning of how to use OpenFOAM.»
- I personally spent plenty of time on that.»

14. Additional comments

- Thanks for a great course!»
- it was a very nice course, that I appriciate and used a lot. Thank you»

Kursutvärderingssystem från