Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Non-equilibrium processes in physics, chemistry and biology, TIF106, MCC011

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 3
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

3 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»1 33%
Around 25 hours/week»1 33%
Around 30 hours/week»1 33%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

3 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 66%
100%»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

3 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»2 66%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

3 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»3 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

3 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 66%
Yes, definitely»1 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- One can write a lot on three pages. Instead of pure derivations on the exam one could set up a similar system and ask questions about it.» (To some extent)
- The theoretical questions on the exam tested if one had written down the derivations. They are not that interesting to test!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 100%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

3 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 33%
Large extent»2 66%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- Clearer litterature for the first part of the course would be nice. Updated lecture notes that covers all.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

3 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 100%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- The homework are not graded with points until after the exam. I can understand the reason why, but it is against Chalmers policy documents "rättssäkerhetsdokument". » (Rather well)
- More comments and how many points one got on the corrected home problems would have been nice. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

3 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»3 100%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

3 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»3 100%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

3 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 33%
High»2 66%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.66

12. How was the total workload this study period?

2 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»2 66%
Excellent»1 33%

Genomsnitt: 4.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Even though some constants and signs are not that important it gets more confusing when there are errors. e.g. during lectures.» (Good)
- The first part of the course was difficult and on a too high level.» (Good)
- I really enjoyed it» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The perspective of trying to give an overview and not too many detailed calculations. The balance is quite good.»
- Bernhard"s part of the course was excellent!»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- It takes too long time to read all the different compendiums/books/notes. A more extended version of ONE would be good. Or some summary telling which part is good from which sources gives a good extensive explamation so that one doesnt have to read all the overlaping material.»
- Nothing that I can think of.»
- The first part. It should be on a more suitable level. The lecture notes should follow the lectures or the other way around.»

16. Additional comments

- It worked rather well with two parts of the course. However, the first part was very much harder than Bernhard"s part. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.33

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.33
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.83

Kursutvärderingssystem från