Visa resultat

TMS086 Financial time series

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»		3		50%
Around 20 hours/week»		1		16%
Around 25 hours/week»		0		0%
Around 30 hours/week»		0		0%
At least 35 hours/week»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- This course was WAY too easy. At Teknisk Fysik we have had 4.5hp courses with the equivalent of ONE project and ONE home assignment PER WEEK (i.e. 14 submissions in total) AND a very serious final exam in the end. This is BY FAR the easiest course that I have taken since I started at Chalmers.» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»		0		0%
25%»		0		0%
50%»		0		0%
75%»		3		50%
100%»		3		50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

3. How understandable are the course goals?

I have not seen/read the goals»		4		66%
The goals are difficult to understand»		0		0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»		1		16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

- no goals presented.» (I have not seen/read the goals)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»		2		40%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»		3		60%
No, the goals are set too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

No, not at all»		1		25%
To some extent»		1		25%
Yes, definitely»		0		0%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»		2		50%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		0		0%
Some extent»		3		50%
Large extent»		1		16%
Great extent»		2		33%

Genomsnitt: 2.83

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

Small extent»		1		16%
Some extent»		3		50%
Large extent»		1		16%
Great extent»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 2.33

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

Very badly»		1		16%
Rather badly»		1		16%
Rather well»		4		66%
Very well»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- no goals presented» (Rather badly)
- Rather well, but the workload was highly under-dimensioned.» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

Very poor»		0		0%
Rather poor»		0		0%
Rather good»		3		50%
Very good»		3		50%
I did not seek help»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Explicit office hours would have been great.» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

Very poorly»		1		16%
Rather poorly»		1		16%
Rather well»		1		16%
Very well»		3		50%
I did not seek cooperation»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Swedish students tend to stay together and some are not very opened to international student» (Very poorly)

11. How was the course workload?

Too low»		2		33%
Low»		1		16%
Adequate»		1		16%
High»		2		33%
Too high»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- Extremely low in comparison to what we are capable of as well as in comparison to, for example, the courses within the Engineering Physics program.» (Too low)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

Too low»		1		16%
Low»		0		0%
Adequate»		2		33%
High»		2		33%
Too high»		1		16%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Extremely low. Hand-ins EVERY WEEK and at least FOUR PROJECTS would an appropriate minimum workload for a passing grade.» (Too low)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

Poor»		1		16%
Fair»		1		16%
Adequate»		2		33%
Good»		2		33%
Excellent»		0		0%

Genomsnitt: 2.83 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Interesting subject but the level of the work required was far too low. Please stretch us. We want to explore our limits.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

16. Additional comments