Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Energy related materials, TIF260

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?%
Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

5 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 60%
Around 20 hours/week»1 20%
Around 25 hours/week»1 20%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.6

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»1 16%
25%»1 16%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 33%
100%»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

5 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 20%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 80%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 60%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Would like an oral exam, in contest to the written one» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Both Maths and Cristophs lectures were good, but the guest lecturers were horrible.» (Large extent)
- Most of the lecturers were great, that is why I didn"t have to spend so much time for self-studies.» (Great extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

- Didn"t read the book. And didn"t seek other sources of information » (Small extent)
- Slides!» (Large extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»3 75%
Very well»1 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

5 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»4 80%
I did not seek help»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

5 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 20%
Very well»3 60%
I did not seek cooperation»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 80%
High»1 20%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

- It was a bit stressful to be able to study for the quizzes. Since they were calculated on the exam they seams to be necissary. » (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»1 16%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 16%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.66 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It is not up to the lecturer to decide whatever I will take my notes digital or at paper. I can"t understand how you can think that you have better knowledge about my notes than I self have. » (Poor)
- Really good and depth on the course. Enough topics and good information on them» (Excellent)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- I liked the quizzes even though they required us to study more.»
- The interaction between students and the teacher, the paper review was a good opportunity to learn more about some alternative technologies, the quizzes every course which gives us the motivation to work every week. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The quizzes. I do decide by my self when I want to learn something. That shouldn"t be up to the lecturers to decide. During my four years here hav I found a good way of learning and that doesn"t include quizzes. And the handout paper. Skip them and let the student do the notes digitally. »
- The tribological lecture. It was not that interesting and didn"t add anything to the course it seamed»

16. Additional comments

- I didn"t finishes the course du to the quizzes and attitude from the lecturers. They didn"t think that I could decide by my self and take the responsibility go my own learning. The course did sound quite fun but I wouldn"t ever take a course by someone that doesn"t let me do the learning in my own way. It is under all critic that you think that we are a ore university student and handle us like that. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.66

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.66
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

Kursutvärderingssystem från