ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

TIF205 Modeling of nuclear reactors

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 61%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

8 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 12%
Around 20 hours/week»1 12%
Around 25 hours/week»3 37%
Around 30 hours/week»1 12%
At least 35 hours/week»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- I worked very sporadically on the course while also writing papers, doing other work, etc. some weeks I did no work on the course at all and other weeks I spent every day (including weekends) working long hours on the course. In all, I think I spent more than 4 full work-weeks on the course.» (Around 20 hours/week)
- so much work load» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

8 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»0 0%
100%»8 100%

Genomsnitt: 5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

8 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 12%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 12%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 37%
Yes, definitely»2 25%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

6. With the course offered remotely, did you feel lost:

8 svarande

Yes, most of the time»1 12%
Sometimes»2 25%
No, never»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

- The course compendium, plus the webinars were a very complete source of information. On top of that, there was fluid e-mail communication with the course assistant, as well as dedicated Skype sessions in order to clarify doubts.» (No, never)

7. How would you rate the pedagogical quality of the webinars offered:

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 50%
Very good»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- Unfortunately,I didn"t know about the webinars at the beginning of the course.» (Rather good)

8. How would you rate the software used for the webinars (Mediasite):

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I came across some problems when running Mediasite on Ubuntu Linux 12.04.» (Rather good)
- It would have been nice to be able to save the lectures for viewing when I had no internet connection...» (Very good)

9. How would you rate the pedagogical quality of the tutorials offered:

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 50%
Very good»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

10. How would you rate the software used for the tutorials (AdobeConnect):

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- It would have been nice to be able to save the lectures for viewing when I had no internet connection...» (Very good)

11. Do you think a web-based course, as the one offered, could entirely replace classical classroom teaching:

8 svarande

Definitively no»3 37%
To some extent»3 37%
Definitively yes»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 1.87

- I rather believe on classical classroom teaching since more specific,clear and understandable,easy to communicate with tutor . » (Definitively no)
- The success of such web-based courses heavily depends on the degree of commitment from the student"s side. I do not believe all courses could adopt this method.» (To some extent)
- For a person like me that is working it is excellent to take the course in this way.» (Definitively yes)

12. What was the best feature(s) of this course (please also consider the web-based aspects of the course):

- flexibility in attending the lectures»
- I could manage my own times, i.e., I could read the course notes and then access the webinars on demand when I had the time. In that way, I already had an idea of the topics, and I knew where to pay attention more thoroughly during the webinar.»
- Very good webinars, but sometimes a bit too much explanations. Challenging home tasks.»
- Adobe connect,»
- being able to rewatch the lectures/tutorials over and over again is a very nice feature.»

13. What was the worst feature(s) of this course (please also consider the web-based aspects of the course):

- lack of human contact and of interaction professor/students»
- The course requires a high degree of commitment, but that was clearly highlighted during the introductory lecture. I experienced some problems with Mediasite, but after a while I knew when to re-load the webinar and there were no big issues.»
- Writing summaries of some chapters (especially chapter 2) felt sometimes not that meaningful.»
- nothing.»
- It"s simply much better to have ordinary lectures.»
- not being able to download the lectures/tutorials for viewing when I had no internet connection.»

14. Would you agree to participate in an additional survey on the web-based teaching aspects of the course, that the teaching staff would like to carry out? If yes, please provide your e-mail address belo

- alberto@nephy.chalmers.se»
- Yes. eric.dorval@aalto.fi »
- Yes. luanton@student.chalmers.se»
- mikael.fjallborg@vattenfall.com»
- no»
- scott.holcombe@hrp.no»

15. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»3 37%
Great extent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I have already identified aspects of this course (and specially, comments received during my examination) into my own research.» (Large extent)

16. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 25%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- The course notes are very comprehensive and concise. I seldom needed to look at other sources.» (Great extent)

17. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»1 12%
Very well»6 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.62

Study climate

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

8 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»1 12%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»6 75%
I did not seek help»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- I only asked questions via e-mail, and the answers were quick and accurate.» (Very good)

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

8 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»0 0%
I did not seek cooperation»5 62%

Genomsnitt: 4.25

- I attended the course remotely, and I did not use the discussion fora.» (I did not seek cooperation)
- I didn"t know about the webiners at the beginning» (I did not seek cooperation)

20. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
High»5 62%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

21. How was the total workload this study period?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 25%
High»3 37%
Too high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

- I also had other courses/research activities at my University.» (Too high)
- Luckily the other course I had this period was an easy one.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

22. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»1 12%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Very hard, but rewarding course.» (Good)
- This is one of the few courses where one really has to understand and fix the concepts by applying them in exercises.» (Excellent)

23. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Assignments»
- Contents, on-demand webinars, tutorials.»
- The webinars and the tutorials.»
- The chance to take it over the web.»
- voice records of tutor.»
- Klas!»
- everything»

24. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Maybe, it would be good to also have a home task on the last part of the course (Two-Phase Flows), but I also understand that the work load would become excessive.»
- It would have been nice to, somehow, highlight the most important equations in the compendium. As it is now, it can be difficult sometimes to find what expressions that are actually implemented or used.»
- If possible to add few opportunities or few basic knowledge on correspondent software(Matlab).»
- Web based lectures»
- nothing»

25. Additional comments

- I highly recommend this course among my colleagues.»
- Very interesting course!»
- Overall course was fairly difficult to understand it"s each and every content.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75

Kursutvärderingssystem från