Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

FUF025 Advanced subatomic physics

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 6
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Erika Thorsell»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

6 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 16%
Around 20 hours/week»1 16%
Around 25 hours/week»1 16%
Around 30 hours/week»3 50%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

6 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 50%
100%»3 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

6 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 16%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 16%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 66%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»3 50%
Yes, definitely»2 33%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 83%
Large extent»1 16%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.16

- I would like to have less Power Point based lecures. 60 slides are to much for one lecture. Since the slides were not covered in the literature it was a bit hard to study for the exam.» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

6 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 50%
Large extent»2 33%
Great extent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- The course literature was very good.» (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

6 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 83%
Very well»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- But the lecture slides were sometimes not really good.» (Rather well)
- It would have been nice to have got some feedback on the hand in problems. » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

6 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 16%
Very good»5 83%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

6 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 33%
Very well»2 33%
I did not seek cooperation»2 33%

Genomsnitt: 4

11. How was the course workload?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»2 33%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

12. How was the total workload this study period?

6 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 66%
High»1 16%
Too high»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

6 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 16%
Adequate»3 50%
Good»2 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Griffiths.»
- I think the examination was good, a mixture between an oral exam and hand ins during the course. The course book of Griffiths definitely should be preserved for next year. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The problem concerning the program should not be part of the hand-ins, that are part of the total grade. This problem took too much time for being solved. The slides/lecture notes about astro physics and th shell model need to be changed. There is no obvious structure indicated and even some mistakes.»
- The homework sets should be corrected faster and at least be handed back to the students before the exam. Otherwise the students have no chance to know if they did well or not and if they understood the subject or not. The slides (especially on the nuclear shell model and the astrophysics) should be a bit more structured.»
- Exercise classes. More feedback on the hand in problems. »
- No CENS exercise (or hand out a manual if such can be written - which I doubt).»
- More structure in the rest of the course material when it comes to lecture notes. Repeatedly reminders on when and how the oral exam is gonna be. Make clear from the beginning what part of the course will be examined by the hand ins and what part will be examined in the oral exam.»
- Some lecture slides were condufsing. »

16. Additional comments

Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.16

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.16
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.54

Kursutvärderingssystem från