ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Lp 4 12/13 Structural concrete, VBB072

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-13
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 28%
Kontaktperson: Patrik Hellman»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Learning outcomes and examination

Learning outcome (after completion of this course, the student should be able to)
- describe and explain the non-linear mechanical behaviour of slabs, plates and discontinuity regions of reinforced concrete loaded until failure,
- describe and explain various approaches to analyse these reinforced concrete members and express limitations and ranges of validity,
- analyse, design and detail reinforced concrete slabs, plates and discontinuity regions on the basis of plastic analysis,
- perform design work in project teams concerning structural analysis, reinforcement design and detailing of flat slabs using linear FE-analysis, and present the result in a technical report with sketches,
- critically review technical reports concerning design work based on FE-analysis,
- describe and explain the mechanical behaviour of prestressed concrete members loaded until failure, especially in relation to reinforced concrete elements,
- analyse, design and detail statically determinate structural elements of prestressed concrete.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

14 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 7%
60-80%»6 42%
80-100%»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.42

- Every things were excellent» (80-100%)

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

14 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 14%
Yes, definitely»12 85%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»12 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- Mainly lectures» (Great extent)
- Great lectures! Keep up the good work! » (Great extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»12 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

14 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 14%
Very good»12 85%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- It was a bit tough in the beginning but we told Mario and Björn and they increased the amount of hours availiable for consultaion. It was appriciated alot.» (Very good)

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 7%
Very well»13 92%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

- This was a Björn Engström course. Everything that you wanted was availiable onlune» (Very well)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

14 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»3 21%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»6 42%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- Would have liked some experiments where one can see what actually happens» (Large extent)

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

14 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
about 50%»3 21%
60-80%»10 71%
more than 80%»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

- It is quite rough. The other course geotechnincs had nothing to do with my 8 weeks. I only studied concrete... So it is a bit to stiff for a 7.5 cred course.» (more than 80%)

10. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 28%
High»9 64%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.78

- Its on the border between adequate and high.» (Adequate)
- High is good. That"s the only way to learn much. » (High)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.64

- Best course on the masters program the first year» (Excellent)
- One of the best courses so far during my four years at Chalmers. » (Excellent)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

14 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»0 0%
Neutral»0 0%
Rahter high»5 35%
Very high»9 64%

Genomsnitt: 4.64

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The lectures»
- Björn Engström! And all his examples»
- Björn Engström.»
- all of the moments that vi had»
- -Björn Engströms world class lectures and organisation of the course -Structure of the course -Examples »
- Everything»
- The lecture form with theory and exercises mixed. I think that it worked really well and that one had to be active during the entire lectures. »
- excersises»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Consider changing a large project regarding slabs, which credited a totalt 20% of the grade. To a more on going project conserning all different course elements. Now we just did the slabs in the project and the slabs was basically the easiest part of the course. A smaller project regarding both continuity regions and prestressing would be better.»
- More support around The fem-project»
- The FEM-project needs to be better organized. We spent much more time trying to figure out how abaqus works than we did working with the actual concrete slab.»
- better organisation for project»
- There was too little time for the part prestressed concrete. Maybe some time can be borrowed from slabs or strut & tie. The FEM project: a lot of time went to writing the rapport, which felt repetitive to write. Maybe it can be slimmed by a few chapters. Also better information about how to work in abaqus would help. Most of the time goes to model in abaqus because it is such a non user friendly software. »
- Can"t think of anything that need to be changed»
- The instructions for the FEM-project could perhaps be a bit further developed. »
- better computer rooms and easier to get help with assignment.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från