|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Innovation management seminar course IIN070 2012LP1, IIN070Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-06-02 - 2013-06-10 Antal svar: 19 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 73% Kontaktperson: Maria Elmquist» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Overall impressions1. How was the course workload?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - Especially considering the RDM by Holmén» (Adequate) 2. What is your general impression of the course?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.63 - There was not enough feedback or more correctly, there was no feedback on the assignments. Which made it very hard to improve.» (Fair) 3. What do you think about the course administration?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.1 - No resources, poorly formulated PM, faulty PM (wrong dates)» (Bad) 4. What do you think about seminar-based teaching as a format?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.73 - Pros: Discussing, much learnings
Cons: Not focus on learnings of the article but rather learnings on assessing articles. Practical application?» (Rather good) 5. Was the term-paper seminar useful to your own writing process?*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.05 - I knew most of it from earlier courses, but repetition is always good and the slides were useful in clarifying some things about the structure of the report. » (Yes) 6. What do you think of the examination format? (50% seminars, 50% term paper)*19 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.31 - There was too much focus on the term paper, which in my opinion was not as useful as the seminars.» (Rather bad) Lectures and SeminarsOnly answer if you participated in the lectures - if not please choose "No opinion"7. What did you think of the lectures/seminars?Please only grade the ones you participated in!Matrisfråga - It"s obvious that Marcus is a very structured and neat person who likes to organize things. But in a seminar, I would recommend just keeping it casual and natural (like the others), and not structuring everything and somehow trying to maximize what we get out of the seminar. It"s kinda like trying to structure an open interview - the point is to keep it open and casual if you want to get the most out of it.» Lecture I - Course Introduction & Reading/Analyzing Texts (Maria E)
Genomsnitt: 3.42 Lecture II - Writing Research Papers (Maria E)
Genomsnitt: 3.52 Seminar 1 - Open Innovation (Maria E)
Genomsnitt: 4.07 Seminar 2 - The Role of Design in Innovation (Ingo R)
Genomsnitt: 4 Seminar 3 - Value Appropriation for Environmental Innovations (Marcus L)
Genomsnitt: 3.13 Seminar 4 - Idea Selection at the Front-End of Innovation (Anne E-T)
Genomsnitt: 3.72 Seminar 5 - Innovation Capabilities (Sofia B)
Genomsnitt: 3.91 Seminar 6 - Effectuation (Henrik B)
Genomsnitt: 3.88 Seminar 7 - Knowledge Management (Jan W)
Genomsnitt: 3.8 Seminar 8 - Business Model Innovation (Joakim B)
Genomsnitt: 3.54 Additional comments8. Please write down any additional comments and suggestions of improvements- Again, give grades after each seminar. That will allow students to improve over the semester, instead of perhaps being stuck doing the same things wrong.»- Seminars: When choosing between 8 seminars, you inevitibly miss out on 3/8 subjects. Although I think it is suboptimal, I"m not sure how it could be fixed. Term paper: I think some supervision during the process of the term paper is necessary. I would also appreciate clearer guidelines for what we are expected to deliver (which supervision meetings would be good for). For examples, during the TCIT course we had supervision two times, 20-30 mins each, and it was very valuable and perfectly enough.» - Feedback is by far the biggest missing piece of the puzzle in this course! (!!) Although self-studies are nice (on occasion), without any feedback or any learning-loop it becomes difficult to learn I think. It feels like this goes against a majority of science in the pedagogic field. Of course there should always be an aim to be as fair as possible, but I think one should think long before putting teaching aside to being completely fair.» - It would have been great to receive the points of each hand in as soon as possible (no feedback required unless the student sends an email requesting the feedback). Also a possibility to receive feedback about the term paper by adding a midway deadline in order for students to know what they should improve on in their term paper.» - Having seminars that are not graded is very useful. It enabled practing a discipline I was not very comfortable with. One reason i chose this course was to improve this skill. For the hand-ins, it would be great to gain individual feedback after each seminar, or at least the first. This so that one can eliminate simple errors and wrong thinking. » - I was really excited about this course before it started. Unfortunately it did not deliver on my expectations. The biggest issue is arguably the lack of resources, which means that there is no feedback on the term papers. I had hoped to get valuable insight in how to write a paper, but without any feedback I felt like I was fumbling in the dark and did not learn nearly as much as I would have liked. The basic idea of the course is very good and I hope it gets more resources for next year!» - I did not appreciate going a whole course without a clue if anything I did was good or not. Worst case scenario I"ll have performed badly on all seminar hand-ins and my term-paper is subpar all without me knowing or being able to do anything about it. This course cries out for feedback or needs to compensate by more detailed criteria for grading.» - I understand that giving the students access to the score directly after each seminar might be hard to administer. However, the current situation is not good in any way for the students. Since the score has been made available after the seminars in previous years, it would seem possible to have done it this year as well. Several of the seminar leaders also said something along the lines of “,the hand-ins have already been marked, so don’,t be scared to say stupid things here now…,”, - which seemingly would imply that the scores often were available. With the current system of not knowing how high you scored on the last seminar it became hard to adapt or improve the way you formulated your literature reflections. The “,general feedback”, we got from the seminar leaders was very hard to act upon and contradictions between different seminar leaders were common. I understand that different seminar leaders look at and focus on different things, but having access to your own personal score reviles much more information you need to improve than getting general comments based on 15 students’, hand-ins. With the general feedback-system it is hard to know what part of the feedback actually applies to your hand-in and you might in fact end up making your next hand in worse if acting on it than you would otherwise have. This critique is all the more relevant since submitting this type of hand-in is not a common practice in other MEI-courses and the uncertainty as to what is requested therefore is high. » - Jag gillade upplägget på kursen med 50% seminarium och 50 % term paper. Jag tycker även att seminarierna vi kunde välja mellan kändes väldigt aktuella och bra uppdaterade med verkligheten! Dock vet jag inte om jag lärde mig något under kursen, då vi inte fick någon feedback alls!!, Till nästa år tycker jag man borde få betyget på ens resention efter varje seminarium, så att man vet vad man gort bra och vad som var dåligt!!, hur skall man annars lära sig något?? Det hade även varit bra med någon handledning till projektet!!, i alla fall ett handlednings tillfälle för att få feedback när man börjat skriva och inte bara i början. » - The topics and articles for seminars were well chosen, interesting and relevant. But I really feel that I didn"t learn almost anything in this course, for the reasons mentioned above. » Thank you!* obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%