ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Traffic and Urban Planning, BOM040

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-04-01 - 2008-05-01
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 62%
Kontaktperson: Ida Karlsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 7 35%

Around 20 hours/week» 9 45%

Around 25 hours/week» 1 5%

Around 30 hours/week» 3 15%

At least 35 hours/week» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I was very lazy but i had no problems to get grade 5 on the exam.» (At most 15 hours/week)
- More time just before the exam» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 0 0%

75%» 11 55%

100%» 9 45%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 2 10%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 7 35%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 11 55%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

20 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 2 10%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 18 90%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

20 svarande

No, not at all» 1 5%

To some extent» 7 35%

Yes, definitely» 12 60%

I don"t know/have not been examined yet» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

- U just had to read the questions handed out by gunnar to make the exam. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 0 0%

Some extent» 6 30%

Large extent» 12 60%

Great extent» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- It seems like the teacher has difficulties with the english so the language on the lessons are kind easy, sometimes it feels like the teacher wants to say something but he cant because of the language. The level of the lessons have been much lower since we got the english spoken lessons!!!!» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent» 2 10%

Some extent» 10 50%

Large extent» 8 40%

Great extent» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

- what course litterature...» (Small extent)
- The course litterature are very limtted and some of them are not even translated to english.» (Some extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 2 10%

Rather well» 15 75%

Very well» 3 15%

Genomsnitt: 3.05

- it would have been good if all lecture slides and other course material were put on the course homepage» (Rather badly)
- It is better to post course material in advance.» (Rather badly)
- Alot of the material handed out during the course was missing on the homepage.» (Rather well)
- More handouts on the web» (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 7 35%

Very good» 13 65%

I did not seek help» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- mapinfo and very poor opportunities to get help» (Rather good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 4 20%

Rather well» 7 35%

Very well» 9 45%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- we looked differently on how much time should be put on the differnt tasks » (Rather poorly)
- I think some of my fellow students had bad preknowledge about the subject and simple things like using office programs. This made it hard to cooperate with this persons.» (Rather poorly)

11. How should the group composition be decided?

19 svarande

By the teacher» 4 21%

By the students» 8 42%

By the teacher and the students together» 7 36%

Genomsnitt: 2.15

- not sure whats best » (?)

12. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low» 1 5%

Low» 5 25%

Adequate» 12 60%

High» 2 10%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

13. How was the total workload this study period?

20 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 7 35%

Adequate» 11 55%

High» 1 5%

Too high» 1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- I had been taken 3 course plus my master thesis» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 3 15%

Adequate» 3 15%

Good» 12 60%

Excellent» 2 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

- dind´,t learn so much that we didn´,t learn i teknisk samhällsplanering in v3» (Fair)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The trip to Copenhagen and Malmö»
- The studt visit to Denmark»
- Oral presentations and assignament, they were very helpfull, and the student trip to cophenague»
- The lectures and the study trip»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- A clear courseplan to be followed. Material in english all the time please!»
- Have some limits of the prestudies for exchange students. Today it seems like the students from abroad dont have as much competence as the swedish students»
- publish the questions about the course early to give students enough time to collect more clearly informations about the course.»
- Maybe more litterature about the different issues»
- better help on mapinfo lessons»
- the course content needs some kind of revision.»

17. Additional comments

- Teacher seems to stressed and wasnt prepared for this course.»
- I"m very satisfy with the course»
- The course content should be revised so as to focus more on design rather than just supervision and structural and geometric design was not included at all which i belive is the major task of any road work. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från