Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
SP4_12/13 Knowledge and learning in project organisations, BOM090
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-06-03 - 2013-09-15 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 17% Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
1. Which programme do you belong to?*8 svarande
International Project Management» | | 6 | | 75% |
Design and Construction Project Management» | | 2 | | 25% |
Erasmus student or else» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.25 2. One question about the course in general*Estimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of this statement, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga The general impression is that the course was very good* 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 5 | | 62% |
4» | | 2 | | 25% |
5» | | 1 | | 12% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 3. Five questions about the courseEstimate to what extent, on a scale from 1- 5 , you share the opinion of these statements, where 1 means that you do NOT AT ALL agree with the statement 5 means that you COMPLETELY agree with the statement
Matrisfråga - The definitely has potential for a much higher degree of significance for the overall education. Since the topic itself (Knowledge and learning) is hard to capture/define, the course already aims in the right direction but there is room for improvement.»
- The seminars could be better structured with more practical activities/games where we can train our knowledge management skills. e.g. story telling, presentation techniques »
- I would have liked more examples from the industry, for example having guest lecturers working in construction showing us how to apply the course content at work»
It was clear to me what the learning outcomes of the course were 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 12% |
3» | | 3 | | 37% |
4» | | 4 | | 50% |
5» | | 0 | | 0% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.37 The examination and the aims of the course were well related 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 0 | | 0% |
3» | | 3 | | 37% |
4» | | 3 | | 37% |
5» | | 2 | | 25% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 The course was very well administered 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 12% |
3» | | 1 | | 12% |
4» | | 4 | | 50% |
5» | | 2 | | 25% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.87 I felt that the course had a high degree of significance for my education 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 12% |
3» | | 5 | | 62% |
4» | | 1 | | 12% |
5» | | 1 | | 12% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 The course demanded a high degree of work effort 8 svarande
1» | | 0 | | 0% |
2» | | 1 | | 12% |
3» | | 5 | | 62% |
4» | | 2 | | 25% |
5» | | 0 | | 0% |
I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 4. What elements of the course should definitely remain?- Lectures and semminars, however semminars could have a bit different form. Analysis of one article was definitely not enough to fulfill the whole semminar and I had a feeling that we did not really know what to talk about there.»
- The guest lecturers. But the relation to knowledge and learning was sometimes unclear to me. This requires more explanatory work in advance to create the clear link to the course topics.»
- guest lectures, group discussions about the articles»
- All»
- Weekly assigments with articles.»
- Weekly lectures with different subjects related to the course»
5. Were there any elements missing in the course?- Its hard to say since I had not known much about this topic before the course. But some more deep discussions about the two contrary aspects of what knowledge is would be beneficial.»
- No»
- Clear schedule»
6. What, if anything, do you think should be changed in the course?- See above.»
- The paper review and presntation sessions are a nice idea, but the commitment by the students were low since the importance/impact on the course were questioned.»
- the seminars were a bit unorganized, especially in the beginning, I think they should be more structured»
- Use the time in the seminars with more creativity»
- Ā bit less literature for the articles so they can actually be read and then more requirement to actually use it when writing about them in the essays. »
7. In what way do you feel this course relates to the programme and the other courses?- It related pretty good I can say due to its current application in my job. Also I"ve found many open job positions for Knowledge Management in the industry. So it is definitely asked for in the industry/non-profit organizations.»
- It brings a reflection on how difficult it is to store and transfer knowledge from one project to another and suggests possible ways of doing it»
- well. but since it is such a unspecific and hard to get course I really think that more practical training would be good for our further work life»
8. Which parts/elements of the course were the most important for your learning outcome?If there is anything missing in the list below, please let us know! (Comments)Matrisfråga - As stated above more examples from the industry are needed. »
Lectures 8 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 12% |
+» | | 4 | | 50% |
++» | | 3 | | 37% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 Exercises 6 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 20% |
OK» | | 3 | | 60% |
+» | | 1 | | 20% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 Workshops 8 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 25% |
OK» | | 2 | | 50% |
+» | | 1 | | 25% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 4 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2 Project work 6 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 20% |
+» | | 3 | | 60% |
++» | | 1 | | 20% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Ask questions 7 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 33% |
+» | | 3 | | 50% |
++» | | 1 | | 16% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.83 Hand -ins 7 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 33% |
+» | | 2 | | 33% |
++» | | 2 | | 33% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Examination 8 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 14% |
OK» | | 1 | | 14% |
+» | | 1 | | 14% |
++» | | 4 | | 57% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 Team work 7 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 14% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 3 | | 42% |
++» | | 3 | | 42% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 Independent work 7 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 2 | | 33% |
+» | | 2 | | 33% |
++» | | 2 | | 33% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 1 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 Occasions with critique (feedback) 7 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 14% |
OK» | | 4 | | 57% |
+» | | 2 | | 28% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 Guest lectures 8 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 1 | | 12% |
+» | | 6 | | 75% |
++» | | 1 | | 12% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3 External study visits 7 svarande
-» | | 1 | | 100% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 6 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1 Other element 6 svarande
-» | | 0 | | 0% |
OK» | | 0 | | 0% |
+» | | 0 | | 0% |
++» | | 0 | | 0% |
Not relevant / I dont know» | | 6 | | |
Genomsnitt: 0 Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.5 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62* obligatoriska frågor
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|