Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Functional materials, TIF115
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15 Antal svar: 5 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: ?% Kontaktperson: Bengt-Erik Mellander»
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e. knowledge, skills and attitueds to be acquired by the student during the course.1. How understandable are the course goals?5 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 4 | | 80% |
The goals ar difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give som guidance but could be clearer» | | 1 | | 20% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.4 - Are there any goals?» (I have not seen/read the goals)
2. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?2 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 50% |
Yies, teh goals seem reasonable» | | 1 | | 50% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.5 3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?5 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 20% |
To som extent» | | 4 | | 80% |
Yes, definitely» | | 0 | | 0% |
I have not been examined yet» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - Not sure if the exam asseses if the goals have been reacched, however, the exam did not seem to reflect the course» (No, not at all)
- The exam didn"t deal with the same materials as the lectures. Or at least we"re there small correlation between them. » (To som extent)
Teaching and course administration4. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Great extent» | | 1 | | 20% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 5. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?5 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 3 | | 60% |
100%» | | 2 | | 40% |
Genomsnitt: 4.4 6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?5 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 40% |
Large extent» | | 3 | | 60% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.6 7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?5 svarande
Very badly» | | 2 | | 40% |
Rather badly» | | 2 | | 40% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 - There were no info. No course pm, no levels for different grades at the exam and so on.» (Very badly)
- Did not find a course PM. Didn"t know what to bring to the exam until the last week. Did not know that there was a paper with the presentation until one week before deadline.» (Very badly)
Study climate8. How were the oppurtunities för asking questions and getting help?5 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 2 | | 40% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 60% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.6 - Good answer to the mail. Good respond on asking questions» (Very good)
9. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?5 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 1 | | 20% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 80% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | |
Genomsnitt: 3.8 10. How was the course workload?5 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 80% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.8 11. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?5 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 20% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 4 | | 80% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.8 12. How was the total workload this study period?5 svarande
Too low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Low» | | 1 | | 20% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 60% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.4
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?5 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 20% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 40% |
Good» | | 2 | | 40% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3 14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The projects were definitely interesting. »
- Some more planing and administration would be grate. The rest works well. »
- More info on what is required for the course»
- The variety of topics covered»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Include more innovative materials - something really new like graphene. Besides maybe the plasmons nothing of the things covered in the course was new to physicists.»
- The lack of info»
- The lectures and the presentation»
- Better information, Course-PM, give information earlier. »
16. Additional comments- Better communication would be nice. We were not all informed how the total grading exactly works. Not even after sending emails!!»
- Good course with a lack of info»
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|