ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Project in Applied Mechanics 2013, TME130

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-04 - 2013-09-14
Antal svar: 15
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 39%
Kontaktperson: Mikael Enelund»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

15 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 13%
Around 20 hours/week»3 20%
Around 25 hours/week»6 40%
Around 30 hours/week»4 26%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- As expected, the workload increased towards the end of the course.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

15 svarande

0%»1 6%
25%»2 13%
50%»6 40%
75%»2 13%
100%»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.4

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

The course PM states:

After completion of this course, you should:
o be able to demonstrate capability to master problems with open solutions spaces this includes handle uncertainties and limited information,
o be able to apply previously learned theory, simulation methods and tools to handle industrial mechanical engineering problems,
o be able to create appropriate simulations models and experiments to solve a specific simulations problem,
o be able to use Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) tools to simulate product or device performances,
o be able o plan and carry out advanced tasks within specified time frames,
o show insight and ability to work in teams and collaborate in groups with different compositions, and
o be able to give written and oral presentations of a larger technical investigation.




15 svarande

No idea what they mean»1 6%
A bit fuzzy»2 13%
Understandable»10 66%
Crystal clear»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

4. To which extent have you established the knowledge and skills that the goals state?

15 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 13%
Most of it»13 86%
Perfectly»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

14 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»13 92%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.07

Teaching and course administration

6. Which project did you work with and to which extent do you think your project task was aligned with the course goals?

Matrisfråga

- What was hard with this project was the setting of the goal, which affected the planning report especially. Those setting the grade was not satisfied with the goals because they were to unclear. But sitting on the opposite side trying to create goals we do not even understand, decreases the quality quite significant compare to other projects with specific goals. Maybe it should not be a problem but I still think it should be considered and known by the examiners somehow. »
- The project title was misleading. Our group members expected a CAD-model from the company that we would use for our analyses. Instead, we had to design a wind turbine ourselves, perform CFD analyses and finally solid analyses. This was much more than expected and since most of us did these specific tasks (unsteady 2D-CFD, transient FEM) for the first time, it took much longer than expected. Overall, the task was a bit too complex for a short project course.»

Evaporating spray in hot air flow
7 svarande

Not at all»0 0%
Somewhat»3 42%
Well»2 28%
Perfect match»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

Experimental, numerical, and theoretical studies of a Francis turbine
3 svarande

Not at all»1 33%
Somewhat»1 33%
Well»1 33%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Dynamics of an offshore-based vertical axis wind turbine
3 svarande

Not at all»1 33%
Somewhat»1 33%
Well»1 33%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Failure of a wind turbine blade
3 svarande

Not at all»1 33%
Somewhat»1 33%
Well»1 33%
Perfect match»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Design of a fan wheel in a plastic material
5 svarande

Not at all»1 20%
Somewhat»0 0%
Well»3 60%
Perfect match»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

7. Which project did you work with and how do you rate the supervision within the project?

Matrisfråga

- The supervision from our university supervisor was very good. He took a lot of time and was always very helpful and friendly. The supervision from the company was very poor, however. We never met the actual inventor of this type of wind turbine but only the business man. Though, the input from the company was not very helpful since the business man did not know so much about the technology itself.»

Evaporating spray in hot air flow
6 svarande

Poor»1 16%
Ok»1 16%
Good»3 50%
Excellent»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Experimental, numerical, and theoretical studies of a Francis turbine
1 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»1 100%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Dynamics of an offshore-based vertical axis wind turbine
3 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 33%
Good»2 66%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

Failure of a wind turbine blade
1 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»1 100%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Design of a fan wheel in a plastic material
4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»0 0%
Good»0 0%
Excellent»4 100%

Genomsnitt: 4

8. How do you rate the planning report review session?

15 svarande

Poor»2 13%
Ok»6 40%
Good»4 26%
Excellent»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- The planning report was a heavy waste of time» (Poor)
- We received helpful input from the examiners and the course representative, especially the importance of how one writes down the goals.» (Excellent)

9. How do you rate the final presentation and opposition session?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»3 20%
Good»10 66%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 2.93

- Except josefsons weird faces» (Good)
- Could be a break between each group. » (Good)
- We received good questions from the opposing team and good feedback from the examiners. Also, I am grateful for the provided drinks and food.» (Excellent)

10. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 13%
Good»9 60%
Excellent»4 26%

Genomsnitt: 3.13

- Good job with ping pong, sometimes just a bit late... » (Excellent)

11. How do you rate the generic skills lectures (project management and reporting)?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Ok»6 42%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

- Why did we have them????» (Poor)
- Maybe not needed for fulfilling the course goals but interesting and good repetition from previous project courses (bachelor thesis for example)» (Good)

12. How do you rate the ANSYS guest lecture?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»5 35%
Good»7 50%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- Nice insight into how the different programs are linked and can be used together» (Good)

13. What do you think of the opportunity to anonymously grade your fellow team members? Please comment whether the critera were helpful or not?

15 svarande

Bad»3 20%
Indifferent»6 40%
Good»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- Stupid idea!» (Bad)
- Not necessary if everyone works hard in the group » (Bad)
- The teachers sounded very sveptical at the feedback so i think that is a strange way to get graded» (Indifferent)
- I think our grading where quite different within the group mostly because it is hard to se a clear line between different grades in som cases. Also I think you should change the last criteria so that you don"t get fail atomatic if your are late once or twice (criteria say always on time on grade 2-5)» (Indifferent)
- did not affect final grade» (Indifferent)
- It is extremely hard to grade your own team members, especially if you know them well. » (Indifferent)
- Should definitely have a bigger impact on the grade! » (Good)
- It can be good if someone hasn"t done anything and I think it is good to include even thoungh it is difficult to grade your team members.» (Good)
- I think this is a good measure of individual performance/contribution. This is otherwise hard to see for the examiners or supervisors.» (Good)
- Criteria were very helpful during grading» (Good)

14. What do you think of the feedback session? Please comment

15 svarande

Unnecessary»1 6%
Necessary but could be improved»3 20%
Valuable»11 73%
Priceless»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.66

- I think it was really good but could include more time.» (Valuable)
- Honest feedback whick is good for the master thesis» (Valuable)
- A final feedback session in which everyone one individually receives a feedback is a good event that concludes the course.» (Valuable)
- Good comments from Mikael.» (Valuable)
- Went through what to improve upon, good comments and tips for future projects. Much appreciated.» (Valuable)

Study climate

15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

15 svarande

Poor»2 13%
Ok»4 26%
Good»3 20%
Excellent»6 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.86

- Teachers at exercise?! » (Poor)
- One of the better courses for handling questions and when seeking guidance» (Excellent)

16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Ok»2 13%
Good»6 40%
Excellent»7 46%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Except one student, the cooperation with my fellow students was very good and we clearly defined our responsibilities.» (Good)
- We had a good time in our group» (Excellent)

17. How was the course workload?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 33%
High»8 53%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- It was very high due to the unclear project title that led to a lot of different subtasks in our project.» (High)

18. How was the total workload this study period?

15 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 33%
High»8 53%
Too high»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- Around 50h per week, perfect! » (Adequate)
- Stupid turbulence assignments » (High)
- All of the following tasks were during 7 days period where we had to hand in project report, opposition report and have final presentation. At the same time hand in a large assignment report in Turbulence modeling.» (Too high)
- I took three courses this quarter.» (Too high)

Summarizing questions

19. What is your general impression of the course?

15 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»7 46%
Good»5 33%
Excellent»2 13%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- Enjoyed the variety of projects to choose from before course start, all seemed interesting and it was hard to choose. » (Excellent)

20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation and the way it was achieved. I think the schedule for it was good. It was good that the project finished in week 8 before the exams.»
- - Choice of at least 5 different projects - Good supervision (examiners, supervisors, ANSYS etc.)»
- Different projects to choose from. »
- Good that not not mandatory to be present during all presentations of other groups. The variety of projects. »

21. What should changed to next year/where do you see opportunity for improvement?

- Clearer goal for the project»
- Higher impact from personal grades, teachers on exercises and a better schedule (earlier). »
- Hand in a draft of the planning report. And I think it is good if both examiners looks at the reports to get a fair grade for all reports. »
- - Providing a balanced number of projects concerning fluid analysis, solid analysis and structural analysis. This quarter, there was rarely a project dealing with structural analysis. - No misleading project descriptions»
- The individual grading system. Perhaps it can be changed so it does not include grading yourself and your team members. An individual session with the supervisor where one can discuss the other team members contribution could be an option. »

22. Additional comments

- I think the grading was fair, but I think the feeling I got from the teachers were that the writing of the report was not a big deal. It was graded more seriously than the attidude towards it was during the writing. Another thing that is not just about this course is that it should be considered to create a computer room for simulations with more powerful computers.In that case half of the computer rooms do not need to be occupied because the simulations have to run and the time needed would decrease. It would be great if this could be solved as it would help the students a lot. »
- None»

Kursutvärderingssystem från