ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Course Evaluation Advanced Vehicle Dynamics 2013, TME102

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-30 - 2013-09-19
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Mathias Lidberg»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

<15 hours/week»1 7%
Around 20 hours/week»7 53%
Around 30 hours/week»5 38%
Around 40 hours/week»0 0%
>50 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.3

2. Attendance on lectures

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

13 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»2 15%
>75%»11 84%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

3. Attendence on problem solving sessions

How many per cent of the problem solving sessions did you attend?

13 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»2 15%
50-75%»3 23%
>75%»8 61%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.46

- Please ask someone else to do the problem solving session. It is very hard to follow him and he is not clear and does not explain anything.» (25-50%)

4. Attendance on assignments sessions

How many per cent of the lectures did you attend?

13 svarande

<25%»0 0%
25-50%»0 0%
50-75%»1 7%
>75%»12 92%

Genomsnitt: 3.92

Teaching and course administration

5. What is your opinion of the main course text book by Pacejka?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»4 66%
Very good»2 33%
No opinion»7

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- It"s pretty complicated and found it hard to follow in many places.» (Rather good)
- Did not buy it. The lecture notes were enough» (No opinion)

6. What is your opinion of the lecture notes?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»8 61%
Very good»5 38%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.38

- Some parts were brief and hard to understand.» (Rather good)
- Didn"t find much difference between Packeja and Lecture notes, maybe a bit more explanation in them.» (Very good)

7. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»5 38%
Very well»8 61%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

8. What is your opinion of the material selected for the lectures?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»8 66%
Very good»4 33%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- Great assignments!» (Rather good)
- A good mix of mechanics and control.» (Very good)

9. What is your opinion of the teaching in lectures?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»5 38%
Very good»8 61%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.61

- Mathias your teaching is really good. I must say I have learn"t a lot more in this course than the Basic. Again everyone had issues with Bengt"s teaching. Keep up the good work :)» (Very good)

10. What is your opinion of the material selected for the problem solving sessions?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 8%
Rather good»8 66%
Very good»3 25%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.16

- Didn"t do the problems. No point without solutions.» (No opinion)

11. What is your opinion of the teaching in the problem solving sessions?

13 svarande

Very bad»4 30%
Rather bad»5 38%
Rather good»3 23%
Very good»1 7%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.07

- Already explained, please ask someone else to do the PSS from next year.» (Very bad)
- The problems needs to be explained more and more focus should be on how to approach the problem and how to solve them. Just showing equations is not the best way. Room for improvement here!» (Very bad)
- He was mainly just reproducing the solutions on the blackboard and only explaining the problems from a mathematical point of view, and did not talk anything about the vehicle dynamics involved. » (Very bad)
- I would prefer more pedagogical presentation of the problem solving. The problems where solved rather quick without really explaining what was being done and why. More focus on the strtegy of solving a problem and what assumptions were made and why.» (Rather bad)
- There were no introduction to the problems. He just started writing a lot of equations and did not explain so mush. Would have been better with more explaining about the approach and how to think for each problem.» (Rather bad)

12. What is your opinion of the material selected for the assignments sessions?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»9 69%
Very good»4 30%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.3

13. What is your opinion of the work load of the assignments?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»11 91%
Very good»1 8%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.08

14. What is your opinion of teaching in assignments sessions?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»6 50%
Very good»6 50%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.5

15. What is your opinion about using Simulink as tool in this course?

- Very good. »
- Very good!»
- Good, it is a nice tool.»
- Since I believe it is used "in the real world" I think it is good»
- Insightful»
- It"s good to get practice using simulink and I think it was a good tool to use in this course.»

16. What is your opinion about the lab at Stora Holm?

12 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»1 10%
Very good»9 90%
No opinion»2

Genomsnitt: 3.9

- It would have been better if we all got a chance to drive for more than 1 experiment» (Rather good)
- Very good to experience the theories in an applied situation» (Very good)
- It was very fun to see some vehicle dynamics and do some test recordings in real life!» (Very good)

Study climate

17. How is the general study climate in the master programme?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»9 75%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3.75

18. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

12 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»3 25%
Very good»8 66%
I did not seek help»1 8%

Genomsnitt: 3.83

19. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»1 7%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 15%
Very well»10 76%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.61

20. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

1 (Too low)»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»6 46%
4»7 53%
5 (Too high)»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

Summarizing questions

21. How well did the course fullfill your expectations?

13 svarande

1 (not at all)»0 0%
2»0 0%
3»2 15%
4»7 53%
5 (very well)»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- It"s better to make the assignments include some complex control strategy.» (4)

22. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»7 53%
Excellent»6 46%

Genomsnitt: 4.46

23. What is your opinion of the material selected for the exam?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 7%
Rather good»10 76%
Very good»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 3.07

24. What is your opinion of the work load during the exam?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»1 8%
Rather good»10 83%
Very good»1 8%
No opinion»1

Genomsnitt: 3

25. What is your opinion of the level of difficulty of the exam?

13 svarande

Very bad»0 0%
Rather bad»3 23%
Rather good»8 61%
Very good»2 15%
No opinion»0

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- The exam and the assignments were pretty different, so it didn"t really help during the exam that you put in so many hours for the assignments. » (Rather bad)
- Today"s paper was a little bit difficult than the previous ones. Caught us a bit.» (Rather good)
- The level of difficulty is reasonable but even though I was well prepared, did all old exams, I still didn"t do as well as I expacted and I feel that I know the subject more then it is showing on my performance of the exam. I still don"t know what I could have prepared in a better way to be able to do better on the exam. » (Rather good)
- quite challenging!» (Very good)

26. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Test Track session.»
- SimuLink»
- That Stora Holm session and those good lecture notes.»
- -Assignment -Very good lectures»
- The attention from the the exterminator and the supervisors. Very easy to get help and understanding.»
- The Lab and Assignments»
- lab at stora holm»
- storaholm lab»
- The lab at stora holm.»

27. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Teacher for problem solving»
- That assignment 4 should not be optimal task. The question about assignment 1-3 can be reduced so that students have time to do ass 4.»
- The problem solving sessions, the content is good but would have been nice with some more explaining. »
- The focus of the problem solving sessions. More focus on HOW to approach and solve promlems, how to think etc,»
- too many assignments.»
- problem solving. The sessions weren"t of much help to the understanding.»

28. Additional comments

- Over all very well structured course. »
- Thank You»
- The quality of teaching in the problem solving sessions should be improved »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.15
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.15
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.78

Kursutvärderingssystem från