|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Course Evaluation R&D Strategy and Organization, tek015Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2008-03-29 - 2008-04-15 Antal svar: 36 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51% Kontaktperson: Mats Magnusson»
1. What is your general opinion about the course?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.86 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It was challenging, and complete in the content. The lecturers where really enthusiastic about sharing their knowledge. and their teaching techniques were at an great understandable level. » (5) 2. How demanding was the course?5 = Too demanding, 4 = Very demanding, 3 = Demanding, 2 = Easy, 1 = Too easy36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.75 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 3. Did the examination form (assignments + exam) manage to check your knowledge and understanding of the contents in the course?5 = Yes, very well, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Not at all36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - To some extent, but it was more a security check that an actual assessment. it is hard to put this whole course and test it in a 4 hour exam. in the student part and the examiner part» (4) 4. What do you think about the administration of the course?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.11 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - really structured and easy to get needed information» (4) 5. What do you think about the Tidd book that was used in the course?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - really hard to judge the effect of a book on a course since we got introduce to the book months ahead of this lecture. But positive effect» (4) 6. What is your general opinion about the articles that were used in the course?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.65 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - well they were related to the topics and where cnetered around the chapters study so definitely good...» (4) 7. What do you think about the Grant book that was used in the course?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.02 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Very interesting, readable.» (?) 8. What do you think about Assignment 1 (Scenario analysis and strategy formulation)?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.97 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I really enjoyed it, and it was from creative to informative...» (5) 9. What do you think about Assignment 2 (Segmentation and product portfolio development, with ADL)?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.05 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - It was more of a case and "real life" kind of study. of course it was definitely good (4+)» (4) 10. What do you think about Assignment 3 (Organizing R&D)?5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.47 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - I just think that it would have been nice to be a bit more intensified (well or maybe have a better balance between 3 of them) which actually pushed student to focus less effort on it. maybe if the grading was made reversed ( 8,16,16) Student would have to work harder on the first one, because it is the first one... but that"s just a personal opinion..» (3) 11. Please give your opinion about the lecturers in the course. Mats Magnusson5 = Great, 4 = Good, 3 = Ok, 2 = Bad, 1 = Very bad36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.51 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 12. Martin Edlund (on diversification and new business development)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.26 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 13. Björn Axling and Johan Ström (product portfolio management)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.33 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 14. Gunnar Preifors (Managing R&D at SCA Personal Care)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.08 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 15. Christian Sandström (Managing discontinuous change)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.87 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 16. Bo Rex (Organizing R&D for exploration and exploitation)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.8 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 17. Jennie Björk (Managing knowledge, ideas and learning)36 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.53 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 18. Mattias Markusson (Innovation audits)35 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 19. How can the course be improved?- - Giving more time for assignment 2. - Providing written feedback to the groups (also the ones that did not present in class) in order to solidate the knowledge acquired during the different assignments.»- Less workload and more examination points on the assignments. Also, better supervision of the assignments with scheduled sessions.» - this course seems already well-oiled, and of course there is always sources of improvements. But for the scope that this course tries to achieve I can say that it is working well. » - I think there were too many assignments. Even if they were all good i suggest cutting out one to give more time to study the literature in a traditional way.» - maybe lower the workload a bit for the assignments.» - Not that much course material.» - Make Christian and Mats lecture more often» - Put slides on the course page before the lecture takes place. » - The course is very good but very time consuming. It is almost impossible to have groups of 7 people manage to meet for the assignments. Also we got too little feedback on the assignments.» - Think through if a written exam really are the optimum final examination. Maybe another assignment in groups but during four concentrated hours would target more of what this is all about? Otherwise, thanks for a great course» - by giving feedback on assignments by e-mail or personally» - Forex data about <a href="http://4d-elearning.com/user/view.php?id=1958&course=1">free forex quotes</a> http://4d-elearning.com/user/view.php?id=1958&course=1 [URL=http://4d-elearning.com/user/view.php?id=1958&course=1]free forex quotes[/URL]» - Exam should evaluate more the reasoning behind certain ideas, than the mere fact of memorising them.» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.13 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.28
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
27%