|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
Environmental aspects on logistics 2013, ITR361Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-05-29 - 2013-06-15 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69% Kontaktperson: Magnus Blinge» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs Klass: Övriga Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Övriga studenter
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 2. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how labour-intensive was the course?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - The repartition with approximately one deadline per week is good, the amount of work is thanks to this around the same each week, which is good.» (the same) 3. If you compare the course with other courses you have attended, how difficult was the course?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - For me it was quite difficult, but I have no environmental knowledge since before so it was a new way of thinking. However, in general it should be about the same I think, maybe a bit harder than some (but they are too easy)» (difficult) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.5 - The goals for the exam reports are hard to understand. It would be good to know what you value. Also, as there are only three of them, it is not that much times to learn from, and as you get graded on all of them it affects the results of the course quite a bit. » (The goals are difficult to understand) 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - The course content was very well matched with what I"ve learned from before. It was interesting that many things came together (purchasing, logistics, transport and even marketing). I especially liked the politics part of the course. » (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 6. Did the examination (home examination reports and case study) assess whether you have reached the goals?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.77 - The exam reports was really good, and I think this is a good way to get a better understanding of the course content. Also, as they are performed at the same time as the lectures are hold, I will remember it for a long time (not only exam studying). » (Yes, definitely) Course administrationThis section deals with the course administration.7. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.88 - too many articles, some of them don"t really fit to what we have to learn for the exam reports or the project, therefor it is not easy to find will and time to read it.» (Some extent) 8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - It would have been nice to a higher extent have access to the Power Points before the lectures in order to prepare and to take notes in a more efficient way! I understand that it can be a bit challenging for some Guest lectures, but for all other lectures it should be ok I think! » (Rather poor) 9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.33 - We"ve been able to call, email and contact the lecturer and supervisor. However I understood that our group has used this opportunity the most. Therefore, for next time it can be good with scheduled supervision.» (Rather good) LecturesThis section deals with the lectures we have had in the course. The goal is to assess the relevance of each lecture as well as the performance of the lecturer.10. Are the topics of the lectures relevant for the course?*The course addressed a lot of different topics. Below you find the list of the lectures which we have had in the course covering the different topics. What topics should be definitely be included in the course? And what topics should not be part of the course? If you did do not have an opinion or do not remember , please choose "no opinion/I do not remember"Matrisfråga - In general, I think that all lectures were very interesting (first time at Chalmers). I attended all lectures and really enjoyed them both content wise, and also as the lecturers were inspiring to listen to. I especially liked the lectures on City Logistics, and GF power, rationality and decision making was very inspiring too. PS lecture was good content wise, however not very inspiring/interactive to listen to. Also, we had almost the same lecture with POA in another course at the SCM program, so half of the group knew what he was going to talk about. In conclusion, the lecturers were very interesting. I would prefer to have some more lectures on politics and a global perspective of one of the lectures would be very interesting. » LCA of transport chains (SB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
A unifying framework for sustainable development (RB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
CEnvironmental logistics introduction (MB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Life cycle assessment –, a methodology (MB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Environmental impacts from the transport sector (MB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Alternative fuels –, Production and emissions (MB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Sustainability aspects on intermodality (SB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Environmental logistics II (MB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
City Logistics (JW)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
City Logistics (ML)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Sustainability in a fast food supply chain (PL)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Policy measures in the freight transport sector (PS)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
External costs in the transport sector (EF)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Power, rationality and decision making (GF)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Environmental strategies from a freight forwarder’,s perspective (UH)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Logistics management and the environment I+II (MHB)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Env. consideration when purchasing transport services (MBj)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
CSR in SCM –,,, Socially responsible logistics (MBj)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
Environmental strategies from a transport companies perspective / ITS (POA)* (på denna fråga var det möjligt att välja flera svarsalternativ)
11. How was the lecturer*Please judge the quality of the lecture. Do you think that the lecturer has a good knowledge of the topic? Was he motivated, interested and committed? If you did not attend or do not remember any lecture, please choose "I did not attend the lecture/I do not remember".Matrisfråga Sönke Behrends - LCA on transport chains*
Genomsnitt: 4 Richard Blume - A unifying framework for sustainable d.*
Genomsnitt: 4 Magnus Blinge - Environmental logistics*
Genomsnitt: 4.55 Magnus Blinge - LCA a methodology*
Genomsnitt: 4.55 Magnus Blinge - Env impact from transport*
Genomsnitt: 4.55 Magnus Blinge - Alternative fuels*
Genomsnitt: 4.33 Sönke Behrends - Sustainability aspects on intermodality*
Genomsnitt: 3.87 John Wedel - City logistics*
Genomsnitt: 4.75 Maria Lindolm - Sustainability aspects on city logistics*
Genomsnitt: 4.5 Per Larshans - Sustainability in a fast food supply chain*
Genomsnitt: 4.14 Petra Stelling - Policy measures in the freight transport sector*
Genomsnitt: 2.5 Erik Fridell - External costs in the transport sector*
Genomsnitt: 4.44 Maria Huge-Brodin - Logistics management and the environment*
Genomsnitt: 4.11 Maria Huge-Brodin - Environmentally and logistics based business models*
Genomsnitt: 4.11 Maria Björklund - Environmental considerations when purchas.*
Genomsnitt: 3.66 Maria Björklund - CSR in SCM*
Genomsnitt: 3.66 Gunnar Falkenmark - Power, rationality and decision making..*
Genomsnitt: 4.44 Ulf Hammerberg (DHL) - Environmental strategies from a freight forwarder’,,,s perspective*
Genomsnitt: 3.77 P-O Arnäs - Environmental strategies from a transport companies perspective*
Genomsnitt: 3.77 Claes Boman - Case study guidence*
Genomsnitt: 4 12. On which topic (related to the course content) would you have wished to get a guest lecture by an external expert?- Altenative fuel»- Globalization and transport. Both how globalization affects transports, but also how the situation looks like in different areas of the world. » - reverse logistics» - LCA, maybe a consultant» 13. How many of the offered lectures did you attend?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - Attended everything.» (75-100%) 14. What were the reasons for not attending a lecture?8 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.87 - Scheduling with other group work where I had to prioritize. » (There was a time conflict with other courses) Examination reportsThis section deals with the examination reports. First, questions on the examination reports in general are stated, followed by questions for each examination report.15. In comparison to an exam at the end of the course, how well are the examination reports in general for achieving the course objectives?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.88 - it permit to go deeper in our knowledge of the topic, a few days after seeing it. An exam at the end doesn"t have this.» (very good) 16. Was it beneficial for your learning that you needed to work together with different partners?*9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - Yes and no. I would have liked doing it myself as well. It depends with whom you work with I guess. It is good to work together with new people, however, it is important that you want to reach the same goals. This can be hard sometimes. » (neutral) 17. How was the workload for the examination reports in general?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.11 - It was okay, but that does not mean I put in 30h effort (since they were 15P/100P), but maybe 20 hours in total. But I guess that depends on who you ask. I must say however that the grading of the exam reports can be questioned,
The instructions states some specific questions, and by answering them in a good way you should receive no penalty. But when you get the report back from Blinge, he has his own way of correcting the reports, for example using "problem description", which is not always explicitly stated in the instruction of the assignment. Blinge then gives some points penalty to something not asked for by the "CEO" in the assignment. I think it should be stated more clearly!» (okay) 18. How well did the administration, e.g. handouts, handins, etc work?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4 - See Q8» (rather poor) 19. Examination report 1 - Env. Tools & concepts,. Env. impacts and technical solutions/ transport modesMatrisfråga- This was the hardest one. It was hard to understand what the goal was, and as it was the first one we didn"t have any routine doing it. It might be good to have a clearer goal for the first one. Maybe even have four instead of three, and make the two first one easier, just to get used to it maybe. » How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 2.66 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.22 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.66 20. Examination report 2 - City LogisticsMatrisfråga- This was my favourite one. I really enjoyed the subject and it was interesting to read all articles. » How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 2.88 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.11 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.11 21. Examination report 3 - External effects, policy measures and economic means of control.Matrisfråga- This was also very interesting. We read a lot for this one, and this really kind of summarized the course in a good way. I really enjoyed writing this one!» How relevant was the examination report for achieving the goals?
Genomsnitt: 2.66 How was the workload compared to the relevance (maximum points given) of the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.22 How difficult was the examination report?
Genomsnitt: 2.22 22. What do you think was the best with the examination reports?- the second»- Learning outcome! Hard work, but I learned a lot from doing them!» - The time we had to finishing it» - you start thinking about it and not only reading or learning by heart. By telling the story on your own the effect of learning is improved» - It really increased my learning and made me aware of the assigned issues.» - To become "expert" on different interesting areas regarding environmental issues and logistics - and that it was directed towards the management.» - A much better way to learn than studying for an end exam» - That you had to find the articles and even though the report itself was hinting you towards a direction you still had different ways to interpret the assignment» - Working with someone else, digging into litterature, into one subject, comparing different authors» 23. What do you think was the worst with the examination reports?- the first»- Hard to know what the goals were. Felt like a lottery. » - Knowing exactly what to focus on the answers» - to have the right degree of detail» - Very hard to know in before hand how the reports would be assessed» - -» - TO find the literature. Maybe more recommended literature would be helpful» - The grading uncertainty, you felt that it did not matter WHAT you wrote, that the main thing was whether Blinge liked the report (which was hard to know in advance)» Case studyThis section deals with the case study work.24. How relevant was the case study for achieving the course goals?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.33 - Very fun and more relaxed way of learning than the exam reports, good mix. » (much) 25. How was the workload for the case study?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.66 - The work load was quite high, but our group worked really well and we all enjoyed doing it. » (much) 26. How well did the administration, e.g. guidance, handins, etc work?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.88 - As we called and emailed Claes several times it worked fine for our group. But in some cases it could have been better with some more guidance eg. instructions regarding presentations and opposition report» (neutral) 27. What do you think was the best with the case study?- the fact that we worked on real cases, real companies.»- To meet a real company and understand what they value. It was also very interesting to connect what we have learned with strategy and the financial part. » - Learning about what companies actually focus on Nowadays» - getting experience in project work with people from many different countries involved I didn"t know before» - The best was to work with real case studies» - To get to connect environmental issues to strategy, very interesting and I"ve learned a lot from it. » - That we actually got to do the calculations and develop a good understanding of how the methodology is to be used» - THe minor deadlines that made you work with the project throughout the period» - Working with a real company, seeing a real need, and thereby feeling like a real consultant» 28. What do you think was the worst with the case study?- the calculations were a bit painfull be necessary to unerstand better.»- Hard to know how it will be valued. We have not got it graded yet, so early to know about that. » - Understand if a calculated number is big or small» - find time slots for group meetings» - It was difficult to do calculations for rail since there was no example» - The deadline with the opposition report etc. Could have been better planned and communicated. » Summarizing questions29. What is your general impression of the course?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.44 - Between good and excellent» (Good) 30. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- the case study with the real companies»- Lectures very good! Case study very good! Exam reports also good, but goal can be clearer. » - Time windows for home report and also keep just having 3 reports» - case study with real cases» - To use real companies in the case studies, the lecture by TNS and Huge-Brodin» - All the interesting guest lectures.» - The exam reports and the case study» - Having real case companies» - Everything!» 31. What should definitely be changed to next year?- the lecture of the 2 Maria»- Goal of exam reports. » - Maybe more meetings about the lca studies, to get information if one "goes in right" direction » - I would like to get a better feeling of the numbers. Is 1 kg CO2 much or little. Maybe see some more examples where an improvement of the environmental impact is a financial improvement for the company at the same time.» - -» - To have powerpoints handed out prior to lectures for better notes. » - Timing of lectures» 32. Can you recommend others to attend this course?9 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1 - Really interesting. This course really made me interested in the subject!» (Yes) 33. Additional comments- Having real case companies is a great change from last year, and the idea to have small companies is also good. However, Kning Disk was in my opinion too small, with only one person working with it and with more or less no profit. It was hard to apply several topics for the company, change management etc. It was a challenge and fun to work with Kning disk, I learnt a lot, but yet, the size of the company should be more appropriate in accordance with the assignment. Overall, the course was one of the best during my master studies so far!»* obligatoriska frågor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0%