Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Autonomous agents 2013 part B: Robot construction, FFR125

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-29 - 2013-06-07
Antal svar: 19
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 63%
Kontaktperson: Krister Wolff»
Klass: Övriga

1. How do you rate the disposition of the robotics construction part (eight weeks, two mandatory assignments to demonstrate)?

19 svarande

Very good»8 42%
Good»11 57%
No opinion»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The initial deadline for the first project was too short, but this was changed after some complaints.» (Good)

2. Are the teaching goals of the robotics project clear to you?

19 svarande

Very clear»1 5%
Clear»14 73%
No opinion»4 21%
Unclear»0 0%
Very unclear»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.15 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- There were at times some problems to access (and find) the homepage.» (Clear)

3. How do you rate the level of difficulty of Assignment 1 (Mine sweeper)?

19 svarande

Very difficult»0 0%
Difficult»0 0%
No opinion»2 10%
Easy»17 89%
Very easy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.89 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Perfect for people with little to none previous experience in programming, » (Easy)
- It was quite easy, but considering there was not much time I think it"s okey.» (Easy)
- Appropriate difficulty, I would choose moderately if that would be an option.» (Easy)
- Easy but adequate.» (Easy)

4. How do you rate the level of difficulty of Assignment 2 (Search and rescue)?

19 svarande

Very difficult»1 5%
Difficult»15 78%
No opinion»3 15%
Easy»0 0%
Very easy»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

- Hard to achieve good and robust performance, due to many different possible states. Also due to including many sensors.» (Difficult)
- It was way harder to implement a "smart" solution to the actual problem. A good solution would be the one where it finds one object and returns this to the safe-zone, before collecting a new one, rather than just delivering 4 at once.» (Difficult)
- A bit tricky, but never felt that it would be an unreachable goal! Very fun» (Difficult)

5. How did you like Assignment 1 (Mine sweeper)?

19 svarande

Very good»6 31%
Good»13 68%
No opinion»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- luck played a big part in the competition, so the smartest robot did perhabs not win. » (Good)
- It was a good introduction» (Good)

6. How did you like Assignment 2 (Search and rescue)?

19 svarande

Very good»7 36%
Good»11 57%
No opinion»1 5%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- This task is on the edge of complexity. When introducing the assignment, you should emphasize that the robot should be able to move good without the IR beacon in sight, since the beacon was harder than expected to spot.» (Good)

7. How did you like to work with the Robotics shield kit and the Arduino Uno microcontroller?

19 svarande

Very much»8 42%
Much»11 57%
No opinion»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.57

- Very easy to work with. Saves a lot of time when there"s libraries for setting motors and pulsing LEDs etc.» (Very much)
- Good tutorials both in the BoE shield and arduino! » (Very much)
- really smoth, easy to program with the arduino std library. only limitation hit for the arduino in our group was the number of external interupt pins(2). speed and memory-wise sufficient for the projects» (Very much)
- Arduino code is pleasent to work with. The kit was easy to build and had sufficient room to add sensors and such.» (Much)

8. To what extent have the robotics project increased your ability to work in a team?

18 svarande

Very much»1 5%
Much»5 27%
No opinion»4 22%
Little»6 33%
Very little»2 11%

Genomsnitt: 3.16 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I was already familiar with my group memebers, which is both positive and negative in a learning standpoint.» (No opinion)
- Our group could argue a bit too much, and my team members wasnt always active, or when they was, they was kind of ego, and wanted everything their way.. » (Little)
- I guess it all depends of the team» (Very little)
- Had a not so good group, was actually more like two groups in one» (Very little)

9. Do the teachers provide enough support for the students to carry out the robotics project in the course?

19 svarande

Too much»0 0%
Yes»10 52%
No opinion»4 21%
To little»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.73 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- More access to a lab would help a lot. Not everybody has tools to work with and having to rely on somebody being in the lab was not efficient and no chance on deciding on meeting time ahead of time.» (No opinion)
- Course webpage nearly impossible to find. Lack of tools and equiptment. Barely functioning beacon.» (To little)
- More time for supervision and access to material and equipment felt needed. » (To little)

10. Was there enough time (March 20 to May 29), in your opinion, to carry out the Robotics project activity (part B of Autonomous Agents)?

19 svarande

Yes, absolutely!»2 10%
Yes, more or less»16 84%
No opinion»0 0%
No, a little to little»1 5%
No, much to little!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- If unlimited access to a lab where provided,the time would be easily enough. » (Yes, more or less)

11. How much time per week (approximately) did you spend on the robotics project (including everything)?

19 svarande

Less than 4 hours»0 0%
Between 4 and 8 hours»15 78%
8 to 16 hours»3 15%
16 to 32 hours»1 5%
More than 32 hours»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.26

- ~ 15-20» (16 to 32 hours)

12. What is your general impression of the Robotics project activity?

19 svarande

Very good»4 21%
Good»15 78%
Neutral»0 0%
Bad»0 0%
Very bad»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

- Nice to use the theoretical knowledge from the first part of the course.» (Very good)

13. Would you recomend this course to other students?

19 svarande

Yes, absolutely!»7 36%
Yes»11 57%
No opinion»1 5%
No»0 0%
No, absolutely not!»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.68 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Too much work for a 7.5 credits course.» (No opinion)

14. What additions or changes (if any) would you like to see in the Robotics project part?

- Maybe create a training Arena earlier into project 2. »
- more time in the lab»
- None actually. It was good that the first competition was delayed one week, it would"ve been much more stressful otherwise. I recommend that this is done the following years aswell.»
- I would like to have a more enviromental friendly project with rechargeable batteries, as for now it is very unresponsible to use non-rechargable batteries. This is a BIG minus for the project. The best would be to use a Li-Po cell instead of regular batteries. This would also help a lot for the project itself since it was really annoying with batteries that lost power.»
- Students should be able to borrow at least one of the cylinders, to allow work off hours. Same goes for the beacon. The way it was set up on the last day was good. If it had been up every day for the last week that would have been great.»
- I experienced a lack of construction material and of tools. Also it would be great to have a lab that was always avaliable or avaliable at more times.»
- More building material!»

15. General comments and suggestions about the Robotics project part (if any):

- Provide shrink-tubing, tape, etc. »
- For the first assignment (Mine Sweeper), it would have been nice to be able to "see" walls and use them before For the second assignment, a lot of groups got problems with IR reflecting on the wood. Also it would have been nice to be able to work more with the beacon, or any IR emettor»
- If the teacher would speak english all the time it would probably be easier for the non-swedish-speaking. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.31

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.31
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.34

Kursutvärderingssystem från