ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Building physics, advanced course, VBF021

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2008-03-31 - 2008-04-14
Antal svar: 4
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50%
Kontaktperson: Björn Engström»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

4 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»4 100%
Around 25 hours/week»0 0%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

4 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»2 50%
100%»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- almost at least» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. To what extent did you reach the following goal? After the course the student should be able to carry out advanced calcuations concerning transfer and storage of heat and mositure in buildings.

4 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»2 50%
80-100%»2 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.5

- i need to practise more on calculations but i don"t blame the course for this (my basic knowledge was to rusty)» (60-80%)

4. To what extent did you reach the following goal? After the course the student should have a deeper understanding of building physics design and of principles for constructing thermal envelopes.

4 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»1 25%
80-100%»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

5. To what extent did you reach the following goal? After the course the student should be able to formulate, model and solve problems including heat, air and moisture transfer in buildings.

4 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»1 25%
80-100%»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.75

- At least I hope so.» (80-100%)

6. To what extent did you reach the following goal? After the course the student should be able to evaluate formualted problems, theoretical models and calcuation results.

4 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»0 0%
60-80%»4 100%
80-100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

- It can be a compicated thing that needs more training but I"ve got a good start.» (60-80%)

7. How understandable are the course goals?

4 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 25%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

8. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

4 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

9. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

4 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»0 0%
Yes, definitely»4 100%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and course administration

10. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 25%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

11. To what extent has the the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

4 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 100%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

- But the book is difficult to read sometimes, not sure but have a feeling that quite a lot is written in Swenglish which makes the sentences hard to follow.» (Large extent)

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»1 25%
Very well»3 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

Study climate

13. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

4 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»1 25%
Very good»3 75%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

14. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

4 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»2 50%
Very well»2 50%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- We havn"t worked a lot together but they are nice.» (Rather well)

15. How was the course workload?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 100%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

16. How was the total workload this study period?

4 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
High»3 75%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- The acoustic course was difficult and took a lot of time.» (High)

Summarizing questions

17. What is your general impression of the course?

4 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»1 25%
Good»3 75%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- probably the best course I taken at Chalmers» (Good)

18. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The discussions of problems with the whole class»
- The practical focus»

19. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Stress the need for calculation skills»

20. Additional comments

- It was good that the HEAT problems were not compulsory»

Kursutvärderingssystem från