Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPDES 1213 LP4 Course Evaluation: Advanced form design 2, PPU101
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-06-07 - 2013-09-15 Antal svar: 9 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 69% Kontaktperson: Björn Friberg»
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.9 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 1 | | 11% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 22% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 6 | | 66% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.55 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 9 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 0 | | 0% |
75%» | | 1 | | 11% |
100%» | | 8 | | 88% |
Genomsnitt: 4.88
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?9 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 1 | | 11% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 5 | | 55% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.9 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 88% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 1 | | 11% |
Genomsnitt: 2.11 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?9 svarande
No, not at all» | | 2 | | 22% |
To some extent» | | 3 | | 33% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 22% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 2.44 - Hard to establish who that really made the assesment since the main examinator usually was not present in the thaught classes.» (To some extent)
Teaching and course administration6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 22% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - Very varied between the different lectures. Guest lecturers were really good! The rest were not so good. Often didn"t feel very well planned. » (Some extent)
- but some teaching has ben totally unnecessarily ..for instance the one about metaphors .. and about infographics since there was no actual teaching, instead we had a discussion in class whats good and bad about it. Since we had to make infographics which was graded, it would have been nice to have something in general about infographics from the teachers point of view» (Large extent)
7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?9 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 44% |
Large extent» | | 5 | | 55% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.55 - Articles were intresting » (Large extent)
- However I found the material mostly useful in other areas than the specific tasks offered in the course. In short the information was good and useful but maybe not completely synchronized with the layout of this course. » (Large extent)
8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?9 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 7 | | 77% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 22% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22
Study climate9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?9 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 11% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 55% |
Very good» | | 3 | | 33% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.22 - I think it was rather hard to get some clear answers from the teachers. It feelted like it was up me and indvidual to come up with the answers of my questions. » (Rather poor)
- The opportunities for asking questions were good, although the answers were mostly not helping that much. Please have your goals more clear so that we are able to know what is expected for us to do!» (Rather good)
- Jag ställde många frågor men tyckte dock inte att svaren var till hjälp. » (Rather good)
10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?9 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 44% |
Very well» | | 5 | | 55% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.55 11. How was the course workload?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 55% |
High» | | 4 | | 44% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.44 - good overall, but a lot of reporting» (Adequate)
12. How was the total workload this study period?9 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 11% |
High» | | 5 | | 55% |
Too high» | | 3 | | 33% |
Genomsnitt: 4.22 - i only took one course» (Adequate)
Summarizing questions13. What is your general impression of the course?9 svarande
Poor» | | 2 | | 22% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 11% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 22% |
Good» | | 4 | | 44% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.88 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Jag hade velat att lärarna var mer engagerade och gav mer information om vad som skulle kunna förbättra resultatet. Jag hade lika gärna kunnat sitta själv och testa olika former och design på produkter. » (Poor)
- Unfortunately, there are too many negative aspects of this course. » (Adequate)
- I really liked this course even though it was sad to hear that others did not. Sometimes that led to unpleasant discussions of cours goals rather then discussions of form. In addition the teachers sometimes had attitudes towards the students that we were not intrested or engaged in our work which was not true and contribute to the unpleasantness of The class. » (Good)
14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The articles and the weekly reflections. The guest teachers most of them anyway. I did not specifically like the Volvo guy presentation. The weekly crit sessions. »
- The porcelain project. But with som more explanation on the goals of the result from the beginning.»
- Guest lecturers! And the project. »
- The "crit sessions"»
15. What should definitely be changed to next year?- I liked the content of the course it is rather the attitudes of students and teachers that should change. Well maybe The infographic. For me they were time consuming and did not really give that much. Maybe they could be started during ā workshop were you could discuss and decide its content and variables. More related to your own infographic rather than others. More hands on workshop. »
- The order of the literature, workshops and methods. Understand that it must be hard too syncronize completly, but if they were to be, this course could be one of the most logical and giving.»
- The communication between students and teachers need to be better, and the effort made by the teachers! We get to know that we are doing things wrong all the time, while we never get any clear descriptions on what we are supposed to do, even though we ask and really try! Shape up, please, this course has potential but as it is now it is not working well. »
- A more varied approach to workshops and seminars, maybe acquire one day workdays for work and tryouts. Working in other physical environments and more study trips. »
16. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.88
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.88 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.47
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|