Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

International Business Relationships, TEK360

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-29 - 2013-06-12
Antal svar: 14
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 60%
Kontaktperson: Anneli Hildenborg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

14 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 35%
Around 20 hours/week»7 50%
Around 25 hours/week»2 14%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.78

- Some weeks more then other» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

14 svarande

0%»1 7%
25%»4 28%
50%»6 42%
75%»3 21%
100%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.78

- As discussed: colliding lectures. As I had previous knowledge in the course subject I had to prioritise the parallel course, which one was a quite difficult one.» (0%)
- Would have wanted to attend more but it clashed.» (25%)
- It was really hard to attend classes since I had to attend other classes» (25%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

14 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 7%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 7%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.14

- It took me a while to realize that this course had a large supply chain mgm "focus". » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

13 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»2 15%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»10 76%
No, the goals are set too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 1.92

- This subject was totally new for me so I believe that I learned a lot of new things. However I believe that this course was harder for me then for the students that already studied the subject...» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

13 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»5 38%
Yes, definitely»6 46%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.53

- There was a clear bias towards the theory part of one certain group. This is one of several impressions that this certain group has been treated with favor, which of course is not acceptable.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»7 50%
Large extent»5 35%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.21

- More guiding what to learn, than actually teaching.» (Small extent)
- Missed a lot of lectures but what I got out from those I attended was good. » (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material (not project assignment) been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»2 14%
Some extent»1 7%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3

- Important for the exam Yes, learning none!» (Small extent)
- I think It is really good with the articles instead of having a book. I learn more from comparing perspectives» (Great extent)

8. To what extent has the project assignment been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»1 7%
Some extent»2 14%
Large extent»6 42%
Great extent»5 35%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

- It was a little bit complicated for me since this was the first time I had to write this kind of report and my group memebers already knew how to do it since they have studied the subject..» (Large extent)
- doing is an essential part of the learning on a course like this» (Great extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

14 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»6 42%
Very well»7 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- very good with information» (Rather well)
- A bit many e-mails and clarifications perhaps.» (Rather well)
- Sometimes it was hard to follow all the emails, maybe pingpong should have been used more» (Very well)

--- Specific lectures ---

It is also useful for us if you can provide feedback on specific lectures, whether in terms of content, administration or other aspects. This helps us learn which lectures to include, which lecture formats are most appreciated, and allows us to communicate results to our external lecturers, who are almost always interested in hearing how their lecture went. Try to comment on as many lectures as you can.

Appreciate on a scale 1 (low appreciation) - 5 (high appreciation) the combined competency and pedagogy of the following lecturers:

10. Course introduction (Viktoria Sundquist)

11 svarande

1 9%
0 0%
3 27%
4 36%
3 27%

Genomsnitt: 3.72

11. Business relationships and networks (Viktoria Sundquist)

12 svarande

0 0%
1 8%
6 50%
3 25%
2 16%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

- could have put more discussion on the articles around the team.» (4)

12. Internationalization (Viktoria Sundquist)

11 svarande

0 0%
1 9%
5 45%
4 36%
1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

13. Business models in international markets (Lars Bankvall and Frida Lind, Chalmers)

10 svarande

1 10%
1 10%
2 20%
3 30%
3 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Good with the applied pedagogy» (5)

14. Sourcing in a new context (Nojan Najafi, Chalmers)

13 svarande

0 0%
2 15%
5 38%
3 23%
3 23%

Genomsnitt: 3.53

- I felt like there where to different levels on the class for this lecture and I think it became a bit flat. » (3)
- The smaller assignment for Nojan was interesting, as well as the presentations was giving. Sadly it was only two groups attending. I did however not attend the lectures in the subject, which of course was a loss.» (5)

15. Cross cultural issues (Viktoria Sundquist)

10 svarande

1 10%
0 0%
3 30%
4 40%
2 20%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- This was the only lecture that I attended. It was interesting and valuable and it made me feel I really missed out on the lectures that I did not attend.» (5)

16. Internationalization by developing customer relationships (Roger Schweizer, Gothenburg Business School)

9 svarande

1 11%
2 22%
1 11%
3 33%
2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

- I think this lecture was really good and it gave me a much deeper perspective on the theme and its two articles.» (5)

Study climate

17. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 15%
Very good»11 84%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.84

- I would say beyond exceptional» (Very good)

18. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

14 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 7%
Rather well»9 64%
Very well»4 28%

Genomsnitt: 3.21

- I think we had some cross cultural issues within the group» (Rather poorly)

19. How was the course workload?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 14%
Adequate»10 71%
High»2 14%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

20. How was the total workload this study period?

14 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»8 57%
High»4 28%
Too high»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

- This is a composition of two courses and CSE-related activities. » (Too high)

Summarizing questions

21. What is your general impression of the course?

14 svarande

Poor»1 7%
Fair»1 7%
Adequate»2 14%
Good»8 57%
Excellent»2 14%

Genomsnitt: 3.64 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Zero information on exam. Articles was useless and the coordination for the project was catastrophic. No help at all from teacher in planning trip and etc. Lousy mail response from teachers. » (Poor)

22. What is your general impression of the lectures and assignments in lectures (not project assignment)?

14 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»2 14%
Adequate»6 42%
Good»5 35%
Excellent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 3.35

23. What is your general impression of the project assignment?

13 svarande

Poor»2 15%
Fair»0 0%
Adequate»2 15%
Good»4 30%
Excellent»5 38%

Genomsnitt: 3.76

- Grading. Never seen one group on 25 points while another reaches 48 without even making rqs or interview questions.» (Poor)
- Gave nothing» (Poor)
- Also at the project assignment part it gave the impression that a certain group has been treated with favor, specifically during grading, which of course is not acceptable.» (Good)
- Pease keep this as a central part of the course! Brilliant!» (Excellent)

24. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- excurions to "real life" companies»
- Project assignment»
- Project work Assignments Structure of the lectures »
- ^^»
- The course code»
- The funding of course, it is great to have that possibility. also the themes structure is good.»
- the project assignment & the budget»

25. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Please try to fix the schedule with specific (compulsory) dates (e.g. presentations) at the beginning of the first reading session !!!! »
- Maybe drop the last theme (internationalization by developing custumer relationship), too close to the theme internationaization»
- Assignments in the beginning of the course, not in the end, when the project work has to be finished. Less or shorter articles.»
- The course schedule - take slot E or D to make sure student can attend the lectures. Do also put some pressure on the students to attend by mandatory events such as presentations and seminars.»
- a lot. The exam needs to be introduced a lot better. And we need to know how the teacher grades the questions on exam. And how the questions are put together. At this moment you could be asking us anything and grade us upon anything with no "standards" »
- I think the cross cultural issues became quite obvious and embedded to a high degree in many of the other themes, does it have to be a self standing theme. »
- Give everyone or noone, who wants to travel, the opportunity to do so.»
- Reduce number of papers, only include really relevant ones and make clear what their message is. Spend less time organizing the course during the lectures (focus on themes during lecture time), publish all information in the beginning of the course if possible. Spend less time on really easy basics and more on discussion of implications and current research. Instead of having the easy things in lectures and the difficult things in literature, give basics to read and have discussions about case studies, theories etc. in lectures. Don"t have deadlines for theoretical frameworks before the respective lectures. Have pre-deadline for project reports so that errors can be corrected by project groups, be very strict about content and language at this point. Generally, make more clear what learning goals are. If there is not enough relevant theory (most things were a bit obvious) bringing more case studies would make the course more interesting. Make people come to lectures by rewards or punishments.»

26. Additional comments

- I liked the course and learned some things. However I think that it has more potential if the lectures focus more on getting across knowledge, the papers are selected more precisely and clearer instructions are given. The project assignment is great and it"s good that it has such a big part in the course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.64

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.64
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.66

Kursutvärderingssystem från