Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPAME/Course evaluation 2013- Material mechanics, MHA042

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-31 - 2013-10-09
Antal svar: 7
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 25%
Kontaktperson: Johan Bankel»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

7 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 14%
Around 20 hours/week»3 42%
Around 25 hours/week»2 28%
Around 30 hours/week»1 14%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.42

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

7 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 28%
75%»2 28%
100%»3 42%

Genomsnitt: 4.14

- Stopped going to lectures after the second week. » (50%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

7 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 14%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 14%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 42%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»6 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

6 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 66%
Yes, definitely»1 16%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 16%

Genomsnitt: 2.5

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»4 57%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

7 svarande

Small extent»2 28%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»3 42%
Great extent»2 28%

Genomsnitt: 2.71

- Big difference between lecture material and course material(better).» (Large extent)
- The Primer was a beast! » (Great extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

7 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»2 28%
Rather well»4 57%
Very well»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

- You had to go to about four different pages on the web page to summarize what chapter of the books you should read for each lecture. » (Rather badly)
- The structure of the course web page could be improved! » (Rather well)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

7 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 28%
Very good»5 71%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.71

- Rebecka saved my life! She is the reason I stayed on this course when it got difficult or confusing.» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

7 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»1 14%
Rather well»2 28%
Very well»4 57%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

11. How was the course workload?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»4 57%
High»3 42%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.42

12. How was the total workload this study period?

7 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 14%
High»6 85%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

7 svarande

Poor»2 28%
Fair»1 14%
Adequate»1 14%
Good»3 42%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.71 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The lectures and litterature was not very consistent when it came to notations and things like that. It is also difficult to keep the different models separated when talking about them, more visualization or clearer parallells to actual materials and cases would be helpful. » (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments were good, the dugga aswell. »
- The contents of the assignments! »
- The assignment works.»
- Rebecka Bromeson»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The layout of the lecture notes. »
- More assignments and less time for each assignment. I mean, the time to complete CA2 was way too long. Also, the structure of the lecture notes must be improved. »
- More clear lectures!»

16. Additional comments

- None»
- I"m going structural engineering and found this course very bad from my perspective. A lot of things were assumed that I should know that I did not and the info about this problem was bad. The relevance for me seemed low as well so I was disappointed at the course in general...»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.71

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.71
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.42

Kursutvärderingssystem från