Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPDES 1213 LP4 Course Evaluation: Project Industrial Design Engineering, PPU095

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-07 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 16
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 51%
Kontaktperson: Björn Friberg»

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

16 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»0 0%
Around 20 hours/week»0 0%
Around 25 hours/week»5 31%
Around 30 hours/week»8 50%
At least 35 hours/week»3 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.87

- Sometimes more.. Depending on if we had deadlines soon or not. But never less than 25 h/week.» (Around 25 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

16 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 6%
50%»0 0%
75%»3 18%
100%»12 75%

Genomsnitt: 4.62

- There were no teaching? » (25%)
- Some meetings with companies clashed» (75%)
- Not that much teaching in this course, mostly supervisor meetings» (75%)
- Other than some DVD seminars there wasn"t really a teaching aspect to this course» (100%)
- Missed one video so probably about 90%» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

15 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»3 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 6%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»8 53%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.73

- never got to see any goals in the beginning of course..» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- it was very hard to get a grip on what should be in the report, as well as to get everything specified to fit into it!» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- The requirements for the report were changed many times. And I believe we needed more guidelines from our supervisor/instructor. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
- Depended also to a certain extant on the desires and requirements of our client.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

15 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»15 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

14 svarande

No, not at all»1 7%
To some extent»10 71%
Yes, definitely»3 21%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.14

- I think some of the scoring point were odd. Especially about the report. » (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

16 svarande

Small extent»7 43%
Some extent»8 50%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 1.68

- No teaching?? » (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

14 svarande

Small extent»7 50%
Some extent»5 35%
Large extent»2 14%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.64

- None provided» (?)
- Difficult question to answer. We didn"t get any literature, but I guess we could use literature from other courses. » (?)
- What litterature?» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

16 svarande

Very badly»5 31%
Rather badly»4 25%
Rather well»7 43%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.12

- even if you think some manner is better than the other, you don"t go a head and change your decision right in the middle of the course! it should not be possible due to the course pm should state exactly how you should examine the course, and because it didnt you got your loop whole. but it is not fair to anyone taking the course.. » (Very badly)
- Information regarding final report, provided very late. » (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

16 svarande

Very poor»1 6%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»8 50%
Very good»6 37%
I did not seek help»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

16 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 25%
Very well»12 75%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

11. How was the course workload?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 12%
High»13 81%
Too high»1 6%

Genomsnitt: 3.93

- but fun!» (High)
- We didn"t have time to do mentoring (that where a part of the course) at all. There simply where no time. If you want to keep that system, you have to think again on the workload.» (High)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

16 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»2 12%
High»12 75%
Too high»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 4

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

16 svarande

Poor»2 12%
Fair»1 6%
Adequate»2 12%
Good»9 56%
Excellent»2 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.5 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Whilst the purpose of the course is great allowing students to put theory into practice by working directly with industry, the organisation was very poor and lacked professionalism. With presentation dates frequently being changed, the final report requirements being changed late in the day with no clear direction as to what examiners were looking for and supervisor meetings didn"t really aid students at all in my opinion.» (Poor)
- Nice to have projects» (Good)
- Depends to a large extent on the commitment of your client and those that work for the project» (Good)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- »
- Company collaborations»
- group work and choosing own topic»
- The field trips. »
- The client bond.»
- the project work, the handlers, the half presentations.. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Clear directioins on the report. It should be either an academic or a non-academic report. not something in between.»
- Structure the tasks and goal as well as the criteria. Don"t send out just two, three or five different messages with different contents describing things. There should be one clear message, and it should not change much, and at least not 5 times over a short period. Only pick well defined tasks within our area from companies,»
- Organisation, assement requirements should be made clearer and more distinct roles for what supervisor should do and the expectations the students have of the supervisor and vice versa»
- I would like to have compulsory attendance at the last presentation. »
- supervising meetings need to have better foundation, did not get very much from them»
- The report focus. It should go back to result focused. »
- Feedback and supervising, and instructions for report!»
- The report structure, need to be feasible. All parties need to have decided what they want and how that will be presented before the course starts.»
- the course pm should clearly state how yo intend to examine the students. and say in before hand how you want to have the report!!»
- Inform students with longer notice about what is to be expected of them in the final assessment.»

16. Additional comments

- »
- Redo correctly, this course was horribly managed»
- The final grading should have been done in a more professional manner with each group sitting down with both the supervisor and examiner to discuss the outcome taking into consideration the direction and desires of the client. Since each project was very different with some students being given a product to develop and others starting from nothing it feels us»
- how the report of the project should be like was changed very late into the course and this was very confusing and since be had a different approach in the beginning we had to reconstruct a lot of work. More feedback on the work at the moment, for instance with the meeting with the supervisor. Perhaps the supervisor could attend to some sessions. »
- Despite the comments on the administration and such, I did like this course.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.5

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.5
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.62

Kursutvärderingssystem från