Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

V13 - Production project course, IAR058

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-28 - 2013-08-29
Antal svar: 10
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 24%
Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

10 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 10%
Around 20 hours/week»5 50%
Around 25 hours/week»1 10%
Around 30 hours/week»3 30%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.6

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

10 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»2 20%
75%»4 40%
100%»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- only mandatory» (50%)
- All that was "mandatory". Hope I don"t have to anyone during the fall since I want to work with the project.» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

10 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»2 20%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 10%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»4 40%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- Could, and should be stated MUCH clearer! Especially hard to determine what you want to get from the personal reflections.» (I have not seen/read the goals)
- Is the purpose to make a project plan or to read books, study LIPS model and attend boring group dynamic lectures that all Chalmers students have done at least 2 times before. » (The goals are difficult to understand)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

9 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not concerning what you have achieved on the projects but since there is a lot of other things is seems reasonable.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

9 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 55%
Yes, definitely»4 44%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

- But as always in group projects its hard to determine who have done what. But more personal assignments wouldn"t be efficient since the project takes a lot of time. » (Yes, definitely)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»8 80%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.4

- No extent. Probably the worst teaching I have attendent during my years at Chalmers. » (Small extent)
- None at all» (Small extent)
- Sometimes it felt like the lessons was there without any reason, more like "just because"» (Small extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»4 40%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»2 20%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- Since we are forced to use the Lips model that book is a help, but I believe that you should be able to choose your own model. The reflection book was a lot of empty phrases, and it didn"t help me in any sense.» (Small extent)
- Not at all» (Small extent)

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

10 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 40%
Rather well»4 40%
Very well»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- There were a lot of information on diffrent places, course PM, in the hand in folders on PingPong etc. More strict communication flow would be feasible.» (Rather badly)
- It was not clear where to find the right documents, that was not a big problem but something that could be done better» (Rather badly)
- A lot of pingpong problems» (Rather badly)

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

10 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 20%
Very good»8 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The teachers have been very helpfull and easy to reach (mail and personal meetings)» (Very good)
- The sponsor and the supervisor was very good» (Very good)

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

10 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 10%
Very well»9 90%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.9

11. How was the course workload?

10 svarande

Too low»1 10%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»9 90%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- It was the right amount according to the weekly workload of 25h» (Adequate)

12. How was the total workload this study period?

10 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»5 50%
High»4 40%
Too high»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

- Some weeks more some weeks less» (Adequate)

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

10 svarande

Poor»4 40%
Fair»1 10%
Adequate»3 30%
Good»1 10%
Excellent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- A bad course that doesn"t learn me anything. During the time at chalmers we have done more development projects than necessary, al of the projects use diffrent models (Lips, Value model, etc) - and Lips has been the worst so far.» (Poor)
- Would like the course to be all about the project, the lectures and the book was just waste of time, gave nothing!» (Poor)
- all mandatory lectures where the same lectures we have had as mandatory before in project courses during the bachelor, some where even less into depth than previous lectures rendering them a complete waste of my time.» (Poor)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The same kind of assignments, but more focus on the development and less on planning.»
- More or less nothing, just put the focus on making the best for the sponsor not to read bad books»
- The seminars and guest lectures (especially with McKinsey)»
- The cooperation with the companies worked fine»
- Since it was a project course, the interesting subjec areas for projects should be kept.»

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Less focus on planning and delivering diffrent hand ins, more focus on the result.»
- More focus on the actual project»
- Nothing really»
- Everything else»
- It would be nicer if any one could select his own project.»

16. Additional comments

- A real changeover of the course has to be done!»
- Could start with the forming of the groups, to make the selection directly negative for swedish men does not suit a non gender and racial agenda. Just because your not a girl or a foreign student you wont have your first selection among the companies. It also seems like the teachers put content that they like without any actual connection to the project and what suits the sponsor. To make a Chalmers education look good in the companies yeas should be the focus when involving them. »
- The book was very easy to read.»
- Look at the IKOT course at the M programme. Thats has the right workload level and better structure to make sure you can learn something. Consider deep diving in one or two of the mandatory topics instead of having introduction lectures. Take group dynamics for example and have 4-5 lectures or exercises on that topic.»
- Overall the contacts made during the project course was interesting.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.4

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.4
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.35

Kursutvärderingssystem från