ENKÄTER

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Robotics and manufacturing automation 2013, MPR213

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-24 - 2013-08-29
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 55%
Kontaktperson: Marie Iwanow»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week» 6 54%

Around 20 hours/week» 1 9%

Around 25 hours/week» 2 18%

Around 30 hours/week» 1 9%

At least 35 hours/week» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- the weeks with labs i spent a little more» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%» 0 0%

25%» 0 0%

50%» 1 9%

75%» 4 36%

100%» 6 54%

Genomsnitt: 4.45

- some guest lecturers were pretty interesting, but also boring. The lecturs by hendrik were pretty good! very much practical information - i like that! but the other lecturs were mostly unimportant and just stuff, that you could easily read on the companies webpage» (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals» 1 9%

The goals are difficult to understand» 0 0%

The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» 1 9%

The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» 9 81%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- This course had the most clear and well-stated goals I"ve had in any course at Chalmers.» (The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn)

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low» 0 0%

Yes, the goals seem reasonable» 11 100%

No, the goals are set too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

5. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 2 18%

Large extent» 7 63%

Great extent» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

6. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent» 1 9%

Some extent» 4 36%

Large extent» 4 36%

Great extent» 2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- the labs are great» (Large extent)

7. Your opinion on the lecture: Robert Bohlin (FCC, Path Planning)

11 svarande

Very good» 5 50%

Good enough» 3 30%

Not very good» 1 10%

Bad» 1 10%

No opinion» 1

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- good practical information - nice» (Very good)
- but hade the exact same lecture in virtual process planning» (Very good)

8. Your opinion on the lecture: Bertil Torwaldson (ABB)

11 svarande

Very good» 5 50%

Good enough» 4 40%

Not very good» 1 10%

Bad» 0 0%

No opinion» 1

Genomsnitt: 1.6

9. Your opinion on the lecture: Johan Nordling (Siemens)

11 svarande

Very good» 2 22%

Good enough» 5 55%

Not very good» 2 22%

Bad» 0 0%

No opinion» 2

Genomsnitt: 2

- were not able to be there» (No opinion)

10. Your opinion on the lecture: Conny Pettersson (KUKA)

10 svarande

Very good» 6 66%

Good enough» 3 33%

Not very good» 0 0%

Bad» 0 0%

No opinion» 1

Genomsnitt: 1.33

11. Your opinion on the lecture: Thomas Lydhig (Teamster)

11 svarande

Very good» 3 30%

Good enough» 6 60%

Not very good» 1 10%

Bad» 0 0%

No opinion» 1

Genomsnitt: 1.8

- I liked him and his person and way of talking about his work. But i did not understand why we were talking so much about sketchup.» (Not very good)

12. Your opinion on the lecture: Erik Nilsson (Dual Arm Robotics)

11 svarande

Very good» 1 10%

Good enough» 8 80%

Not very good» 1 10%

Bad» 0 0%

No opinion» 1

Genomsnitt: 2

- Not his fault - but why should someone teach something, that he is not allowed to talk about??!?!» (Not very good)

13. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly» 0 0%

Rather badly» 0 0%

Rather well» 4 36%

Very well» 7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor» 0 0%

Rather poor» 0 0%

Rather good» 0 0%

Very good» 10 90%

I did not seek help» 1 9%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- assistance for robot problems was always very good» (Very good)

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly» 0 0%

Rather poorly» 0 0%

Rather well» 0 0%

Very well» 11 100%

I did not seek cooperation» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 4

16. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 7 63%

High» 4 36%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- the second lab toke allot of time » (Adequate)
- High, because it took a while to get used to the programming» (High)

17. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low» 0 0%

Low» 0 0%

Adequate» 4 36%

High» 7 63%

Too high» 0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- Studied three courses.» (High)

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor» 0 0%

Fair» 0 0%

Adequate» 1 9%

Good» 6 54%

Excellent» 4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.27 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- thank you that we can learn the robot programming!» (Good)
- the lectures from the industry were very good but the kinematics were hard to follow, they were very messy.» (Good)
- One of the better courses I have taken in the master program.» (Excellent)

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The labs helped a lot to the learning outcome.»
- Laboratories»
- The laborations & guestlectures»
- the labs»
- guest lectures, Henriks lectures were very good as well. the labs were very good also»
- The labs and the kinematics.»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- Some of guest lecturer may be changed.»
- The kinematics courses, i would have rather lectures with notes and clear definition and theorems than a ppt.»
- Somthing should change with the Kinematic lectures.»
- Per needs to learn some pedagogy»
- Maybe some guest lectures could be made more relevant to the course.»

21. Additional comments

- Overall the course was quite fine.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.27

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4.27
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.81

Kursutvärderingssystem från