Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

Advanced separation technology, KAA102, sp4 2013

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 9
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 40%
Kontaktperson: Inga-Lena Hagelin»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Kemiteknik med fysik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

9 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»7 77%
Around 20 hours/week»1 11%
Around 25 hours/week»1 11%
Around 30 hours/week»0 0%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.33

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

9 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»4 44%
75%»2 22%
100%»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

9 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»5 55%
The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»1 11%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 33%

Genomsnitt: 2.22

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

6 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 16%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»5 83%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.83

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

7 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»4 57%
Yes, definitely»2 28%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 14%

Genomsnitt: 2.57

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»2 22%
Large extent»5 55%
Great extent»2 22%

Genomsnitt: 3

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

9 svarande

Small extent»1 11%
Some extent»3 33%
Large extent»4 44%
Great extent»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.55

8. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

9 svarande

Very badly»2 22%
Rather badly»2 22%
Rather well»4 44%
Very well»1 11%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

Study climate

9. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

9 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»4 44%
Rather good»3 33%
Very good»2 22%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.77

10. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

9 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»1 11%
Very well»8 88%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.88

11. How was the course workload?

9 svarande

Too low»2 22%
Low»1 11%
Adequate»6 66%
High»0 0%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.44

12. How was the total workload this study period?

9 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 22%
Adequate»2 22%
High»5 55%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.33

Summarizing questions

13. What is your general impression of the course?

9 svarande

Poor»2 22%
Fair»3 33%
Adequate»1 11%
Good»3 33%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.55 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

14. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The ultra filtration laboration was very helpful.»
- The lectures given by mr Rasmuson were good. The topics discussed were interesting and well explained.»
- All lectures were good, but they were to few and there was not enough information in the course! It felt more like 3 Hp than 7,5.»
- The lectures were really good, keep them»
- Learning hysis. »

15. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The tutorials. The Phd student showing the tasks must know the theory behind the tasks and must be able to answer questions. There was also breaches in the communication between the Phd and the students since she didn"t speak that good english.»
- Upload all the handouts and the powerpoints used. The exercise didn"t help at all to understand the subjects of the lectures. It was more way more confusing than adding knowledge.»
- - The assistant Kurnia Wyijanti. Here style of teaching was horrible. She couldn"t answer our questions and she didn"t follow any of our remarks. - There was a laboration about dynamic simulation. The teacher for this part did not know what to do exactly, because, as he told, he only was involved with this topic once a year, when giving this lab assignment. Therefore, no-one understood what we were supposed to do in this laboration.»
- Labs, computer labs and Kurnias/Gunnars excercises. The excercices were embarrassingly bad, felt like i was 10 years old, and the computer labs were even worse! example: "hold the mouse of this symbol, click once and wait. hold now the mouse here and click again..." - I did not learn anything from the computer labs, and in my opinion almost all students knew Aspen HYSYS better than both gunnar and kurnia - who did not know it at all! during the last lab Kurnia had solved the exercises and given us the solution, our task was to change a single value... - WAS THIS A JOKE? It is a technical University and not a kindergarten.»
- Make handouts to each leacture, too risky when you have to follow everything on overheads or on the board»
- The numerical part of the course was probably the worst thing I have experienced at chalmers. The exercises were very poorley performed. I didn"t understand anything during them and neither seemed the teacher. Since the exam didn"t have any numerical part I feel that the there should be a significant change to the exercises next year!! The last exercise is more often than not used for solving old exam questions. This should definitely be implemented in this course aswell.»
- An exercise-teacher that is more prepared and can answer questions better.»
- The excersises where not good. No clear aim of the class, the tutor did not explain much, just wrote on the board and where not prepared for questions. The dynamic simulation laboration did not give much, did not really learn anything. »

16. Additional comments

- The course was good, although, better tutorials are necessary.»
- I think the course"s professor, mr Rasmuson, is good at teaching. However, he seems not to care about the other parts of the course, so it seems. I felt sorry for miss Wyjanti, who had the task to teach us exercises that were not included in the exam. Thus, she did this work for nothing. In addition, she didn"t seem to receive any feedbackk about her teaching style. This contributes to my opinion that mr Rasmuson only cared for his own part and not for the whole course, although he is responsible for the entire course.»
- I regret that I took this course because I have hardly learnt anything. This course should be removed from MPISC or heavily changed! The thing that upsets me the most is that it is within an important topic, but hardly contains any information!»
- MAybe put a little more into the laborations, The CFD is a very time consuming course but some of the laboration where like nothing to do»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.55

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.55
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.38

Kursutvärderingssystem från