Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPCOM 1213-4 Wireless networks, SSY145

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 13
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 65%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

1. What is your study programme?

13 svarande

Communication Engineering»9 69%
Computer Systems and Networks»2 15%
Other»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 1.46

- Erasmus» (Other)

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

13 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»3 23%
Around 20 hours/week»3 23%
Around 25 hours/week»5 38%
Around 30 hours/week»2 15%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

13 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»9 69%
100%»4 30%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

13 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 8%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»6 50%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 41%
I have not seen/read the goals»1

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- This course does not have any goals, but it should! As a Communication engineer, I would like to learn more advanced stuff about Wireless Networks and not only a bit from guest lectures» (The goals are difficult to understand)
- There were contradictions concerning the planning report and the progress report. What the examiner said did not really match the course description.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

12 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 8%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 91%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.91

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

12 svarande

No, not at all»1 8%
To some extent»6 50%
Yes, definitely»5 41%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.33

- The examination could have been better! I do not thing that it is correct to be examined on "YouTube" videos!!!» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»3 23%
Some extent»3 23%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»2 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.46

- The teacher did not teach anything important. He was more like a coordinator and still there were a lot of mistakes that were done» (Small extent)
- the (guest) lectures" quality was distributed over a wide range, so were the presenters" quality.» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

13 svarande

Small extent»2 15%
Some extent»5 38%
Large extent»5 38%
Great extent»1 7%

Genomsnitt: 2.38

- The course literature is not specific, as each guest lecture has its own literature» (Small extent)
- The slides have been extremely important due to the course being quite broad» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

13 svarande

Very badly»1 7%
Rather badly»2 15%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»3 23%

Genomsnitt: 2.92

- We never received our grades about our projects. I did not know how my group was doing.» (Very badly)
- aside from the information about planning and progress report» (Very well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

13 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»3 25%
Rather good»7 58%
Very good»2 16%
I did not seek help»1

Genomsnitt: 2.91

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

13 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»2 15%
Rather well»7 53%
Very well»4 30%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.15

- we had some issues in our group work» (Rather poorly)
- Different backgrounds is challenging, however the teachers should keep that in mind when they correct the projects» (Rather well)

12. How was the course workload?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»10 76%
High»2 15%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.07

13. How was the total workload this study period?

13 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 7%
Adequate»9 69%
High»3 23%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

13 svarande

Poor»2 15%
Fair»3 23%
Adequate»3 23%
Good»5 38%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.84 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- I am not satisfied. This is a general course, it should have been more specific. I want a Master Degree where I will learn important stuff, not just get an idea about technologies» (Poor)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Presentation»
- Project, CHOCS courses.»
- The project. It was a nice procedure, however with a little or no help at all.»
- The review questions! And to give hints/answers to the review questions latest 2 weeks before the exam.»
- the concept of guest lectures»
- The project and the visit to Ericsson»
- Examination.»
- The interactions with factory. »

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- grouping method»
- Courses and Exam.»
- The course material!!!»
- Making the exam weigh more than the project. Or at least equal. Group projects can be hard depending on who you get teamed up with.»
- course description»
- The course was divided into two parts, project (70%) and Examination(30%). The project was well defined and I felt comfortable with the goals of project. But the examination part was too tough. Because we almost had 14 lectures and TA"s asked us to study all 14 lectures for the examination. Too much of time I spent for preparing the examination.I didn"t felt like writing exam for 30% of my grade.»
- The supervisor. »
- Nothing.»

17. Additional comments

- Nothing»
- Make this Master Programmes challenging with interesting courses!!!»
- Since the course only had guest lecture, it was very hard to know what to focus on. The course gave an overview of so many different subjects that we didn"t learn that much about any of them. Rocco didn"t know enough about the schedule (vacations etc.) and the expected workload of a student. I think it would be good if someone else is responsible for the course next year. »
- We should have more detailed clearly guide and workload to reach the goal of the course. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.84

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.84
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.46

Kursutvärderingssystem från