ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

SP4_12/13 Applied industrial ecology, ENM021

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-31 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 57%
Kontaktperson: Christina Larsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»2 18%
Around 25 hours/week»5 45%
Around 30 hours/week»2 18%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- really low work load in the course» (At most 15 hours/week)

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»0 0%
75%»4 36%
100%»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 4.63

- I would have liked more lectures» (100%)
- sad that there wasn´,t more hours for teaching » (100%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»0 0%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»5 45%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»5 45%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 9%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»9 81%
No, the goals are set too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2

- It is possible for this class to not exist. One can simply read the articles and obtain the same knowledge.» (No, the goals are set too low)

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»5 45%
Yes, definitely»6 54%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- pity that it was questions from previous years´,exams.. isn´,t the content of the course different this year..» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.36

- again, it too little teaching» (Some extent)

7. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»6 54%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- the articles were good» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has assignment 1 (on industrial metabolism) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

- The assignments were a lot of work yet in the presentations, it was clear that some groups put more effort in to the assignment than others. But a lot of groups received 4 extra points, which is seemingly arbitrary.» (Some extent)

9. To what extent has assignment 2 (on technology assessment) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 3

10. To what extent has workshop 1 (on project plans) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»4 36%
Some extent»3 27%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- These workshops were less useful and should be replaced with actual teaching.» (Small extent)
- were we supposed to learn from that workshop?!» (Small extent)

11. To what extent has workshop 2 (on technology assessment) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

12. To what extent has workshop 3 (on indicators) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»2 18%
Some extent»5 45%
Large extent»3 27%
Great extent»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- strange way to structure the lecture» (Some extent)

13. To what extent has workshop 4 (on ethics) been of help for your learning?

10 svarande

Small extent»4 40%
Some extent»4 40%
Large extent»1 10%
Great extent»1 10%

Genomsnitt: 1.9

- take this away, makes the course even more fuzzy!» (Small extent)

14. To what extent has the seminar (on the concept industrial ecology) been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 54%
Large extent»2 18%
Great extent»3 27%

Genomsnitt: 2.72

- funny with the interviews» (Some extent)

15. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

- nothing to complain about» (Very well)

Study climate

16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»0 0%
Very good»10 90%
I did not seek help»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»4 36%
Very well»7 63%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.63

18. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»2 18%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 63%
High»2 18%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.81

19. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»6 54%
High»4 36%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.27

Summarizing questions

20. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»4 36%
Adequate»2 18%
Good»3 27%
Excellent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 3.27 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- feels like there were no overall aim for this course» (Fair)

21. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The contents of the course and the material are interesting. The themes for the projects were very good. »

22. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The seminars -> the teacher most give more questions to discuss (or maybe add a role play?) or cut down the seminar time to 1 hour. In my groups we were often done after +30 min and started talking about something else. It felt a bit like a waste of time. Also I would like more lectures.»
- The assignments should include writte reports»
- does not have the assignments in parallel»
- 1. In other courses in this program, the project groups were not chosen by the students but set by the teachers, who saw to that the groups are mixed in regards to swedish-international students, students with different educational background etc. This makes the group work more interesting enhances integration of international students. I am a swedish student and I prefer NOT to choose my own groupmates, because this system of rotation is very good. I think it should be applied in all courses, I was surprised to see it wasn"t in this one. 2. I found it confusing an not very serious that we were supposed to do a presentation without handing in a report. This did not lighten the workload, and made it hard to understand for examlpe how we should account for references, etc. 3. The teaching about TA, forecasting and backcasting etc. was very theoretical, lacked examples. »

23. Additional comments

- Very nice teacher»
- The course was excellent and really enjoy it!There isn"t anything that should be changed to next year.»
- The lack of teaching in the course is difference from other courses and at times seems that there is little direction. More contact time with the teacher and more focused teaching about the projects would be beneficial.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 3.27
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 3.27
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.56

Kursutvärderingssystem från