Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPWPS 1213-4 Antenna engineering, SSY100

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 52%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

1. What is your study programme?

11 svarande

Communication Engineering»4 36%
Wireless, Photonics and Space Engineering»6 54%
Exchange student»0 0%
Other»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- Erasmus» (Other)

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»2 18%
Around 20 hours/week»5 45%
Around 25 hours/week»3 27%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 9%
50%»1 9%
75%»5 45%
100%»4 36%

Genomsnitt: 4.09

- While some of the lectures were really good, some of them could really use some improvement. One of the major problems was that there were too many teachers (14!).» (75%)

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»0 0%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 30%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»7 70%
I have not seen/read the goals»1

Genomsnitt: 2.7

- This course is a huge one with many concepts to understand. I hope the introduction class can be more clearer and provide every working area that each teach focuses in. Each lecturer gives one part of the course goals that they are working at in the introduction class if necessary.» (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

10 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 80%
No, the goals are set too high»2 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

10 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»8 80%
Yes, definitely»2 20%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2.2

- The exam placed a little too much emphasis on array antennas, especially if considering that planar array antennas was not discussed at all during exercises. Other topics was left out completely.» (To some extent)
- Yes but having a huge assignment in the end (25% of the total points) with just patch arrays wasn"t really fair. We only had one or two lectures and not a single tutorial.» (To some extent)
- exam covers plenty of coners of the course.» (To some extent)
- The exam focused on things that was only brought up briefly on the lectures/tutorials.» (To some extent)

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»4 36%
Some extent»2 18%
Large extent»5 45%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.09

- There were too many lecturers. The lecturers needs more training, they need to be more consist in their teaching style with each other. » (Small extent)
- Maybe not mainly the teaching but the slides has been good for my learning. During the lectures, there is so much information to process.» (Large extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»4 36%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»2 18%

Genomsnitt: 2.63

- The book is hard to read and not very well structured, although the material covered there is very good.» (Small extent)
- The book is hard to get into since its so mathematical.» (Some extent)
- But there"s still too many things that need to be corrected. Why can"t the students use a book which is used as a standard in the industry. I can"t see the point of using the current one and the matlab handbook didn"t work on x64 systems. Neither did it work on Linux which is just absurd.» (Large extent)
- especially the exercise class offers deep comprehensibility of course goals.» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»1 9%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»9 81%
Very well»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- It was rather hard to figure out what i was supposed to do.» (Very badly)
- I still havent got my grade for the last home assignment...» (Rather well)
- handwriting type replaced by printing type could be better because everyone has different writing ways which is not so clear to anybody else, not mention posted on webpage.» (Rather well)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»5 62%
Very good»3 37%
I did not seek help»3

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Only did it once though» (Very good)

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»8 80%
Very well»2 20%
I did not seek cooperation»1

Genomsnitt: 3.2

12. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»7 63%
High»3 27%
Too high»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- two homeassignments were posted and should be done right at the last week before the exam. It is tricky and tough, but necessary.» (High)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 54%
High»5 45%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

- high but necessary» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»2 18%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»4 36%
Good»3 27%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.72 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- Although the material covered is very good and helpful for an engineer, the way the course is though is rather bad. Some of the lecturers are very hard to follow and that is sad.» (Poor)
- To be completely honest I was not impressed at all with the course. It felt like it was too much focus on the reverberation chamber and the things used by bluetest. The course has so much potential and most of us seemed really enthusiastic before the course"s start.» (Fair)
- It was good once i sat down and wnet trou all the lectures. It started to make sense then.» (Good)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The material covered is good. Laboratories and assignments are helpful.»
- Labs»
- The home assignments were good! Also the laborations were educative.»
- The home assignments were very helpful in practicing certain topics, especially the second one regarding radiation patterns and E- and H-planes, and should therefore be preserved.»
- industrial visit»
- The laboraties»
- The labs.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The fundamental things (second and forth chapter) should be taught by a more experienced teacher since they are very important!!! There should be more guidance for these chapter as well (more exercises)»
- Content of the course. That"s too much.»
- The number of teachers teaching»
- The topic of the fourth home assignment should be changed as all teaching on that topic occurs far too close to the exam week.»
- The book, swap it. Give us a book that reflects the industry. Why should we learn something that we won"t be able to use later on. And reduce the amount of lecturers. Some of the teachers (especially Yian and patch antenna couple) were really good but there were other which didn"t help at all with the learning process.»
- Ithink everythong is ok»
- It"s too many teaching assistants in this course such that we have to adapt many teaching styles.»

17. Additional comments

- Nothing»
- The practice of grading home assignments by either 2 points for more than 50% correct answers and providing 0 points for less than that is kinda weird. The workload for the HAs varied quite a lot and they could therefore have different max. scores as well as the possibility of getting something in-between the maximum score and zero for the effort.»
- Professors are good.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.72

Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.72
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.43

Kursutvärderingssystem från