ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPIDE 1213-4 Methods of interaction analysis, TDA466|TIA101

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 11
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 44%
Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp

1. What is your study program?

11 svarande

Interaction Design and Technologies»9 81%
University of Gothenburg»1 9%
Other»1 9%

Genomsnitt: 1.27

Your own effort

2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

11 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»5 45%
Around 20 hours/week»4 36%
Around 25 hours/week»1 9%
Around 30 hours/week»1 9%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.81

- Some lectures were really short. Project work took less time than expected» (At most 15 hours/week)

3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

11 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»0 0%
50%»1 9%
75%»2 18%
100%»8 72%

Genomsnitt: 4.63

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

4. How understandable are the course goals?

11 svarande

The goals are difficult to understand»1 9%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»7 63%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»3 27%
I have not seen/read the goals»0

Genomsnitt: 2.18

- needs more info about grading» (The goals are difficult to understand)

5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

11 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»11 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

11 svarande

No, not at all»1 9%
To some extent»9 81%
Yes, definitely»1 9%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0

Genomsnitt: 2

Teaching and course administration

7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»6 54%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- The lectures were often hard to follow and keep the attention up. The pace is mostly very slow and the teacher doesn"t stick to the current theme but often gets lost in stories and thoughts. Case studies are really nice to see real world examples but they should be kept brief lead to a conclusion quickly.» (Some extent)

8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

11 svarande

Small extent»1 9%
Some extent»6 54%
Large extent»4 36%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.27

- For the home exam the slides were fine to prepare. Still there were a lot of slides. Most lectures had more than hundred slides with a lot of swedish material inbetween and texts that were not supposed to be read. The material should definately be condensed to the message that should be communicated to the students. I would also wish for an effort to introduce more hierarchy and information visualization to the slides. There were to many long bullet point lists.» (Large extent)

9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

11 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»5 45%
Rather well»6 54%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.54

- The project PM has a lot of precise information from the start but I would have liked to find the information on the website and see it updated with recent organizational information from the lecture.» (Rather badly)

Study climate

10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

11 svarande

Very poor»0 0%
Rather poor»2 18%
Rather good»7 63%
Very good»2 18%
I did not seek help»0

Genomsnitt: 3

11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

11 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»7 63%
Very well»4 36%
I did not seek cooperation»0

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- Sometimes it was hard to get together to work because everyone set other priorities in their studies and leisure time.» (Rather well)

12. How was the course workload?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»2 18%
Adequate»8 72%
High»1 9%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.9

- The course workload was quite low compared to most other courses and I think that was good. I heard more than once that teachers think we work too much and this is one of the courses that doesn"t require to work through weekends on a regular basis.» (Adequate)

13. How was the total workload this study period?

11 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 9%
Adequate»5 45%
High»5 45%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.36

- In total the workload was well balanced as Social Media as a bit higher and Methods a bit lower. It should be like that.» (High)

Summarizing questions

14. What is your general impression of the course?

11 svarande

Poor»2 18%
Fair»2 18%
Adequate»5 45%
Good»2 18%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.63 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex)

- The idea of the course was really interesting but I sometimes missed more examples and I deeper view on each topic» (Fair)
- When I chose the course it was because there weren"t good alternatives. During introduction however I got the impression that it could be really interesting and useful. The execution was a bit poor unfortunately. The methods were mostly known from the methodology course so there was not too much new stuff. Interesting was to hear more about focus groups. » (Adequate)

15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- ice cream! the project was fun»
- The project gave us some good experience. Especially working with the data after gathering was very valuable. Maybe the project could even get a bigger share of the course.»
- the project»
- The final work is an interesting way of apply at least part of the knowledge you"ve adquired.»

16. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The seminaries where unstructured. For example the first should be divide in to small groups where we had read through their planing report and give them feedback. Or we should just get feedback form the teacher. The literature seminare had too many articles to read through. I rather discuss in smaller groups. »
- Better lecturers»
- more practical exercises. it"s all good reding about methods, but it"s invaluable to try them out yourself before the project»
- The slides and the talks should be more structured and I think there should be more effort to prepare them so they are straight forward. We spoke several times about the bus case study and many times it wasn"t clear what should be learned from the case study. So there should be clear format like "now we"re talking about focus groups", "This is the theory", "Here is a case study", "what can we learn? what are potential problems?"»
- slides»
- A bit deeper and more practical view on each topic.»
- Clearer goals and mid-way guidance for the project. No ambiguity about observable guidelines for assessing the final grade in the project.»

17. Additional comments

- I did apperently not understand the course (according to dugga results) and I would have liked to get written feedback so that I could have learned something from it. I still don"t know the correct answers. »
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.63
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.63
Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.4

Kursutvärderingssystem från