|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ENKÄTER | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Visa resultatHär kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPIDE 1213-4 Interaction design of social media, CIU190|TIA105Status: AvslutadÖppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15 Antal svar: 17 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 56% Kontaktperson: Börje Johansson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Informationsteknik 300 hp
1. What is your study program?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 1.41 - Erasmus» (Other) Your own effort2. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.41 3. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.64 - More, but not entirely 100%» (75%) Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.4. How understandable are the course goals?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.86 5. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2 - Even been reasonable you have to make a big effort to follow the course.» (Yes, the goals seem reasonable) 6. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?15 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.6 - I really liked that the design project was individual. The literature home exam was also ok and it was great to have all the information from the beginning. So everyone can work in their own pace and manage their time accordingly. Unfortunately this is an exception compared to other courses.» (Yes, definitely) Teaching and course administration7. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.29 8. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 2.94 - mandatory for exam» (Great extent) 9. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.64 - The website was regularly updated with up-to-date information and had a clear structure. Everything was easy to find. Really unique were the summaries that the teacher wrote after seminars. This was far beyond everything that I would have expected and very useful. The seminars gained more value. They were interesting when participating but the summaries provided the condensed points of what you should have learned from it. Great!» (Very well) Study climate10. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.82 - There were a lot of possibilities to get feedback during the project and feedback for exercises was also sufficient and soon after handing in.» (Very good) 11. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.52 12. How was the course workload?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - The workload was high but maybe also because I tried to make an extra effort to do well. I think it was quite balanced and less than the huge workload courses.» (High) 13. How was the total workload this study period?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 3.47 - Combined with the methods course the study period was very good in terms of workload. It can always be like that. Together with gameplay it would probably be worse.» (Adequate) Summarizing questions14. What is your general impression of the course?17 svarande
Genomsnitt: 4.29 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - This might not be the most important course in terms of real life/work application but I am convinced that this was the best executed course I have taken in the IxD&T programme. I learned a lot and the chance to apply a lot of my knowledge from courses like methodology and graphical interfaces in the project was great. I would recommend this course to everyone that is interested in social networks and on the interface design track.» (Excellent) 15. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Sus is a great teacher but I would also like to see more of Mathias Klang. The course had a set of very interesting guest lectures that should be kept.»- The structure» - guest lectures» - Keep the project like it is currently. The guest lectures were great, these should be kept. I loved the learning lecture by Carl Heath, very inspiring.» - Guests lectures» - The design part of the home exam» - Sus!» - No idea» - The topics selected and the guest lectures» - group exercises and uncommon projects to deliver» - Sus! And exercises and group work. » 16. What should definitely be changed to next year?- more guest lectures»- I invested a lot of time into creating the concept for the project and only had 1,5 days for wireframing and half a day for the look and feel. I think it was recommended to be like that but I felt like I noticed problems during wireframing and in the end missed some details. Maybe my sketches weren"t detailed enough but I think this phase should get a bit more time in the recommendations or there should be two iterations. I am not sure.» - I haven"t learned anything new throughout this course, so I guess that something that could be used or could apply in real situations (real designs) would be more helpful, rather than just plain theory» - the final project was a little bit too wide.» - No idea» - Some assignments were too big to the expected time to solve them» - Some of the texts were not that good. But was just a couple» 17. Additional comments- perfect»- IxD&T is a good programme and we have a lot of opportunities to learn and develop our skills. However I think that it misses it"s potential with a lot of bad executed or structured courses. If every course would be close to the quality of this course and all the teachers would put a comparable effort, the programme could be awesome. The only courses that have a comparable execution quality were methodology and infovis. The rest contained a lot of annoyances. Social Media should be the reference of how a course should be run. I hope you can influence other teachers to match this. It"s seems to be rare that teachers have the motivation to create the best learning experience for their students. Keep up the great work! Thank you I don"t want to sound like a bootlicker but I was really surprised by this course after not choosing Aesthetics.» - Thanks!» - No» Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4.29 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.82
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76%