Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

MPEPO 1213-4 Power electronic devices and applications, ENM070

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-05-31 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 20
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 43%
Kontaktperson: Monika Råberg Hellsing»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Elektroteknik 300 hp

Read this before filling in the questionnaire

Keep in mind that everyone involved in the course will be able to read your comments. Comments and criticism are welcome, but should remain constructive.

Your own effort

1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?

We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.

20 svarande

At most 15 hours/week»1 5%
Around 20 hours/week»4 20%
Around 25 hours/week»9 45%
Around 30 hours/week»6 30%
At least 35 hours/week»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3

2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend?

20 svarande

0%»0 0%
25%»1 5%
50%»3 15%
75%»5 25%
100%»11 55%

Genomsnitt: 4.3

Goals and goal fulfilment

The course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.

3. How understandable are the course goals?

20 svarande

I have not seen/read the goals»1 5%
The goals are difficult to understand»1 5%
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer»3 15%
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn»15 75%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.

19 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»19 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

By examination we mean laborations, assignments etc., as well as written exams or larger projects.

20 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»6 30%
Yes, definitely»14 70%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.7

Teaching and course administration

6. To what extent has the lectures been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»13 65%
Large extent»3 15%
Great extent»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 2.1

7. To what extent has the tutorials been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»3 15%
Large extent»8 40%
Great extent»8 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.15

8. To what extent has the DC/DC design project been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»7 35%
Large extent»10 50%
Great extent»2 10%

Genomsnitt: 2.65

9. To what extent has the practical lab been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»6 30%
Large extent»11 55%
Great extent»3 15%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

10. To what extent do you think that additional computer exercises would add to better understanding of the subject?

19 svarande

Small extent»3 15%
Some extent»8 42%
Large extent»3 15%
Great extent»5 26%

Genomsnitt: 2.52

11. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?

20 svarande

Small extent»1 5%
Some extent»5 25%
Large extent»10 50%
Great extent»4 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.85

12. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?

20 svarande

Very badly»1 5%
Rather badly»0 0%
Rather well»13 65%
Very well»6 30%

Genomsnitt: 3.2

13. Comments about teaching and course administration

- Very good tutorials»
- Lecturer may have good knowledge on subject but there is no liveliness in the lecture and I personally felt like the lecturer itself not having confidence in the subject.»
- I think that DC/DC project and practical lab can be one project. Maybe that first you are suppose to calculate what different components that has to be used and then you get the board and do the practical thing. In this way you build up a bigger understanding about the lab board and how it works, now you get a bit confused when doing two different things in the same time.»

Study climate

14. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?

20 svarande

Very poor»1 5%
Rather poor»1 5%
Rather good»2 10%
Very good»16 80%
I did not seek help»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.65

15. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?

20 svarande

Very poorly»0 0%
Rather poorly»0 0%
Rather well»3 15%
Very well»17 85%
I did not seek cooperation»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.85

16. How was the course workload?

20 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»11 55%
High»9 45%
Too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.45

17. How was the total workload this study period?

19 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»1 5%
Adequate»9 47%
High»8 42%
Too high»1 5%

Genomsnitt: 3.47

Summarizing questions

18. What is your general impression of the course?

20 svarande

Poor»1 5%
Fair»1 5%
Adequate»5 25%
Good»13 65%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

19. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- Dont know but the course is very broad(from the doping of silicone to HVDC-transmission) this makes the course hard to grasp, i think it should be more specific to one area of power electronics.»
- The practical lab project and ali:s approach to the tutorials»
- Tutor»
- Ali.»
- Really good tutorials.»
- Tutorials, labs, project»

20. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- In the lab project there needs to be reserve boards. Our broke and we had to use another groups board. Removing their components only to put them back on when the time was up. A lot of time was wasted on things that just made the project too long, which is a shame because it has a lot of potential. The DC/DC project didn"t feel so essential compared to the rest of the course material.»
- Kind of weird that DC-DC has nothing to do with this course (only PEC), but still i was nice to go through the whole design process. Could be nice to add some computer simulations as well »
- Its better lecturer change his way of teaching else better to handover the subject to some experienced lecturers. More information on how to use datasheet information while selecting components like how to re scale parameter for the rated values in datasheet to required circuit rated values.»
- The lecture slides contained too little information. It was hard to use them when studying.»
- When there is a scheduled practical laboration time the lab should be reserved for the course, that was not the case this time. There were several working places occupied by others during our time. That was really poor in my opinion.»
- Maybe better lectures»

21. Additional comments

- As in q.19»
- This course combined with High Voltage technology gave heavy work load the last half of the period. More of a problem in the High Voltage Course though. But the sooner projects get started the better. »
- Practical lab: Most of the boards are getting really crappy and it is sad that may 40-50% of the time spent had to due with bugs and redo of measurements due to bugs in circuits. I boards are not fixed for next year, it would be nice to get short introduction in beginning of first lab session to point out what should be kept in mind and what components in the circuits could be causing problems (mechenical switchs, variable resistors, tf, mosfet ect)»

Kursutvärderingssystem från