Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
MPNAV 1213-4 Wave loads and seakeeping, SJO745
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-05-28 - 2013-06-15 Antal svar: 7 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 50% Kontaktperson: Carl-Erik Janson» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Maskinteknik 300 hp Utbildningsprogram studenten tillhör: Maskinteknik 300 hp
Your own effort1. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.7 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 5 | | 71% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 2 | | 28% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.28 2. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 7 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 3 | | 42% |
50%» | | 3 | | 42% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 2.85 - Lectures seemed unnecessary» (25%)
- Kände inte att jag kunde ta in kunskapen i det format som det förelästes. Jag lär mig inte med ekvationer utan med exempel.» (50%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.3. How understandable are the course goals?7 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 2 | | 28% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 42% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 2.71 - The goals were clear but I think the lectures did not quite prepared us to reach the goals. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
4. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.6 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 1 | | 16% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 5 | | 83% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.83 5. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?6 svarande
No, not at all» | | 0 | | 0% |
To some extent» | | 3 | | 50% |
Yes, definitely» | | 2 | | 33% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 1 | | 16% |
Genomsnitt: 2.66
Teaching and course administration6. What is your opinion about the lectures?7 svarande
Poor» | | 5 | | 71% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 28% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.57 - Did not suit my may of learning the topic. The "wave lectures" were very good. » (Poor)
7. What is your opinion about the tutorials?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
Good» | | 4 | | 57% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 14% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.71 - The solutions could be a little bit more structured on the blackboard. Johannes did a very good job!» (Excellent)
8. What is your opinion about the OCTOPUS assignment?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 28% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 28% |
Good» | | 2 | | 28% |
Excellent» | | 1 | | 14% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - It was ok. Im not sure i learned much about sea keeping but at least i learned how the software works» (Adequate)
9. What is your opinion about the guest lecture on offshore?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 2 | | 28% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 28% |
No opinion» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 4.57 10. What is your opinion about the visit to SSPA?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 28% |
Good» | | 1 | | 14% |
Excellent» | | 3 | | 42% |
No opinion» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.85 - The report was a good way to make us learn more.» (Excellent)
11. What is your opinion about the assignment in the Bridge simulator?7 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Adequate» | | 1 | | 14% |
Good» | | 1 | | 14% |
Excellent» | | 4 | | 57% |
No opinion» | | 1 | | 14% |
Genomsnitt: 4.71 12. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 4 | | 57% |
Some extent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Large extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 1.42 - Stopped attending after the first week. i learned all from the compendium» (Small extent)
- Mostly studied the material by my self and with the class outside lectures» (Some extent)
13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?7 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 28% |
Great extent» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 3.14 - All of it» (Great extent)
14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?7 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 57% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 42% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42
Study climate15. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?7 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather good» | | 5 | | 71% |
Very good» | | 2 | | 28% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 - Johannes was very helpful» (Rather good)
16. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?7 svarande
Very poorly» | | 1 | | 14% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 2 | | 28% |
Very well» | | 4 | | 57% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.28 17. How was the course workload?7 svarande
Too low» | | 2 | | 28% |
Low» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 57% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.28 - I really felt as if I had one course all semester» (Too low)
18. How was the total workload this study period?7 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 14% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 57% |
High» | | 0 | | 0% |
Too high» | | 2 | | 28% |
Genomsnitt: 3.42
Summarizing questions19. What is your general impression of the course?7 svarande
Poor» | | 1 | | 14% |
Fair» | | 4 | | 57% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 28% |
Good» | | 0 | | 0% |
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.14 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) - Interesting topic but poor lectures, low workload and even lower expectations» (Poor)
- Feels like we could have learnt more. Especially when it comes to the design aspects.» (Adequate)
20. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- Sspa visits, bridge simulator, octopus»
- Tutorials, project assignment and bridge simulator should be kept for next year.»
- Octopus assignment»
- Octopussy, Bridge simulator, SSPA visit. Claes Eskilsson who presented his material very well. Claes is a rising star!»
21. What should definitely be changed to next year?- Lectures format: less equations more explanations on theory needed for the exam. We absolutely need extra assignment before the octopus assignment is due. Two or three small projects with a 3-4 page report about EoM, responses, etc would be much needed. In order to keep us engaged in the course.»
- Lectures are not very clear and informative. Some of the lectures were not being held because of the lecturers condition. »
- the lectures need to be changed to engage the interest of the students.»
- The lectures»
22. Additional comments- The major problem is that we got disengaged from the course after the second week when we realized the expectations on us were low.»
Genomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 2.14
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 2.14 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.28
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|