ENKÄTER
 

Utvärderingar

Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

VTA125 Building acoustics and community noise, spring 2013, sp 4

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 8
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36%
Kontaktperson: Lena Axelsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

8 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»0 0%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»8 100%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

8 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 12%
60-80%»3 37%
80-100%»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 4.37

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

8 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»1 12%
Yes, definitely»6 75%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»3 37%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»2 25%
Great extent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 2.37

- No extent. The lectures weren"t organized, so difficult to follow: it felt like a patchwork of ideas without a clear guideline. However, the lectures notes were excellent and helped me to learn (i actually used only them)» (Small extent)

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»1 12%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.25

- the lectures notes are good, well detailled. Sometimes confusiong when it comes to SEA and standards: a clear guideline would have been great to see in one look what one was supposed to do to apply standards.» (Large extent)

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

8 svarande

Very poor»1 12%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»4 50%
Very good»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 3.12

- Absolutely no feedback or help for the tasks, apart from comments like "it"s weird i don"t have the same thing", which were concluded by a poor grade. It was very frustrating for me. For the task, the onl help we had was to compare our graphs to the "good ones", and conclude if they were good or not, without interpretation. However, Jens was a very good help, too bad he wasn"t here more often. He was able to understand our problem and explain us how to solve it » (Very poor)

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

8 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»1 12%
Rather well»3 37%
Very well»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- I think there is too many assignments. They are really time consuming and severely graded, when they were presented as small/light tasks... They should be reduced. Moreover, the exam was as the other years (so not compensating the assignments workload)» (Rather badly)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

8 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»4 50%
Great extent»4 50%

Genomsnitt: 3.5

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

8 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»2 25%
about 50%»6 75%
60-80%»0 0%
more than 80%»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.75

10. How was the course workload?

8 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»6 75%
High»1 12%
Too high»1 12%

Genomsnitt: 3.37

- Too many assignments for poor results. The exam was not "lighter" than the previous years, even though we had a lot of assignments (they were big)» (Too high)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

8 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 12%
Adequate»2 25%
Good»3 37%
Excellent»2 25%

Genomsnitt: 3.75

- Disappointed by the assignments (workload and feedback) Disappointed by the exercises classes (the blackboard was a patchwork of notations, very hard to follow). The solutions given in the webpage were much more easier to understand and I hadn"t any "plus" with the classes » (Fair)

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

8 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»0 0%
Neutral»2 25%
Rahter high»3 37%
Very high»3 37%

Genomsnitt: 4.12

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The assignments.»
- The arrangement of the Assignments.»
- the lectures notes and exercies notes/solutions»
- Everything is neatly structured and provides a good understanding of the problems.»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- The course assistant.»
- Better and more structured lectures. The lectures need to be held before the assignment of the subject in question is handed out (or due).»
- - the assignments: less and/or lighter ones - more serious feedback on the assignments (read our report carefully, and try to understand what we didn"t understood, rather that just writing "it"s wrong" or equivalent) - eventually try to structure the lectures and classes so they are easier to follow, and organize a bit the blackboard »
- It is fine and thus no recommendations on the changes.»

Kursutvärderingssystem från