Aktuella utvärderingar

Visa resultat

Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering genom att använda knappen längst ned.

VTA145 Room acoustics, spring 2013, sp 3-4

Status: Avslutad
Öppen för svar: 2013-06-05 - 2013-09-15
Antal svar: 5
Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 29%
Kontaktperson: Lena Axelsson»
Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs

Learning outcomes and examination

Before you answer these questions, please check in the course syllabus what is stated about learning outcomes of the course.

1. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?

5 svarande

No, the goals are set too low»1 20%
Yes, the goals seem reasonable»4 80%
No, the goals are set too high»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 1.8

2. To what extent have you reached the learning outcomes?

5 svarande

0-20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
40-60%»1 20%
60-80%»2 40%
80-100%»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

3. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?

Please consider all kinds of examiantions during the course: assignments, projects, seminars, final written exam, etc.

5 svarande

No, not at all»0 0%
To some extent»2 40%
Yes, definitely»2 40%
I don"t know/have not been examined yet»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.8

- Even thought the first labs were nice (acoustics outdoor, or starting to design structures) were nice, they are too much time consuming and when the "real" project is coming (hence the design of the opera), we are in a rush because suddenly we have only 3 weeks left to conclude everything. So all the students spend all their Easter vacations working for RAC...» (To some extent)

Teaching and learning

4. To what extent has the organised teaching activities been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»1 20%
Some extent»1 20%
Large extent»3 60%
Great extent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

5. To what extent has the teaching material and the course home page been of help for your learning?

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»4 80%
Large extent»0 0%
Great extent»1 20%

Genomsnitt: 2.4

6. How were the opportunities to get feedback and for asking questions and getting help from teachers and supervisors?

5 svarande

Very poor»1 20%
Rather poor»0 0%
Rather good»2 40%
Very good»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3

Course organisation

7. How well did the course organisation, course information, course home page, handouts etc work?

4 svarande

Very badly»0 0%
Rather badly»4 100%
Rather well»0 0%
Very well»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 2

- I think we would have appreciate to have a more detailed view of the organization of the course, because we always learned at the end of one task the new one, and we had only a few days to do it so no time to get organized a bit. More time on the competition only would have been better too.» (?)

Study climate

8. To what extent have the facilties at Chalmers been appropriate to support your studies in this course, e.g. lecture halls, study rooms, equipment, computer labs etc.

5 svarande

Small extent»0 0%
Some extent»0 0%
Large extent»2 40%
Great extent»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

9. How much of your available time for studies in this study period did you spend on this course?

It is assumed that 50% of the time in one quarter is used for a course of 7,5 credit units.

5 svarande

less than 20%»0 0%
20-40%»0 0%
about 50%»1 20%
60-80%»1 20%
more than 80%»3 60%

Genomsnitt: 4.4

- I think in total, with both the Opera and all the lab tasks, I have spent at least the time corresponding to 15 credit units. » (more than 80%)
- all the students spend their all Easter vacations on the course, I think it"s really too much.» (more than 80%)

10. How was the course workload?

5 svarande

Too low»0 0%
Low»0 0%
Adequate»1 20%
High»2 40%
Too high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 4.2

- In my case it was too high, but that was because of my interest in the Opera project.» (High)

Summarising questions

11. What is your general impression of the course?

5 svarande

Poor»0 0%
Fair»1 20%
Adequate»0 0%
Good»4 80%
Excellent»0 0%

Genomsnitt: 3.6

12. What is the remaining value of the course in the future

5 svarande

Very small»0 0%
Rather small»1 20%
Neutral»1 20%
Rahter high»1 20%
Very high»2 40%

Genomsnitt: 3.8

- The idea about joining efforts with the architect students is very good but the communication between departments has to be improved.» (Very high)

13. What should definitely be preserved to next year?

- The project with the AT-students.»
- The project. »
- the collaboration with the architects»

14. What should definitely be changed to next year?

- You should have mentioned that the posters for the Opera project only needed to be a concept, since that was what the jury focused on. My group worked whole heartedly for an all-around great Opera, as did many other groups, with care taken for even the smallest details. If we would have known that the jury was mainly interested in the concept we wouldn"t have needed to spend so much (!!!) time on all the small details to make the opera great. I was really upset about this and was very dissapointed. I don"t blame the jury since I understand why they would pick candidates based on strong concepts. It angers me that so much of our work was overlooked.»
- The tasks before the project. The workload while doing the project is too high. Hence, the time it took to do the tasks before the project was started needs to be put on the project itself instead. The lectures need to be much better and everything need to be more structured.»
- How the course is organised. »

Kursutvärderingssystem från