Utvärderingar
Aktuella utvärderingar
Administrera
Hjälpsida
|
Visa resultat
Här kan se resultatet från utvärderingen och exportera statistiken till ett annat program. Det går också att
göra en enkel filtrering genom att klicka på svarsalternativen och kommentarerna eller en avancerad filtrering
genom att använda knappen längst ned.
LP 3 ARK460_V13_Advanced Theory and Methodology
Status: Avslutad Öppen för svar: 2013-04-17 - 2013-05-05 Antal svar: 8 Procent av deltagarna som svarat: 36% Kontaktperson: Anna Sofia Wannerskog» Utbildningsprogram som genomför enkäten: Chalmers: masterskurs
Personal background1. Where did you study for your Bachelor degree?8 svarande
Sweden - Chalmers» | | 4 | | 50% |
Sweden - another university» | | 0 | | 0% |
University outside Sweden» | | 4 | | 50% |
Other:» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 2. Are you:8 svarande
Female» | | 3 | | 37% |
Male» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 1.62
Your own effort3. How many hours per week did you spend on this course?We mean total time, that is, it comprises the time you spent in class and the time you spent on your own work. Try to estimate the average time over the entire study period.8 svarande
At most 15 hours/week» | | 4 | | 50% |
Around 20 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 25 hours/week» | | 1 | | 12% |
Around 30 hours/week» | | 0 | | 0% |
At least 35 hours/week» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.37 - The amount of work wasn"t the same every week, at the end I worked much more than at the beginning» (At most 15 hours/week)
- I was researching and writing full time during the last four weeks of the course, exceeding 40 hours/week. » (At least 35 hours/week)
4. How large part of the teaching offered did you attend? 8 svarande
0%» | | 0 | | 0% |
25%» | | 0 | | 0% |
50%» | | 1 | | 12% |
75%» | | 0 | | 0% |
100%» | | 7 | | 87% |
Genomsnitt: 4.75 - I thought the tutorials were very helpful but maybe a little too much assistance in the beginning and too little in the end. » (100%)
Goals and goal fulfilmentThe course syllabus states the course goals in terms of learning outcomes, i.e., knowledge, skills and attitudes to be acquired by the student during the course.5. How understandable are the course goals?8 svarande
I have not seen/read the goals» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals are difficult to understand» | | 0 | | 0% |
The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer» | | 3 | | 37% |
The goals clearly describe what I am supposed to learn» | | 5 | | 62% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - A little fuzzy with the dates. » (The goals give some guidance, but could be clearer)
6. Do you feel that you reached the course goals as they were set out?8 svarande
No, I did not reach the goals as they were set out» | | 1 | | 12% |
Yes, I reached the goals as they were set out» | | 7 | | 87% |
Genomsnitt: 1.87 7. Was the aim of the course reasonable given your previous knowledge and background?8 svarande
No, the aim of the course was not reasonable» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the aim of the course was reasonable» | | 8 | | 100% |
Genomsnitt: 2 8. Did you find relevant materials to research for the subject you chose?8 svarande
No, I did not find relevant materials» | | 1 | | 12% |
Yes, I did find relevant materials» | | 7 | | 87% |
Genomsnitt: 1.87 9. Are the goals reasonable considering your background and the number of credits?Answer this this question and the succeeding one, only if you do know the course goals.8 svarande
No, the goals are set too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Yes, the goals seem reasonable» | | 8 | | 100% |
No, the goals are set too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 10. Did the examination assess whether you have reached the goals?8 svarande
No, not at all» | | 1 | | 12% |
To some extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Yes, definitely» | | 4 | | 50% |
I don"t know/have not been examined yet» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.87
Teaching and course administration11. How satisfied are you with your studies at Chalmers?8 svarande
Excellent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 5 | | 62% |
Adequate» | | 3 | | 37% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.37 12. To what extent has the teaching been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Some extent» | | 5 | | 62% |
Large extent» | | 1 | | 12% |
Great extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 2.62 - I wish to have more time with the tutors, especially towards the end of assignments.» (Some extent)
13. To what extent has the course literature and other material been of help for your learning?8 svarande
Small extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Some extent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Large extent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Great extent» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2 - The topic was very open, so I did most of my own research. » (Small extent)
14. How well did the course administration, web page, handouts etc work?8 svarande
Very badly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather badly» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather well» | | 4 | | 50% |
Very well» | | 3 | | 37% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 - The course was very well organised. » (Very well)
15. How satisfied are you with the facilities of Chalmers?8 svarande
Excellent» | | 4 | | 50% |
Good» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 2 | | 25% |
Fair» | | 0 | | 0% |
Poor» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 2.12
Study climate16. How were the opportunities for asking questions and getting help?8 svarande
Very poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poor» | | 1 | | 12% |
Rather good» | | 1 | | 12% |
Very good» | | 6 | | 75% |
I did not seek help» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.62 - I would have a liked a few more meetings towards the end. » (Very good)
17. How well has cooperation between you and your fellow students worked?8 svarande
Very poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather poorly» | | 0 | | 0% |
Rather well» | | 6 | | 75% |
Very well» | | 2 | | 25% |
I did not seek cooperation» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.25 18. How was the course workload?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 5 | | 62% |
High» | | 2 | | 25% |
Too high» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 19. How was the total workload this study period?8 svarande
Too low» | | 0 | | 0% |
Low» | | 2 | | 25% |
Adequate» | | 4 | | 50% |
High» | | 1 | | 12% |
Too high» | | 1 | | 12% |
Genomsnitt: 3.12 - I took very interesting courses but all at the same time and the schedules were not very compatible. » (Too high)
Summarizing questions20. How satisfied are you with the structure of the AT&M course (schedule etc)?8 svarande
Excellent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Good» | | 4 | | 50% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 2 | | 25% |
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Genomsnitt: 2.25 21. What is your general impression of the course?8 svarande
Poor» | | 0 | | 0% |
Fair» | | 1 | | 12% |
Adequate» | | 0 | | 0% |
Good» | | 5 | | 62% |
Excellent» | | 2 | | 25% |
Genomsnitt: 4 (bidrar till totalt genomsnitt/jämförelseindex) 22. What should definitely be preserved to next year?- The tutorials in groups of 5 students and the meetings between students. »
- It is great that we get to pick our own topics, and that we"re given quite a bit of time for research. »
23. What should definitely be changed to next year?- re-set the schedule at the beginning: we had only one or two weeks to set the preliminary question, and it was too short to define a topic/make some researches/define a question. »
- Strange deadline that was later changed.»
- More time for research before we pick the topic, and a few more sessions with the tutor. »
24. Additional commentsGenomsnitt totalt för detta stycke: 4
Genomsnitt totalt för alla frågor: 4 Beräknat jämförelseindex: 0.75
Kursutvärderingssystem från
|